# Top 10 EndNote Alternatives & Competitors
**Average Rating:** 4.1/5
**Total Number of Reviews:** 183
EndNote is not the only option for Reference Management Software. Explore other competing options and alternatives. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to EndNote include user interface. The best overall EndNote alternative is Mendeley. Other similar apps like EndNote are ReadCube, EasyBib.com, Zotero, and Sciwheel. EndNote alternatives can be found in [Reference Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/reference-management).


## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to EndNote
  - [Mendeley](https://www.g2.com/products/mendeley/reviews)
  - [ReadCube](https://www.g2.com/products/readcube/reviews)
  - [EasyBib.com](https://www.g2.com/products/easybib-com/reviews)
  - [Zotero](https://www.g2.com/products/zotero/reviews)
  - [Sciwheel](https://www.g2.com/products/sciwheel/reviews)
  - [RefWorks](https://www.g2.com/products/refworks/reviews)
  - [Paperpile](https://www.g2.com/products/paperpile/reviews)
  - [Citavi](https://www.g2.com/products/citavi/reviews)
  - [JabRef](https://www.g2.com/products/jabref/reviews)
  - [Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)](https://www.g2.com/products/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme/reviews)

## Top 10 Alternatives to EndNote Recently Reviewed By G2 Community
Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how EndNote stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Higher Education, Medical Practice, and Health, Wellness and Fitness, and find the best product for your business.


  ### 1. [Mendeley](https://www.g2.com/products/mendeley/reviews)
By Mendeley
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 250
Mendeley Reference Manager is a comprehensive, free tool designed to streamline the process of managing and sharing research references. It enables users to effortlessly import, organize, and annotate PDFs, facilitating efficient collaboration and citation generation. By integrating with Microsoft Word through the Mendeley Cite add-in, it allows for seamless insertion of citations and bibliographies directly into documents. The platform's cloud-based architecture ensures that your library is accessible and synchronized across multiple devices, enhancing productivity and collaboration among researchers. Key Features and Functionality: - Effortless Importing: Quickly add PDFs or entire folders to your library with a single click or by dragging and dropping. - Web Integration: Utilize the Mendeley Web Importer to collect and organize references while browsing online, ensuring no source is overlooked. - Automatic Organization: Set up watched folders to automatically import and organize new PDFs added to designated desktop folders. - Collaborative Research: Create shared libraries with colleagues or co-authors, allowing for real-time collaboration, annotation, and alignment on research materials. - Seamless Citation: Insert citations and generate bibliographies directly within Microsoft Word using the Mendeley Cite add-in, streamlining the writing process. Primary Value and User Solutions: Mendeley Reference Manager addresses the common challenges researchers face in organizing and citing references. By providing a unified platform for reference management, annotation, and collaboration, it simplifies the research workflow, reduces the risk of losing important sources, and enhances the efficiency of writing scholarly documents. Its cloud-based system ensures that your research materials are always backed up and accessible, promoting seamless collaboration and productivity.


Reviewers say compared to EndNote, Mendeley is:
- Easier to admin
- Easier to set up
- More usable
Categories in common with EndNote: [Reference Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/reference-management)

**Compare:** [EndNote vs Mendeley](https://www.g2.com/compare/endnote-vs-mendeley)
**Compare Mendeley with other alternatives:**
- [Mendeley vs ReadCube](https://www.g2.com/compare/mendeley-vs-readcube)
- [Mendeley vs EasyBib.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/easybib-com-vs-mendeley)
- [Mendeley vs Zotero](https://www.g2.com/compare/mendeley-vs-zotero)
- [Mendeley vs Sciwheel](https://www.g2.com/compare/mendeley-vs-sciwheel)
- [Mendeley vs RefWorks](https://www.g2.com/compare/mendeley-vs-refworks)
- [Mendeley vs Paperpile](https://www.g2.com/compare/mendeley-vs-paperpile)
- [Mendeley vs Citavi](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-mendeley)
- [Mendeley vs JabRef](https://www.g2.com/compare/jabref-vs-mendeley)
- [Mendeley vs Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme-vs-mendeley)

  ### 2. [ReadCube](https://www.g2.com/products/readcube/reviews)
By ReadCube
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 174
ReadCube and Papers by ReadCube help you collect and curate the research materials that you need. Our award winning literature management platform is more than just a reference manager; it will significantly improve the way you find, organize, read, cite and share scholarly research.


