What I like best about QA Touch is how simple and organized it makes test case management and bug tracking. The interface is easy to use, collaboration between QA and development teams is smooth, and it helps keep the entire testing process centralized. I also like the integrations and reporting features, which make it easier to track progress and improve overall QA efficiency. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I dislike about QA Touch is that some features can feel a bit limited compared to more advanced QA management tools, especially when working with large-scale projects. The UI can occasionally feel slow, and certain workflows could be more customizable to improve efficiency. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

what i really appreciate about qa touch is how intuitive it feels right from day one. as a product manager at enrich money, i was looking for a testing tool that wouldn't require weeks of training for our team. the interface is clean and doesn't overwhelm you with unnecessary features.

the test case management is particularly well thought out ,we can organize our test suites in a way that actually makes sense for our fintech products. the real-time collaboration features have been a game changer for our distributed team. our qa engineers in different locations can update test results instantly, and i get notifications about critical bugs without having to constantly check the platform.

integration with jira was surprisingly smooth. we had it up and running in less than an hour, and now our bug tracking flows seamlessly between qa touch and our existing workflow. the reporting dashboard gives me exactly what i need for stakeholder meetings , clear metrics without having to export and manipulate data in excel. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

honestly, there are a few rough edges. the mobile app could use some work ,it's functional but not as polished as the web version. sometimes when we're testing on the go, the interface feels cramped on smaller screens.

the automation integration options are somewhat limited compared to some enterprise solutions we evaluated. while it covers the basics with selenium and jenkins, we'd love to see more native integrations with newer automation frameworks.

pricing can add up quickly as you scale. we started with a small team and the cost was reasonable, but as we've grown, the per-user pricing model has become a significant line item in our testing budget. would appreciate more flexible pricing tiers for growing teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about QA Touch is how simple and intuitive it is to use. As someone who manages test cases daily, the UI makes it really easy to organize, execute, and track everything without feeling overwhelmed. It didn’t take long at all to get the team onboarded—implementation was smooth and straightforward. Within a day or two, everyone was using it comfortably.

We especially like the integration with Jira, which helps link our test cases directly with the dev workflow. It's also nice being able to collaborate within the platform, leave comments, and assign test cases to team members—all in one place. We use it almost daily during sprints, and it fits well into our agile process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While QA Touch covers the essentials well, the reporting features could use more flexibility. Sometimes we need more customizable dashboards or visual reports to share with stakeholders. And when handling large-scale test suites, it can slow down a bit during bulk uploads or large batch edits. But those are minor compared to the value it brings on a daily basis. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about QA Touch is its all-in-one platform that brings test case management, issue tracking, and reporting together in a clean and user-friendly interface. It integrates well with tools like JIRA and GitHub, which helps streamline workflows between QA and development teams. I also appreciate its customizable dashboards and detailed test execution reports, which make it easier to track progress, identify blockers, and communicate status clearly. Overall, QA Touch improves team collaboration and increases testing efficiency without the complexity of traditional QA tools Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While QA Touch is a helpful and user-friendly tool, one area for improvement is its performance with large test suites — sometimes it becomes a bit slow or laggy when managing or executing a high number of test cases. Additionally, the UI can feel slightly limited in terms of layout customization, and certain advanced features like automation integration or detailed filters could be more robust. However, these are manageable issues, and overall, the tool is still effective for most QA workflows Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really appreciated the feature set and the flexibility offered by the free plan—it made exploring the app a great experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Initially, I found the user interface a bit confusing, and it took me some time to understand how to navigate through the features effectively. I felt slightly disoriented at first, but with a bit of exploration, things gradually started making sense. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The AI feature in this test management tool helps to write test cases very quickly, increasing the productivity of the team. And the number of custom dashboard support helps us to get the insights clearly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

User navigation and user interface look a bit cumbersome. Make it more user-friendly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like how QA Touch is easy to use, and having an option to use it either in a web browser or to download as application makes it so easy to use daily. Using it with free plan, even though it only covers basic functionalities, is great solution, especially because you can connect your test cases with Jira, and all bug tracking i test cases management tools that we all use daily. Th UX is also very easy to navigate and you get familiar pretty quick to using it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's great to have a free plan that has so much functionalities included, but it is for small teams. If your team is more than 2 person. this option is not gonna work anymore and you will have to switch to some of the paid plans. But for single user it is more than enough. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

QA Touch is a very user-friendly tool for managing software testing. The interface is simple and easy to navigate, which makes handling test cases, test plans, and bug reports hassle-free. What I like the most is how easily we can organize and track test cases across different projects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The initial setup can also take some time, as there’s a small learning curve to understand all the features properly. Additionally, some advanced features are available only in the premium version, which could be a limitation for smaller teams or those with budget constraints. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Working in fintech, maintaining regulatory standards in testing is critical, and QA Touch makes this easier with structured requirements management and detailed audit trails. The ability to link user stories to test cases ensures that all compliance requirements are properly tested before release. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI could use some refinements for a more modern experience. Also, while the integration with Jira is great, direct support for test automation reporting from tools like Selenium or Cypress would make it even better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Test runs included test plan components to describe and support BDD import xml. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Link JIRA issue should be visible once user clicks on bugs icon in test case during test execution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.