Reduce your software costs by 18% overnight
Travis CI

Travis CI Alternatives & Competitors

(80)4.6 out of 5

Looking for alternatives to Travis CI? Tons of people want Continuous Integration Tools to help with test customization. What's difficult is finding out whether or not the software you choose is right for you. We have compiled a list of Continuous Integration Tools that reviewers voted best overall compared to Travis CI. Based on reviewer data you can see how Travis CI stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users, and find the best fit for your business. CircleCI, Jenkins, CloudBees CodeShip, and Bitrise are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Travis CI.

Top Alternatives to Travis CI

  • CircleCI
  • Jenkins
  • CloudBees CodeShip
  • Bitrise
  • Microsoft Team Foundation Server

Top 20 Alternatives & Competitors to Travis CI

    #1
    #1
  1. CircleCI

    (386)4.4 out of 5
    Optimized for quick response

    CircleCI gives you all the benefits of continuous integration with none of the headaches of maintaining it.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  2. CircleCI gives you all the benefits of continuous integration with none of the headaches of maintaining it.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    Lee P.
    LP
    This platform is fast and friendly, and most importantly helps run all my unit tests to stop issues making way into production

    Reviewers say compared to Travis CI, CircleCI is:

    Slower to reach roi
    More expensive
    #2
    #2
  3. Jenkins

    (300)4.3 out of 5

    Jenkins is an application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  4. Jenkins is an application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    UI
    The CI/CD works well. Lots of plugins to help with things you want to do.

    Reviewers say compared to Travis CI, Jenkins is:

    Slower to reach roi
    18%   of software applications aren't well liked by teams using them.
    Find out how your team feels about your stack with G2 Pulse Surveys.
    Learn More
    #3
    #3
  5. CloudBees CodeShip

    (159)4.3 out of 5
    Optimized for quick response

    Codeship offers hosted continuous integration and deployment for your web apps, including rails, php, python, java or go apps.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  6. Codeship offers hosted continuous integration and deployment for your web apps, including rails, php, python, java or go apps.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    RW
    I like how simple it is to setup CI using Codeship Basic.

    Reviewers say compared to Travis CI, CloudBees CodeShip is:

    Slower to reach roi
    More expensive
    Better at support
    #4
    #4
  7. Bitrise

    (147)4.9 out of 5
    Optimized for quick response

    Bring back the joy of app development! Mobile Continuous Integration & Delivery for your whole team, with dozens of integrations for your favorite services.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  8. Bring back the joy of app development! Mobile Continuous Integration & Delivery for your whole team, with dozens of integrations for your favorite services.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    AM
    Quite intuitive and very easy to onboard any new application for Mobile. Also, the Scripting steps makes almost everything possible, as all custom steps can be configured and REST API can be scripted.

    Reviewers say compared to Travis CI, Bitrise is:

    Slower to reach roi
    More expensive
    Better at support
    #5
    #5
  9. Microsoft Team Foundation Server

    (136)4.1 out of 5

    An enterprise-grade server for teams to share code, track work, and ship software — for any language, all in a single package. It’s the perfect complement to your IDE.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  10. An enterprise-grade server for teams to share code, track work, and ship software — for any language, all in a single package. It’s the perfect complement to your IDE.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    meindert h.
    MH
    The integration with source control, no software issues as far as I can see The web interface is easy to use

    Reviewers say compared to Travis CI, Microsoft Team Foundation Server is:

    More expensive
    Slower to reach roi
    #6
    #6
  11. TeamCity

    (63)4.3 out of 5

    One reason TeamCity is dubbed an "Intelligent CI server" is its approach to integration. When we say we support a tool, we mean it in every way possible. For example, support for Visual Studio projects provides automatic detection of tool versions, testing frameworks support, code coverage, static code analysis, and more.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  12. One reason TeamCity is dubbed an "Intelligent CI server" is its approach to integration. When we say we support a tool, we mean it in every way possible. For example, support for Visual Studio projects provides automatic detection of tool versions, testing frameworks support, code coverage, static code analysis, and more.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    UM
    I find it so much more intuitive and easier to use than some of the standard CI platforms out there. It is very reliable and has helped us improve our software development process immensely. It is...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to Travis CI, TeamCity is:

