# Best Platforms for External Threat Surface Monitoring

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">When it comes to cybersecurity, one of the toughest challenges is keeping track of assets and exposures that live outside of your direct control. <strong>External threat surface monitoring platforms</strong> help organizations continuously discover, track, and secure internet-facing assets while flagging risks before they can be exploited. Based on the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/attack-surface-management">Attack Surface Management category on G2</a>, here are some of the standout tools worth considering:</p><ul><li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-defender-external-attack-surface-management/reviews"><strong>Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management</strong></a><strong> – Best for Enterprise Cloud Ecosystems</strong>
</li></ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">This solution automatically maps an organization’s external presence, uncovering unknown and unmanaged assets. It’s tightly integrated with Microsoft’s broader security stack, making it a strong fit for enterprises already using Defender or Azure services.</p><ul><li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/recorded-future/reviews"><strong>Recorded Future</strong></a><strong> – Best for Threat Intelligence–Driven Monitoring</strong>
</li></ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Recorded Future combines ASM with rich threat intelligence to give context around exposures. By tying findings to attacker activity and dark web chatter, it helps teams prioritize external risks that are actively being targeted.</p><ul><li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ctm360-ctm360/reviews"><strong>CTM360</strong></a><strong> – Best for Global Digital Risk Protection</strong>
</li></ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">CTM360 specializes in monitoring the wider digital footprint—detecting phishing sites, impersonation attempts, credential leaks, and rogue assets. It’s built for organizations that need to manage threats across geographies and industries.</p><ul><li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/socradar-extended-threat-intelligence/reviews"><strong>SOCRadar</strong></a><strong> – Best for Extended Threat Intelligence</strong>
</li></ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">SOCRadar provides a blend of external attack surface monitoring and contextual intelligence. It not only identifies exposed assets but also tracks how cybercriminals are discussing and potentially exploiting them.</p><ul><li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/cloudsek/reviews"><strong>CloudSEK</strong></a><strong> – Best for Risk Prioritization with Threat Actor Insights</strong>
</li></ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">CloudSEK brings together ASM and threat intel, highlighting exposed infrastructure while correlating findings with current malicious campaigns. This intelligence-driven approach helps teams cut through noise and focus on the most urgent risks.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">If your security team has tested any of these platforms, how effective have they been at reducing blind spots across your external environment? Did threat intel make a noticeable difference in how you prioritized fixes?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 11 months ago
- Author title: SEO Specialist at G2 | AEO &amp;amp; LLM Visibility | Programmatic SEO | B2B SaaS Organic Growth
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;We compared SOCRadar and Recorded Future side by side, and the biggest difference was in how they presented intelligence around external exposures. Recorded Future had deeper intel feeds, while SOCRadar provided more visibility into attacker chatter. Both helped us prioritize faster than ASM-only platforms. Has anyone else done a head-to-head comparison?&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 11 months ago
- Author title: SEO Specialist at G2 | AEO &amp;amp; LLM Visibility | Programmatic SEO | B2B SaaS Organic Growth





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4