NGP VAN Pricing Overview

I tell candidates that the cost of NGP VAN is justified by focusing on voters most likely to vote. I also use voter extracts to identify mail in ballots received including what party and which ones were cast. Extracts of petitions signed for various causes also help. Integration with such tools as Hustle (though this can be better) all add to the power. In the end the benefit is contacting the most, best voters possible, and while not wasting resources on ones less likely to vote. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One might consider the web interface clumsy but the cost of educating thousands of activists on something new would be difficult. More features in Mini Van that emulate cusomization for paper sheets would be great. I like to have hints about a voter that can be used at a door. For example, did they sign a particular petition of note? Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use NGP VAN primarily within our political organization to efficiently manage donor information, streamline compliance with FEC filings, and track donor activity over time. It helps us quickly compile top-line donor statistics, ensuring our reporting is accurate and up-to-date for strategic decision-making and compliance purposes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

NGP VAN is less appropriate for organizations that aren’t experienced with complex software contracts, as it has aggressive pricing strategies that can exceed the stated list price, auto-renewing contracts that can catch users off guard, and billing practices that often include unclear or non-transparent line items. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.