--- title: DryRun Security Reviews meta_title: 'DryRun Security Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter 23 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how DryRun Security works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.9 review_count: 23 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-11-04' parent_category: name: "DevSecOps\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t" url: https://www.g2.com/categories/devsecops ---

DryRun Security Pros and Cons: Top 5 Advantages and Disadvantages

Quick AI Summary Based on G2 Reviews

Generated from real user reviews

Users appreciate the context-aware security feedback from DryRun Security, enabling efficient vulnerability mitigation in real-time. (13 mentions)
Users appreciate the quick and context-aware vulnerability detection of DryRun Security, enhancing code security during development. (9 mentions)
Users commend DryRun Security for its seamless integration and effective detections, enhancing code security and development efficiency. (8 mentions)
Users appreciate the accuracy of DryRun Security, effectively identifying vulnerabilities in AI-generated code and traditional applications. (7 mentions)
Users commend the easy setup of DryRun Security, providing seamless integration and efficient workflow for code scanning. (7 mentions)
Users experience slow performance in the management portal, affecting usability and efficiency with linked repositories. (2 mentions)
Users find the slow speed of the management portal frustrating, though improvements to the UI have been noted. (2 mentions)
Users note a need for improved UX investment in DryRun Security to enhance the developer experience and engagement. (2 mentions)
Users desire more customization options for tuning analyzers, indicating limited flexibility in current features. (1 mentions)
Users feel that greater focus on workflow issues could enhance DryRun Security's adoption among developers. (1 mentions)

5 Pros or Advantages of DryRun Security

5 Cons or Disadvantages of DryRun Security

DryRun Security Reviews (23)

Reviews

DryRun Security Reviews (23)

4.9
23 reviews
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
AC
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"DryRun Surfaces Actionable Security Issues with Helpful PR Context"
5/5
What do you like best about DryRun Security?

DryRun is better than any static code analyzer we’ve used. It consistently surfaces real security concerns in PRs, provides helpful context, and makes the findings actionable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about DryRun Security?

The scans can be a little slower compared to a static analyzer which is expected and acceptable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
UI
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Automated Repo Scans That Save Time and Boost Security"
5/5
What do you like best about DryRun Security?

Having automated scans directly in our repos saves so much time and helps make us secure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about DryRun Security?

Personally I have not run into any issues on DRS that I do not like! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User
A
Verified User
Head of Trust
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
5/5

DryRun effectively identifies bugs that traditional pattern-matching scanners miss, particularly through its DeepScans and PR reviews, which highlight critical issues like authorization logic flaws and SSRF vulnerabilities. The integration of PR comments into existing workflows ensures timely feedback for engineers, enhancing code security without hindering development speed.

View Full Review
Summarized using AI