I love how Originality.AI helps me ensure my content is free from plagiarism by quickly scanning materials. It has an intuitive layout that allows me to find the features I need with ease, whether checking for plagiarism or reviewing reports. The user-friendly interface really enhances my experience. I appreciate the responsive customer support, exemplified by Anna, who took the time to understand my issues and provided tailored solutions, making me feel valued as a user and efficiently resolving my concerns. The ease of the registration process also made the initial setup very smooth for me. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the current subscription fee of Originality.AI can be a barrier for users in poorer countries. Additionally, there is a need for better integration with more writing tools that are prevalent in the current era, such as Google Docs, MS Word, API access, and SEO optimization tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love how Originality.AI allows me to diligently check for AI-generated content and plagiarism in my articles and write-ups, ensuring that my work maintains its integrity and originality. The feature that helps me identify whether AI was used in creating a paper or an assignment is incredibly valuable to me. This capability enables me to refine and improve those sections before finalizing my work, boosting my confidence that my submissions are authentic and credible. The initial setup was straightforward, which made it easier for me to start using the tool effectively. Additionally, I appreciate that Originality.AI plays a central role in my workflow, as I rely on it 90% of the time, complementing it occasionally with other tools like Quillbot. This seamless integration into my process highlights its efficiency and effectiveness, and it’s a testament to why I'm very likely to recommend it to others. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find that sometimes Originality.AI mistakenly identifies my original work and tables as AI-generated content. This misidentification could be improved by implementing a more accurate detection method, particularly when my analysis is similar to existing work. It impedes my workflow and requires additional corrections. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate the basic scanning feature of Originality.AI, which gives us the confidence needed when addressing student work for academic integrity purposes. Knowing that there is a high likelihood a piece might not be original helps in making informed decisions when discussions and consequences are necessary. I also appreciate the information provided by an Originality.AI Customer Service Representative, Anna, about the Chrome extension that allows us to see the writing process. Although I haven't used the extension yet, I am excited about its potential usefulness in our academic setting. The initial setup of Originality.AI was very easy, which made integrating it into our system seamless. Additionally, I have confidence in the reliability of Originality.AI's product, as it was chosen after thorough market research determined it was the best fit for our needs. I also think the customer service is top notch. Anna solved my issue in a matter of minutes! This makes me confident in your product/service. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the report could be more in-depth and perhaps providing analysis of why they think certain portions of writing are AI-written would be helpful. Right now, the only information we have is likelihood. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find Originality.AI incredibly valuable for its ability to detect AI use in the documents I evaluate. This is essential for ensuring the authenticity of content, as I'm especially keen on identifying potential AI involvement. The detailed explanations provided by Ellie, regarding different scanning levels like lighter scans and academic scans, were extremely helpful. The advice on using the Deep Scan to possibly improve my writing suggests the platform's versatility and depth. Additionally, I appreciated how intuitive and easy the initial setup of Originality.AI was, which allowed me to get started without any hitches. Overall, these features collectively contribute to a reassuring and efficient user experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I encountered false positives during my first scan with Originality.AI, which was confusing and seemed incorrect since the material was my own work. Although I received helpful assistance in understanding different scanning options, it wasn’t immediately clear how these options should be used. This shows there is room for improvement in how the software communicates its functionalities to the user. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find Originality.AI pretty cool and appreciate how well it functions as a software tool for detecting the percentage of content related to AI. It's valuable to me in highlighting how many artificial sentences are present in my work, helping me make the right decisions about sentence structure. This feature is particularly impressive because it provides insight into the writing process, ensuring my essays maintain originality. Overall, Originality.AI supports me effectively in identifying AI-generated content, making it a good companion in enhancing the quality of my work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find that sometimes Originality.AI does not accurately notify me about artificial sentences I have written myself. There seems to be an issue with the system detecting sentences as AI-generated even when they are not, which can be confusing. Additionally, it appears that the software struggles to distinguish between the similarities of my writing and other works, which affects its accuracy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really appreciate the detailed feedback that Originality.AI provides, as it vastly improves my understanding of AI detection in my work. The detection capabilities are exceptionally good, which enhances my confidence in assessing whether AI was used or not. It's fascinating to see how Originality.AI not only detects AI usage but also aids in correcting my paragraphs, making them structurally sound and flawless. This level of detail and precision significantly benefits me by allowing for a smooth, natural flow in the written content. Additionally, the initial setup of Originality.AI was quite straightforward, thanks to the detailed instructions, which made the whole process easy for me. These features collectively make Originality.AI invaluable to my workflow, and I am very likely to recommend it to others, evidenced by my scoring it a perfect 10 on the likelihood of recommendation scale. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

nothing but the credit is little expensive Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Originality.AI for ensuring that my academic writings are not erroneously flagged by Language Learning Models (LLMs), which is incredibly helpful for my publications. I love how it improves the clarity of my writing, making sure my thoughts are conveyed effectively. Additionally, the customer service provided by Originality.AI stands out as a notable strength, offering support that feels both immediate and substantial. The ease of the initial setup was a pleasant surprise, allowing me to start using the service without any hassle, which is a testament to its thoughtful design and user-friendliness. Ellie was awesome and did a great job helping me! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I dislike that Originality.AI sometimes inaccurately flags my writing as AI-generated, particularly because I am a healthcare professional who uses formal language in my publications. This misidentification of formal writing as AI content is concerning. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that I can quickly scan written content for AI and plagiarism. The two models for scanning content for AI are also helpful (one allows written content that has been lightly edited by AI to pass, while the other detects any AI involvement). I've used Originality.AI for a while now, and it seems like the accuracy has evolved over time. At first, it used to flag my writing as AI even if I didn't use any AI for editing, but it's gotten a lot better in the last year! I also like that I can purchase credits to use as needed. The support has also been really responsive and helpful (Ellie from support was quick to answer my questions and even helped me rescan some content to double-check accuracy without using more credits). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Occasionally, it does flag human-written content as possibly AI, but for the most part it's been pretty accurate in the last year or so. I contact support through chat when needed, and they've always responded right away. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like Originality.AI for its reliability in verifying the use of artificial intelligence in texts. This feature provides confidence in the results I obtain. I also appreciate the AI content scanner, which is a crucial tool for my analyses, ensuring that I can evaluate texts efficiently and effectively. Additionally, the initial setup of Originality.AI was easy, which facilitated my adaptation to the software and its continuous use without complications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The difference between the 'modes' in the AI Content Scanner could be more explicit, including clear guidelines on the recommended use for each mode. This is because I tried a mode that did not give me the correct score, as I should have used another mode more suitable for the analysis I wanted to perform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's accurate (in its latest models). I like the formatting of the analysis with the sentence-by-sentence breakdown. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The current models are great (Lite 1.0.2 and turbo 3.0.2) but the ones before that, especially lite 1.0.1, was awful. I got so many false positives.

The downloadable report should display the text of the output in a way that is easier to see. The pale green and pale yellow are difficult to read and don't give much indication of the sentence-by-sentence breakdown. The only part of that report that is useful to me is the result (i.e. "100% Original")and the percentage.

Also it would be nice if the result history didn't clear after just 30 days, because if I give a client the link to the results page they will lose access to that information after a short time, and that can be frustrating. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.