trendHERO Reviews & Product Details

It is convenient to analyze profile metrics and make reports for performance assessment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Account Quality Score (AQS) is difficult to represent on other social networks and calculate independently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ease of Use. Fast reports, a lot of useful information, beautiful graphics. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A lot of needed information only in Premium, so quite expensive if you are using not so frequently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find similar audiences useful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The limitations when creating reports despite having a paid account. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Amounts of criteria’s. The part about interests of followers is very cool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Generating reports takes a lot of time. I'd like to open all possible reports about 1 account using 1 button. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Very good detailed analyst programme and good support, responds quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I couldn't pay with my Russian card. The report was not opened on the free tariff Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Visual dashboards, excel export, amount of metrics Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

No drawbacks were identified. Highly recommended Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

General a good experience and very helpful tool to get insights, evaluate and help prioritize potential unknown partners. Also evaluation of own insta profile in sense of quality and drinving activities in that direction is helpful. UI and User-Nvaigation is also intuitive.

Its quite easy to understand and usability is quite high i would say using common design and usage patterns and best practices - not reinvent the wheel.

I use it currently nearly daily in our work (account startup phase).

Customer support not tested so far. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

"On demand" Pricing model and artificial limitations feels a bit like a service which wants to squeeze out the money since i expect the data is there already and processing is not that cost factor.

Following features are not clear to me: "outreach", "overlaps", "ad posts". Some quick "value prop", "what", "why", "how" description would help in undstanding also - for which use cases this is relevant. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

User friendly, light, with no extra complications Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I can't find it still. No visible complications Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In TrendHero, it's very convenient to work in the following order:

1. Search for bloggers using keywords

2. Sort the results by the necessary criteria (for me, it's ER)

3. Add everyone to lists (this is really convenient. I didn't use this at my previous job, but I use it regularly here. No need to run around with tables in Excel or Notion)

4. Review by ER, by publication reach, and if necessary, conduct checks

After purchasing a check, everything about the blogger becomes clear. It's cool. I have questions about the column "who the audience is subscribed to," but more on that in the cons section.

I only use this service because it offers the best price/quality ratio. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. Few checks. They can be purchased additionally, but for small businesses or with a limited budget, this is very difficult.

2. If you look at who the target audience is subscribed to - you can't adjust by city and other criteria. Our target audience is subscribed to all sorts of trash, but as an SMM specialist, I'm only interested in bloggers. City public pages, etc., divert attention. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I've signed up because I had a dramatic and sudden drop in my engagement rates. It was good to check the quality of the accounts that are following me and compare them to other accounts that are similar to mine. It helped me implement some changes and provide a quality check of the accounts that follow mine. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The quality check of the accounts was not very helpful, unfortunately. When I found out that I have a large number of suspicion accounts and mass followers, I started manually deleting them. As a result, the number of quality audience has dropped while the number of suspicion accounts and mass followers remained the same which makes me question the method which is used to calculate the quality audience. In addition, the description of 'quality audience' has changed in the past few weeks. Initially, it included a foreign language in the account as a criteria and categorized those accounts as suspicious. The wording has changed, but my numbers remained the same and this is also something that I think is questionable considering my page is for English learners and most of them would use a language other than English for their account. If this criteria was really removed, there would be a shift in my numbers in a more positive way, which did not happen. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.