    Slower to reach roi
    More expensive
    #7
    #7
  13. Bamboo

    (53)4.1 out of 5

    Bamboo does more than just run builds and tests. It connects issues, commits, test results, and deploys so the whole picture is available to your entire product team- from project managers, to devs and testers, to sys admins.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  14. Bamboo does more than just run builds and tests. It connects issues, commits, test results, and deploys so the whole picture is available to your entire product team- from project managers, to devs and testers, to sys admins.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    AI
    Clean UI, good high-level job monitoring. Very responsive actions, no hiccups or freezes.

    Reviewers say compared to Travis CI, Bamboo is:

    Slower to reach roi
    More expensive
    #8
    #8
  15. Octopus Deploy

    (40)4.3 out of 5

    Octopus works with your build server to enable reliable, secure, automated releases of ASP.NET applications and Windows Services into test, staging and production environments, whether they are in the cloud or on-premises.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  16. Octopus works with your build server to enable reliable, secure, automated releases of ASP.NET applications and Windows Services into test, staging and production environments, whether they are in the cloud or on-premises.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    AL
    The possibility to install complex solutions, even in various environments and different operating system in basically one click. In fact, after the machines and variables configuration, your...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to Travis CI, Octopus Deploy is:

    Slower to reach roi
    More expensive
    #9
    #9
  17. AWS CodePipeline

    (33)4.0 out of 5

    AWS CodePipeline is a continuous integration and continuous delivery service for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  18. AWS CodePipeline is a continuous integration and continuous delivery service for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    UI
    It's really a powerful tool to use, you can configure really complex workflows. You can easily integrate it to any type of workflow with different services and tools. It integrates best with the...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to Travis CI, AWS CodePipeline is:

    Slower to reach roi
    More expensive
    Better at support
    #10
    #10
  19. AppVeyor

    (23)4.4 out of 5

    Continuous Integration and Deployment service for busy Windows developers

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  20. Continuous Integration and Deployment service for busy Windows developers

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    Rachith P.
    RP
    Well, Firstly, its free for open source projects. A good CI build that includes build, test, and deploy means that you don't have to fear your code. When compared to Travis CI which is expensive...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to Travis CI, AppVeyor is:

    More expensive
    Easier to admin
    Easier to do business with
    #11
    #11
  21. GoCD

    (18)4.0 out of 5

    Go's OSS distribution uses an embedded database. That's great for getting started. But, if you need to scale beyond a few teams and several pipelines, our PostgreSQL plugin gives you the performance upgrade necessary for hundreds of pipelines and agents.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  22. Go's OSS distribution uses an embedded database. That's great for getting started. But, if you need to scale beyond a few teams and several pipelines, our PostgreSQL plugin gives you the performance upgrade necessary for hundreds of pipelines and agents.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    Rohan P.
    RP
    The User Experience, and the functionality provided.
    #12
    #12
  23. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

    (100)4.5 out of 5

    Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a simple way to automate apps and infrastructure. Application Deployment + Configuration Management + Continuous Delivery.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  24. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a simple way to automate apps and infrastructure. Application Deployment + Configuration Management + Continuous Delivery.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    Juuso S.
    JS
    The best thing about is that it's agentless, meaning it doesn't require anything running on your target instances, before provisioning them. Good old SSH is all you need. Before switching to...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to Travis CI, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is:

    More expensive
    More usable
    Easier to set up
    #13
    #13
  25. Chef

    (40)4.0 out of 5

    Chef turns infrastructure into code. With Chef, you can automate how you build, deploy, and manage your infrastructure. Your infrastructure becomes as versionable, testable, and repeatable as application code.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  26. Chef turns infrastructure into code. With Chef, you can automate how you build, deploy, and manage your infrastructure. Your infrastructure becomes as versionable, testable, and repeatable as application code.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    Phil A.
    PA
    The Chef DK allows you to have a full CI/CD workflow for your infrastructure as code. With chef you can stick to the community cookbooks and boilerplate resources or you can make it do anything you...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to Travis CI, Chef is:

    Slower to reach roi
    More expensive
    #14
    #14
  27. Drone.io

    (19)4.3 out of 5

    Continuous Integration and Deployment as-a-service. Nothing to install. Nothing to configure. No server maintenance. Integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket, Heroku and more to automatically build, test and deploy your code with zero human assistance.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  28. Continuous Integration and Deployment as-a-service. Nothing to install. Nothing to configure. No server maintenance. Integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket, Heroku and more to automatically build, test and deploy your code with zero human assistance.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    UR
    Drone allowed us to instantly start CI/CD quickly and efficiently. With other tools like Jenkins you have to go through so much configuration. Drone instantly connects with most enterprise level...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to Travis CI, Drone.io is:

    Easier to admin
    More usable
    #15
    #15
  29. Buildbot

    (19)4.4 out of 5

    At its core, Buildbot is a job scheduling system: it queues jobs, executes the jobs when the required resources are available, and reports the results.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  30. At its core, Buildbot is a job scheduling system: it queues jobs, executes the jobs when the required resources are available, and reports the results.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    UI
    Buildbot is an very flexible CI tool for auto-building/test/deployment. Within its python-writen configuration file, you could almost do anything that a python script can. On my own experience of...Read more
    #16
    #16
  31. Semaphore

    (127)4.7 out of 5

    Semaphore is a hosted continuous integration and deployment service for open source and private projects.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  32. Semaphore is a hosted continuous integration and deployment service for open source and private projects.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    David A.
    DA
    - Easy to set up complex CI pipelines - Really neat pipeline visualisation - Test artefacts to replay end-to-end failure videos - Customer support is excellent staff are knowledgeable and...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to Travis CI, Semaphore is:

    Slower to reach roi
    Better at support
    More expensive
    #17
    #17
  33. GitLab

    (292)4.4 out of 5

    An open source web interface and source control platform based on Git.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  34. An open source web interface and source control platform based on Git.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    Braulio R.
    BR
    All the functionalities that includes for free (community edition) and you can contribute with code or apply your on changes since you can manage your own instance inside your infrastructure.

    Reviewers say compared to Travis CI, GitLab is:

    Slower to reach roi
    More expensive
    Better at support
    #18
    #18
  35. CloudBees CI

    (251)4.2 out of 5
    Optimized for quick response

    CloudBees provides solutions that enable DevOps teams to respond rapidly to the software delivery needs of the business.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  36. CloudBees provides solutions that enable DevOps teams to respond rapidly to the software delivery needs of the business.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    Mark S.
    MS
    Great manageability because its comes with inbuilt CloudBees Jenkins Operations Center allowing large teams to manage master templates, RBAC and folders from this single console

    Reviewers say compared to Travis CI, CloudBees CI is:

    Slower to reach roi
    More expensive
    Better at support
    #19
    #19
  37. Spinnaker

    (15)4.2 out of 5

    Spinnaker helps codify the process of reliably deploying artifacts to the cloud, leveraging industry best practices out-of-the-box.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  38. Spinnaker helps codify the process of reliably deploying artifacts to the cloud, leveraging industry best practices out-of-the-box.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    Muhammad Arsalan N.
    MN
    Flexible tool to integrate with jenkins pipeline and deployment on cloud.

    Reviewers say compared to Travis CI, Spinnaker is:

    More expensive
    #20
    #20
  39. GitHub

    (1,508)4.6 out of 5

    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over two million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:
  40. GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over two million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

    Categories in common with Travis CI:

    Andriy S.
    AS
    The first and probably the most important advantage of Github is its perfect compliance with git version control. And git is the version control system, so any team member can join the team with...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to Travis CI, GitHub is:

    Slower to reach roi
    More expensive
    Better at support