# How do mobile crash reporting platforms compare on cost based on monthly active users for teams evaluating options before selecting a vendor?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I’m researching how teams model mobile crash reporting costs before choosing a vendor. The challenge is that platforms price around events, sessions, products, or usage—not always monthly active users alone.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"><strong>Key cost questions include:</strong></p><ul>
<li>What counts as an event or session?</li>
<li>How quickly can quotas grow?</li>
<li>Are related features billed separately?</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/sentry/reviews"><strong>Sentry</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Has a useful free tier, but reviewers say event limits can disappear quickly and tier jumps feel steep.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/google-firebase-crashlytics/reviews"><strong>Firebase Crashlytics</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Crash reporting itself is free, although broader Firebase services may add cost.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/rollbar/reviews"><strong>Rollbar</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Uses event-based pricing that reviewers often call reasonable and predictable.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/raygun/reviews"><strong>Raygun</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Prices crash reporting and real user monitoring separately.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/uxcam/reviews"><strong>UXCam</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Bundles crash data, replay, and analytics.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">How did you account for unexpected production volume in your first-year estimate?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Sentry&#39;s event quota disappearing faster than expected at production volume is the most common cost surprise in this category. Teams model MAUs but don&#39;t account for error spikes during releases. Rollbar&#39;s event-based pricing being called predictable suggests their quota behavior is more stable under that scenario.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4