NMI Payments Pricing Overview

NMI Payments Pricing Reviews

(2)
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
UI
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Developer-Friendly APIs and Robust Customization"
5/5
What do you like best about NMI Payments?

This platform offers developer-friendly APIs and is highly flexible and customizable. It also provides strong white-label capabilities and supports a wide integration ecosystem. The reporting and analytics features are robust, and it includes omnichannel support. Overall, the developer-friendly APIs make it particularly appealing for technical users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about NMI Payments?

This product relies on third-party dependencies, and its user interface appears outdated when compared to more modern gateways. The documentation can be quite dense, making it challenging to navigate at times. Support response times are inconsistent, and there are limited features available out of the box. Additionally, new users may find the learning curve to be quite steep. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Joshua B.
JB
Joshua B.
Chief Executive Officer
Financial Services
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Support Decline and Slow Development Undermine the Experience"
1.5/5
What do you like best about NMI Payments?

The total ecosystem of products is nice. There could be better synergy between the products, from login, data, and a single UI, as with the CRM and gateway. They have added some modern integrations to better compete in the market, such as Shopify and Bill Connect, but they came very late compared to competitors and market saturation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about NMI Payments?

Customer support has been slipping over the past 2 years. They acquired too many different companies in a short period of time and have neglected their core business. Development completes half a project and takes years to finish a product development, as was the case with Collect Checkout. It took 2 years for them to add donation and recurring transactions to replace QuickClick. Another example was their invoice module, which has been known for 5 years, that it needed improvement, but they opted to integrate a 3rd party with costs 2 or 3 times more than improving their simple internal invoicing. Simple features such as a QuickBooks transactional sync, which at this point almost every gateway offers, are only available through a 3rd party and at additional costs. The four price increases over a period of 14 months were a little much. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.