Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Alternatives & Competitors
(100)4.5 out of 5
Looking for alternatives to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform? Tons of people want Configuration Management Software. What's difficult is finding out whether or not the software you choose is right for you. GitLab, CircleCI, Jenkins, and Chef are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.
Top Alternatives to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
- GitLab
- CircleCI
- Jenkins
- Chef
- Octopus Deploy
- Puppet Enterprise
- CloudBees CodeShip
- TeamCity
- GitLab(291)4.4 out of 5
An open source web interface and source control platform based on Git.
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - CircleCI(385)4.4 out of 5Optimized for quick response
CircleCI gives you all the benefits of continuous integration with none of the headaches of maintaining it.
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - Jenkins(300)4.3 out of 5
Jenkins is an application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - Chef(40)4.0 out of 5
Chef turns infrastructure into code. With Chef, you can automate how you build, deploy, and manage your infrastructure. Your infrastructure becomes as versionable, testable, and repeatable as application code.
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - Octopus Deploy(40)4.3 out of 5
Octopus works with your build server to enable reliable, secure, automated releases of ASP.NET applications and Windows Services into test, staging and production environments, whether they are in the cloud or on-premises.
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - Puppet Enterprise(36)4.2 out of 5
Deliver and operate constantly modern software with the leading infrastructure-as-code platform.
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - CloudBees CodeShip(159)4.3 out of 5Optimized for quick response
Codeship offers hosted continuous integration and deployment for your web apps, including rails, php, python, java or go apps.
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - TeamCity(63)4.3 out of 5
One reason TeamCity is dubbed an "Intelligent CI server" is its approach to integration. When we say we support a tool, we mean it in every way possible. For example, support for Visual Studio projects provides automatic detection of tool versions, testing frameworks support, code coverage, static code analysis, and more.
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - Bamboo(53)4.1 out of 5
Bamboo does more than just run builds and tests. It connects issues, commits, test results, and deploys so the whole picture is available to your entire product team- from project managers, to devs and testers, to sys admins.
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - AWS CodePipeline(31)4.0 out of 5
AWS CodePipeline is a continuous integration and continuous delivery service for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates.
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - Hashicorp Terraform(32)4.7 out of 5
Hashicorp Terraform is a tool that collaborate on infrastructure changes to reduce errors and simplify recovery.
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - Spinnaker(15)4.2 out of 5
Spinnaker helps codify the process of reliably deploying artifacts to the cloud, leveraging industry best practices out-of-the-box.
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - Microsoft Team Foundation Server(136)4.1 out of 5
An enterprise-grade server for teams to share code, track work, and ship software — for any language, all in a single package. It’s the perfect complement to your IDE.
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - Semaphore(127)4.7 out of 5
Semaphore is a hosted continuous integration and deployment service for open source and private projects.
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - Travis CI(80)4.6 out of 5
Test and Deploy with Confidence. Easily sync your GitHub projects with Travis CI and you'll be testing your code in minutes!
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - SaltStack(79)4.3 out of 5Optimized for quick response
Systems and configuration management software
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - CloudBees CI(249)4.2 out of 5Optimized for quick response
CloudBees provides solutions that enable DevOps teams to respond rapidly to the software delivery needs of the business.
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - Azure Automation(36)4.5 out of 5
Azure Automation delivers a cloud-based automation and configuration service that provides consistent management across your Azure and non-Azure environments. It consists of process automation, update management, and configuration features.
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - Azure Pipelines(17)4.6 out of 5
Automate your builds and deployments with Pipelines so you spend less time with the nuts and bolts and more time being creative
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: - Postman(604)4.6 out of 5
Postman is a software that helps developers and companies develope API workflow, it is efficient on Chrome to test, develop and document APIs and create complex requests, go back in time and view results in a beautiful way.
Categories in common with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform:
#1
1K
The best thing that I like about GitLab is that it is open source. Moreover it offer unlimited private repositories without limitation of contributors, when compared to GitHub. GitHub offers only 3...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, GitLab is:
Slower to reach roi
Easier to do business with
More expensive
#2
SC
Maintenance of standards in code formatting and layout styles.