Reviewers say compared to EndNote, ReadCube is:
- Easier to admin
- More usable
- Better at support
Categories in common with EndNote: [Reference Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/reference-management)

**Compare:** [EndNote vs ReadCube](https://www.g2.com/compare/endnote-vs-readcube)
**Compare ReadCube with other alternatives:**
- [ReadCube vs Mendeley](https://www.g2.com/compare/mendeley-vs-readcube)
- [ReadCube vs EasyBib.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/easybib-com-vs-readcube)
- [ReadCube vs Zotero](https://www.g2.com/compare/readcube-vs-zotero)
- [ReadCube vs Sciwheel](https://www.g2.com/compare/readcube-vs-sciwheel)
- [ReadCube vs RefWorks](https://www.g2.com/compare/readcube-vs-refworks)
- [ReadCube vs Paperpile](https://www.g2.com/compare/paperpile-vs-readcube)
- [ReadCube vs Citavi](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-readcube)
- [ReadCube vs JabRef](https://www.g2.com/compare/jabref-vs-readcube)
- [ReadCube vs Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme-vs-readcube)

  ### 3. [EasyBib.com](https://www.g2.com/products/easybib-com/reviews)
By Chegg
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 152
EasyBib is an intuitive online platform designed to assist students and researchers in creating accurate citations and bibliographies across various citation styles, including MLA, APA, and Chicago/Turabian. Beyond citation generation, EasyBib offers tools for note-taking, research organization, and writing enhancement, making it a comprehensive resource for academic writing. Key Features and Functionality: - Citation Generator: Automatically generates citations for a wide array of sources, such as books, websites, and journal articles, supporting over 7,000 citation styles. - Plagiarism Checker: Scans documents against a vast database to identify potential instances of plagiarism, ensuring the originality of the content. - Grammar and Writing Assistant: Provides real-time feedback on grammar, spelling, and punctuation, helping users enhance the clarity and coherence of their writing. - Note-Taking and Research Tools: Allows users to take notes, organize research materials, and link them directly to their citations for streamlined project management. - Integration with Writing Platforms: Seamlessly integrates with tools like Google Docs, enabling users to manage citations and bibliographies within their writing environment. Primary Value and User Solutions: EasyBib simplifies the often complex process of citation creation and research organization, enabling users to focus more on content development rather than formatting details. By offering tools that check for plagiarism and grammatical errors, it ensures the integrity and quality of academic work. This comprehensive suite of features supports students and researchers in producing well-organized, original, and properly cited documents, thereby enhancing their academic performance and writing proficiency.


Reviewers say compared to EndNote, EasyBib.com is:
- More usable
- Easier to set up
- Easier to admin
Categories in common with EndNote: [Reference Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/reference-management)

**Compare:** [EndNote vs EasyBib.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/easybib-com-vs-endnote)
**Compare EasyBib.com with other alternatives:**
- [EasyBib.com vs Mendeley](https://www.g2.com/compare/easybib-com-vs-mendeley)
- [EasyBib.com vs ReadCube](https://www.g2.com/compare/easybib-com-vs-readcube)
- [EasyBib.com vs Zotero](https://www.g2.com/compare/easybib-com-vs-zotero)
- [EasyBib.com vs Sciwheel](https://www.g2.com/compare/easybib-com-vs-sciwheel)
- [EasyBib.com vs RefWorks](https://www.g2.com/compare/easybib-com-vs-refworks)
- [EasyBib.com vs Paperpile](https://www.g2.com/compare/easybib-com-vs-paperpile)
- [EasyBib.com vs Citavi](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-easybib-com)
- [EasyBib.com vs JabRef](https://www.g2.com/compare/easybib-com-vs-jabref)
- [EasyBib.com vs Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme-vs-easybib-com)

