--- title: OpenText Application Quality Management Reviews meta_title: 'OpenText Application Quality Management Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter 133 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how OpenText Application Quality Management works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.0 review_count: 133 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-09-22' parent_category: name: Development url: https://www.g2.com/categories/development ---

OpenText Application Quality Management Reviews & Product Details

Profile Status

This profile is currently managed by OpenText Application Quality Management but has limited features.

Are you part of the OpenText Application Quality Management team? Upgrade your plan to enhance your branding and engage with visitors to your profile!

Value at a Glance

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

4 months

Return on Investment

20 months

User Insights

Average based on 133 real user reviews.

Implementation Time

4 months

Perceived Cost

$$$$$
Verified User in Biotechnology
GB
Verified User in Biotechnology
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Best tool ever ALM"
4.5/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

Best tool for testing, defect tracking and management. Quality Center is a Web-based test management tool, you can organize and manage all phases of the application testing process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

Initial learning curve is a bit steep due to signs Limited web browsers are supported Few times application freezes with no error Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Renan G.
RG
Renan G.
Test Manager
Information Technology and Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Very good, complete, but you need a powerful server and computer to use it"
5/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

There is everything necessary to the whole software testing life cycle and it's all customizable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

It is slow and freezes sometimes, nothing else. I like HP ALM very much and intend to keep working with it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
GI
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"HPE Quality Center review"
4/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

Very good team tool for managing project testing workflow. Very good for managing the testing process. You can write test cases and share with the QC team. Very good collaboration capabilities. Importing test cases from Excel to QC is very easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

Sometimes it becomes difficult to link found defects to a test case. Very expensie. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Vijayan A.
VA
Vijayan A.
Senior QA Lead
Airlines/Aviation
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"One stop shop product for QA needs"
5/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

BPT, Requirement management, Test case and Run management, Integration with UFT. It is a completely centralized test management tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

multi word defect search by summary, select and right click on test lab, defect, Google chrome not supported Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Services
GI
Verified User in Information Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Navigation is tricky"
3/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

Many aspects of the work can be done on the same application

- bug tracking

-configuration templates

-pushing configs thru snmp

-enabling tacacs Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

Navigation is tricky.

Less folders with lot of menu items.

Folder with mis-leading names Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
GI
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"QC is the single source of truth for test and defect management"
5/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

I like the ability to customize workflows and get an accurate view of quality activities in one place. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

Some of the app still relies on legacy technology (Active X) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
GI
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"HP QC"
4.5/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

Test cases management, easy to maintain. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

Need better help section for newbies..!! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Defense & Space
UD
Verified User in Defense & Space
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"IV&V testing of a java based application in government space."
4/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

I like the integration of ALM with the other HP products (UFT and LoadRunner) used for testing, and the ability it provides to create dashboards and summarize all relevant information into one view. This helps provide leadership great insight into testing activities and progress during software releases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

I dislike some of the limitations of special characters. This can make integration and the syncing of data with other tools being used to manage software development more challenging than it needs to be. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
CI
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"HP ALM Review William Havard"
3.5/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

I like the integration with other tools such as HP Sprinter. As a test designer I mostly use the test part of the software. In this section I like the business components part because HP keeps it pretty simple and not too loaded with information. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

As a test designer, I dislike the configuration part of the testing tool, which is in my opinion too complex and not user friendly. For example, when you modify parameters in your business components, the parameters don't update automatically. You have to delete the parameters and the business components from the flow and then reload the business components with the modified parameters. Also, I think that HP should give us more flexibility regarding the manual implementation of the business components. For example, it would be great if we could have dynamic business components that evolve with the value that is assigned. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
UI
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Average"
2.5/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

Tracking the stage of development in a defect. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

ALM client itself take a loot on system. It should be web based and light weight so that opening and closing it doesn't scare the developers. Tool itself behaves little buggy. Like defect detail window retains its position on Multiple monitors, and when second monitor is unplugged, then also defect details show up somewhere else but not on the main screen. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Questions about OpenText Application Quality Management? Ask real users or explore answers from the community

Get practical answers, real workflows, and honest pros and cons from the G2 community or share your insights.

Mani Teja P.
MP
Mani Teja Punna
•
Last activity over 6 years ago

How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?

GU
Guest User

What is Micro Focus ALM Quality Center used for?

0 Upvotes
0
Join the conversation

Pricing Insights

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

4 months

Return on Investment

20 months

Perceived Cost

$$$$$
OpenText Application Quality Management Comparisons
OpenText Application Quality Management Features
Test Repository
Integration
Test Diversity
Reporting
Version Control
Scaling
User Reports & Feedback
Tester Reports & Feedback
Team Reports & Comments
Analytics
Bug History
Data Retention