What I like best about Watermark Faculty Success is that it serves as a centralized hub for faculty activity data. Faculty only need to enter their information once, and the institution can then generate consistent, accurate reports for annual reviews, accreditation, and strategic planning. I also appreciate the flexibility — it can be tailored to reflect our institution’s unique requirements while reducing duplication of effort. Ultimately, it saves faculty and administrators time while improving the quality of data used for compliance and decision-making. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One challenge with Watermark Faculty Success is that faculty sometimes find the system burdensome, especially during the first year of implementation when they’re asked to enter a lot of historical data. The interface also isn’t always intuitive, which can discourage engagement. That said, I’ve found these challenges can be addressed through proactive support — for example, providing clear training sessions, pre-loading available data from other systems, and emphasizing how the tool ultimately reduces duplication for accreditation and annual reviews. When framed as a way to highlight faculty accomplishments rather than just compliance, buy-in improves significantly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing has changed from my original review in this regard. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We haven't had any further issues like this one previously, so things have been smooth...so long as we don't try to reinvent the wheel. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love the ease of use of Watermark Faculty Success, with screens laid out in a common sense way, making it much easier to navigate compared to Interfolio. I appreciate the annual review report feature and the ability to create custom reports, which are very useful for our assessments and annual reviews. Their responsiveness is impressive, with work requests completed much faster than expected. The integration and support team's efficiency and care in handling requests have greatly benefited our processes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the process of editing data and uploading files to be somewhat cumbersome and would appreciate an easier format for this. Additionally, while the transition to Watermark wasn't the platform's fault, dealing with inconsistent and messy data from Interfolio was challenging, as it required considerable manual effort to recode files for compatibility with Watermark. Finally, while I do feel 'locked in' due to all my data being on Watermark, it highlights a limitation in terms of data portability. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Watermark Faculty Success has significantly simplified faculty reporting for me. I appreciate having everything consolidated in one platform—teaching, publications, service, and grants—so I only need to enter information once. This has saved me a great deal of time, especially during annual reviews and accreditation processes. I also value how it can be customized to fit our institution’s specific needs. While it isn’t perfect, it’s a substantial improvement compared to managing everything through spreadsheets and emails. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At times, the system can feel clunky and unintuitive. Certain data entry screens are confusing, making it easy to get lost among the many categories. While the customization options are impressive, they can also lead to inconsistencies between departments. Overall, it isn't the most user-friendly system, particularly for those using it for the first time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The workflow is smooth and adaptable. Each stage in the review can occur automatically, with files transferred appropriately.

The process is relatively simple to implement, and the administrative authority is clean. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The interface seems cluttered from the perspective of the end user, which can make it feel overwhelming, especially for someone using it for the first time. Its complexity may pose a challenge to new users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Overall, it’s a helpful tool for organizing and tracking faculty achievements, though there’s room for a more intuitive interface. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It makes it easy to centralize and document faculty activities, research, publications, and service. The reporting features are very useful for annual reviews and accreditation needs, helping reduce manual work and improve data consistency. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This is an extremely user friendly platform that provides several ways to capture data. It is highly intuitive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't really dislike anything other than the CV generation seems to be fairly basic. It would be nice to have more options for design but that is also impractical. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the ease of use is a huge advantage. There are so many parts of the platform that are informative and can really help you be a better faculty member. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Logging into the system can take some time. If you forget your password, it can be difficult to have a reminder sent. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Watermark Faculty Success is user-friendly. The streamlined layout makes it quick and easy to log publications and teaching activities, requiring just a few clicks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It’s a good platform, but it can maybe improve related flexibility so users can preview report sections. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

They are creating a comprehensive faculty system that can take faculty from cradle to grave. Their customer support team has been great to work with and very knowledgeable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There isn't logic built in anywhere. This would make it much easier to use. Ease of linking Faculty Success to other Watermark modules. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.