  ### 4. [Zotero](https://www.g2.com/products/zotero/reviews)
By Digital Scholar
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 99
Zotero is a free, open-source research tool designed to help users collect, organize, annotate, cite, and share research materials. It integrates seamlessly with web browsers, allowing for the automatic extraction and storage of bibliographic information from books, articles, and other resources encountered online. Zotero supports multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android, ensuring accessibility across various devices. Its user-friendly interface enables efficient management of research data, making it an invaluable asset for students, academics, and professionals. Key Features and Functionality: - Automatic Data Collection: Zotero detects research materials as users browse the web and can automatically save complete bibliographic references and associated files. - Organizational Tools: Users can sort items into collections, tag them with keywords, and create saved searches that dynamically update with relevant materials. - Citation and Bibliography Generation: Zotero integrates with word processors like Microsoft Word, LibreOffice, and Google Docs, enabling the creation of in-text citations, footnotes, and bibliographies in over 9,000 citation styles. - Annotation Capabilities: The built-in PDF reader allows for highlighting, note-taking, and freehand annotations, with support for Apple Pencil on compatible devices. - Synchronization Across Devices: Zotero can sync data across multiple devices, ensuring that files, notes, and bibliographic records are consistently up to date. - Collaborative Features: Users can create group libraries to co-write papers, distribute course materials, or build collaborative bibliographies, facilitating seamless teamwork. Primary Value and User Solutions: Zotero addresses the challenges of managing extensive research materials by providing a centralized platform for collecting, organizing, and citing sources. Its integration with web browsers and word processors streamlines the research workflow, reducing the time and effort required to compile and format bibliographies. The synchronization feature ensures that users have access to their research data across all devices, promoting flexibility and continuity. Additionally, Zotero's collaborative tools support teamwork among researchers, enhancing productivity and knowledge sharing. By offering these comprehensive features at no cost, Zotero democratizes access to powerful research management tools, benefiting a wide range of users from students to seasoned academics.


Reviewers say compared to EndNote, Zotero is:
- Easier to set up
- More usable
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with EndNote: [Reference Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/reference-management)

**Compare:** [EndNote vs Zotero](https://www.g2.com/compare/endnote-vs-zotero)
**Compare Zotero with other alternatives:**
- [Zotero vs Mendeley](https://www.g2.com/compare/mendeley-vs-zotero)
- [Zotero vs ReadCube](https://www.g2.com/compare/readcube-vs-zotero)
- [Zotero vs EasyBib.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/easybib-com-vs-zotero)
- [Zotero vs Sciwheel](https://www.g2.com/compare/sciwheel-vs-zotero)
- [Zotero vs RefWorks](https://www.g2.com/compare/refworks-vs-zotero)
- [Zotero vs Paperpile](https://www.g2.com/compare/paperpile-vs-zotero)
- [Zotero vs Citavi](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-zotero)
- [Zotero vs JabRef](https://www.g2.com/compare/jabref-vs-zotero)
- [Zotero vs Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme-vs-zotero)

  ### 5. [Sciwheel](https://www.g2.com/products/sciwheel/reviews)
By Sciwheel
**Average Rating:** 4.7/5
**Total Reviews:** 48
A software built to discover, read, annotate, write and share scientific research.