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, CircleCI is:
Slower to reach roi
More expensive
Easier to do business with
#3
EY
Open source Product, open to integrating with a lot of the third parties, it's an easy system to manage all integration platform
Jenkins is open-source software that facilitates the continuous...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Jenkins is:
Slower to reach roi
#4
CM
I like chef because it uses DSL for configuration instead of XML, Rackspace supports it very well, etc. However the absolute best thing about Chef is the concept of recipes where you can get your...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Chef is:
Slower to reach roi
More expensive
#5
AC
octopus deploy is able to distribute the software on multiple types of platforms, using simple complex deployment scripts.
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Octopus Deploy is:
Slower to reach roi
More expensive
#6
JT
Working for a data company, we're always pushing the envelope on data visualizations. We love Reflect's responsiveness in the data management tools that let us push evolutionary changes for...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Puppet Enterprise is:
Slower to reach roi
More expensive
Easier to do business with
#7
BA
We started with Codeship Basic for most of our projects. This turned out to be super simple to set up and get running. Once the company grew and we needed more features out of our CI/CD system, we...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, CloudBees CodeShip is:
Slower to reach roi
More expensive
Better at support
#8
UM
Once setup and configured, it's incredibly easy to test and release a piece of code, and diagnose problems across multiple teams using the online platform. Highly customisable, such as which...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, TeamCity is:
Slower to reach roi
More expensive
#9
IS
Bamboo is one of the best tool for the build automation. Using bamboo a lot of time is saved as it would take more time to generate the build manually. Using bamboo one can easily achieve...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Bamboo is:
Slower to reach roi
More expensive
#10
UH
It is capable of running any platform, has scale-ability that is on par or better than the competitors. Also its integration with Github and other third party vendors allows us to use exactly what...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, AWS CodePipeline is:
Slower to reach roi
More expensive
Better at support
#11
AT
Integration with packer and ansible is good.
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Hashicorp Terraform is:
Easier to set up
#12
AJ
The platform for getting software live in the cloud it's very easy and pretty fun to use. All you do is get the info synced and that's it
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Spinnaker is:
More expensive
#13
UO
The ability to keep codebase version control, automated and manual test cases and tasks all together in order and ease of access.
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Microsoft Team Foundation Server is:
Slower to reach roi
More expensive
#14
BP
I've been doing CI/CD for more than 15 years, helping teams start doing it, improve their means to do it, and in general making it *boring*. In other words, removing the drama and headaches that...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Semaphore is:
Slower to reach roi
Better at support
Easier to do business with
#15
IL
I knew the tool thanks to the Github platform, it seemed extraordinary the integration that these two platforms have, just by doing 'push' to my repository I could automate validation, integration...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Travis CI is:
Slower to reach roi
Easier to do business with
Better at meeting requirements
#16
RM
The best thing about saltstack is that it supports jinja2 inside manifest files too unlike ansible where you can define those things only inside templates.
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, SaltStack is:
Slower to reach roi
More expensive
Easier to do business with
#17
AK
We have a Java based project which we wanted to migrate from Bamboo to CloudBees CI. Best features which CloudBees CI offers is different level of Pipeline security and feasible way of securing...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, CloudBees CI is:
Slower to reach roi
More expensive
Better at support
#18
AU
Very Helpful in security and infrastructure automation with Flexiblility to choose scripting language
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Azure Automation is:
Slower to reach roi
More expensive
Better at support
#19
MR
Pipelines works for almost any deployment, to any environment, we use Pipelines primarily for out git repositories and deployment to Azure App Services and Functions.
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Azure Pipelines is:
Slower to reach roi
More expensive
Easier to admin
#20
JV
Postman has a well-organized user interface. And I have been in love with the dark theme ever since they released it. Postman support many API schemas including OpenAPI, RAML, and GraphQL. It has...Read more
Reviewers say compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Postman is:
Slower to reach roi
Easier to do business with
Easier to set up
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy