Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Opentext functional Testing and Opentext functional Testing for Developers 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Mid-Market (63.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Opentext functional Testing
Star Rating
(46)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Opentext functional TestingOpentext functional Testing for Developers
Star Rating
(12)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (63.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Opentext functional Testing for DevelopersSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText UFT One excels in its Test Variety, scoring 8.3, which allows for a broader range of testing scenarios compared to OpenText UFT Developer, which has a lower score in this area. Reviewers mention that this flexibility is crucial for enterprise-level applications.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText UFT One has a higher score in Test Feedback at 8.1, indicating that users find it easier to gather and analyze feedback from their tests, while UFT Developer's feedback mechanisms are perceived as less robust.
- G2 users highlight that OpenText UFT One's Reliability score of 7.7 is a significant advantage, as it ensures consistent performance during automated testing, whereas UFT Developer has not received the same level of praise in this area.
- Users on G2 report that OpenText UFT One's customization capabilities, rated at 8.1, allow for tailored testing solutions that meet specific business needs, while UFT Developer's customization options are seen as more limited, which can hinder flexibility.
- Reviewers say that the Quality of Support for OpenText UFT One, with a score of 8.5, is a strong point, as many users appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, contrasting with UFT Developer's lower support rating of 8.1.
- Users say that the product direction for OpenText UFT One, rated at 8.1, indicates a positive outlook for future updates and features, while UFT Developer's score of 4.8 raises concerns about its long-term viability and commitment to innovation.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Opentext functional Testing
No pricing availableOpentext functional Testing for Developers
No pricing availableFree Trial
Opentext functional Testing
No trial information availableOpentext functional Testing for Developers
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
40
8.5
9
Ease of Use
8.1
39
8.3
9
Ease of Setup
8.1
19
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.2
18
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.5
38
8.3
8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
16
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
37
4.2
8
Features by Category
Functionality
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Automation
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Opentext functional Testing and Opentext functional Testing for Developers are categorized as Automation Testing and Software Testing
Unique Categories
Opentext functional Testing has no unique categories
Opentext functional Testing for Developers has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Opentext functional Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
35.6%
Computer Software
15.6%
Banking
6.7%
Hospital & Health Care
4.4%
Education Management
4.4%
Other
33.3%
Computer Software
45.5%
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Consulting
9.1%
Financial Services
9.1%
Consumer Goods
9.1%
Other
9.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
Which feature of Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing displays VBScript code?
1 Comment
SZ
Expert View, In this the users can view and edit the test's source code using VBScriptRead more
Opentext functional Testing has no more discussions with answers
Opentext functional Testing for Developers has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