Reviewers say compared to EndNote, Sciwheel is:
- More usable
- Better at support
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with EndNote: [Reference Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/reference-management)

**Compare:** [EndNote vs Sciwheel](https://www.g2.com/compare/endnote-vs-sciwheel)
**Compare Sciwheel with other alternatives:**
- [Sciwheel vs Mendeley](https://www.g2.com/compare/mendeley-vs-sciwheel)
- [Sciwheel vs ReadCube](https://www.g2.com/compare/readcube-vs-sciwheel)
- [Sciwheel vs EasyBib.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/easybib-com-vs-sciwheel)
- [Sciwheel vs Zotero](https://www.g2.com/compare/sciwheel-vs-zotero)
- [Sciwheel vs RefWorks](https://www.g2.com/compare/refworks-vs-sciwheel)
- [Sciwheel vs Paperpile](https://www.g2.com/compare/paperpile-vs-sciwheel)
- [Sciwheel vs Citavi](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-sciwheel)
- [Sciwheel vs JabRef](https://www.g2.com/compare/jabref-vs-sciwheel)
- [Sciwheel vs Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme-vs-sciwheel)

  ### 6. [RefWorks](https://www.g2.com/products/refworks/reviews)
By ProQuest
**Average Rating:** 3.9/5
**Total Reviews:** 29
RefWorks is an online research management, writing and collaboration tool that is designed to help researchers easily gather, manage, store and share all types of information, as well as generate citations and bibliographies.


Reviewers say compared to EndNote, RefWorks is:
- More usable
- Better at support
Categories in common with EndNote: [Reference Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/reference-management)

**Compare:** [EndNote vs RefWorks](https://www.g2.com/compare/endnote-vs-refworks)
**Compare RefWorks with other alternatives:**
- [RefWorks vs Mendeley](https://www.g2.com/compare/mendeley-vs-refworks)
- [RefWorks vs ReadCube](https://www.g2.com/compare/readcube-vs-refworks)
- [RefWorks vs EasyBib.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/easybib-com-vs-refworks)
- [RefWorks vs Zotero](https://www.g2.com/compare/refworks-vs-zotero)
- [RefWorks vs Sciwheel](https://www.g2.com/compare/refworks-vs-sciwheel)
- [RefWorks vs Paperpile](https://www.g2.com/compare/paperpile-vs-refworks)
- [RefWorks vs Citavi](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-refworks)
- [RefWorks vs JabRef](https://www.g2.com/compare/jabref-vs-refworks)
- [RefWorks vs Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme-vs-refworks)

  ### 7. [Paperpile](https://www.g2.com/products/paperpile/reviews)
By Paperpile
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 26
No-fuss reference management for the web. Sync your PDFs to Google Drive and cite your papers in Google Docs.


Reviewers say compared to EndNote, Paperpile is:
- More usable
- Better at support
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with EndNote: [Reference Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/reference-management)

**Compare:** [EndNote vs Paperpile](https://www.g2.com/compare/endnote-vs-paperpile)
**Compare Paperpile with other alternatives:**
- [Paperpile vs Mendeley](https://www.g2.com/compare/mendeley-vs-paperpile)
- [Paperpile vs ReadCube](https://www.g2.com/compare/paperpile-vs-readcube)
- [Paperpile vs EasyBib.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/easybib-com-vs-paperpile)
- [Paperpile vs Zotero](https://www.g2.com/compare/paperpile-vs-zotero)
- [Paperpile vs Sciwheel](https://www.g2.com/compare/paperpile-vs-sciwheel)
- [Paperpile vs RefWorks](https://www.g2.com/compare/paperpile-vs-refworks)
- [Paperpile vs Citavi](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-paperpile)
- [Paperpile vs JabRef](https://www.g2.com/compare/jabref-vs-paperpile)
- [Paperpile vs Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme-vs-paperpile)

  ### 8. [Citavi](https://www.g2.com/products/citavi/reviews)
By Lumivero
**Average Rating:** 4.9/5
**Total Reviews:** 17
Citavi is a user-friendly reference management and knowledge organization program for researchers and students.


Reviewers say compared to EndNote, Citavi is:
- Better at support
- More usable
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with EndNote: [Reference Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/reference-management)

**Compare:** [EndNote vs Citavi](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-endnote)
**Compare Citavi with other alternatives:**
- [Citavi vs Mendeley](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-mendeley)
- [Citavi vs ReadCube](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-readcube)
- [Citavi vs EasyBib.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-easybib-com)
- [Citavi vs Zotero](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-zotero)
- [Citavi vs Sciwheel](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-sciwheel)
- [Citavi vs RefWorks](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-refworks)
- [Citavi vs Paperpile](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-paperpile)
- [Citavi vs JabRef](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-jabref)
- [Citavi vs Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme)

  ### 9. [JabRef](https://www.g2.com/products/jabref/reviews)
By JabRef
**Average Rating:** 4.7/5
**Total Reviews:** 12
JabRef is an open source bibliography reference manager. The native file format used by JabRef is BibTeX, the standard LaTeX bibliography format.


Reviewers say compared to EndNote, JabRef is:
- More usable
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with EndNote: [Reference Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/reference-management)

**Compare:** [EndNote vs JabRef](https://www.g2.com/compare/endnote-vs-jabref)
**Compare JabRef with other alternatives:**
- [JabRef vs Mendeley](https://www.g2.com/compare/jabref-vs-mendeley)
- [JabRef vs ReadCube](https://www.g2.com/compare/jabref-vs-readcube)
- [JabRef vs EasyBib.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/easybib-com-vs-jabref)
- [JabRef vs Zotero](https://www.g2.com/compare/jabref-vs-zotero)
- [JabRef vs Sciwheel](https://www.g2.com/compare/jabref-vs-sciwheel)
- [JabRef vs RefWorks](https://www.g2.com/compare/jabref-vs-refworks)
- [JabRef vs Paperpile](https://www.g2.com/compare/jabref-vs-paperpile)
- [JabRef vs Citavi](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-jabref)
- [JabRef vs Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme-vs-jabref)

  ### 10. [Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)](https://www.g2.com/products/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme/reviews)
By Chegg
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 22
CTFM helps researchers find and correctly cite sources.


Reviewers say compared to EndNote, Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) is:
- Better at meeting requirements
- More usable
Categories in common with EndNote: [Reference Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/reference-management)

**Compare:** [EndNote vs Cite This For Me (formerly RefME)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme-vs-endnote)
**Compare Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) with other alternatives:**
- [Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) vs Mendeley](https://www.g2.com/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme-vs-mendeley)
- [Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) vs ReadCube](https://www.g2.com/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme-vs-readcube)
- [Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) vs EasyBib.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme-vs-easybib-com)
- [Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) vs Zotero](https://www.g2.com/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme-vs-zotero)
- [Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) vs Sciwheel](https://www.g2.com/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme-vs-sciwheel)
- [Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) vs RefWorks](https://www.g2.com/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme-vs-refworks)
- [Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) vs Paperpile](https://www.g2.com/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme-vs-paperpile)
- [Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) vs Citavi](https://www.g2.com/compare/citavi-vs-cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme)
- [Cite This For Me (formerly RefME) vs JabRef](https://www.g2.com/compare/cite-this-for-me-formerly-refme-vs-jabref)


## Explore Articles
- [Which is the best performance management solution for a mid-sized IT firm](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-is-the-best-performance-management-solution-for-a-mid-sized-it-firm)
- [Best platforms for drag-and-drop email design](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-best-platforms-for-drag-and-drop-email-design)
- [Best tools for combining merchandising with personalization](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-best-tools-for-combining-merchandising-with-personalization)
- [What platform provides analytics on presentation engagement?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-platform-provides-analytics-on-presentation-engagement)
- [Most effective loyalty management tool for startups](https://www.g2.com/discussions/most-effective-loyalty-management-tool-for-startups)
- [What's the top experience management app available](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-top-experience-management-app-available)

## Spotlight Categories
- [Loyalty Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/loyalty-management)
- [Contract Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/contract-management)
- [VoIP Providers](https://www.g2.com/categories/voip)