DryRun was very easy to use, and was immediately helpful. I ran a deep scan and used the finding details to fix each vulnerability very quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It would be cool if the PR scans could update the risk register as vulnerabilities got patched. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Very easy to set up and has takes in Github permissions making me worry less about what people have permission on. This SAST tool is a cutting edge and utilizes AI in a proper way allowing us to plug and play the tool into repo and get findings on it consistently across the repos we worry about. Chatting with the sec team + dev team we can see it provides value that other SAST tools haven't provided but also isn't noisy and high accurate letting find very critical bugs that have been missed in the past. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing really. Had minor issues with missing common SAST features (dismissal, long PR comments) but Dry Run's team really steps up their game and take in customer feedback to consistently improve and make the product suit the customer as much as possible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use traditional SAST tools, but they mostly depend on rule-based static analysis. DryRun Security, by contrast, focuses on understanding code intent and logical flow, which makes it effective at finding authorization flaws, broken object-level authorization, insecure direct object reference, and insecure business logic. As AI assistants such as Cursor or ChatGPT-based tools become more widely adopted, we face new risks from AI-authored code. DryRun Security helps us focus specifically on the logic flaws that can show up in AI-generated code snippets—issues that traditional scanners often miss. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This isn’t necessarily about the DryRun functionality itself, but it would be ideal to have DryRun Security available as a Marketplace offering in the cloud provider we use. That would make integration, renewal, and onboarding smoother and easier overall. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

DryRun Security gives me high-signal visibility into the changes that actually matter. The out-of-the-box analyzers help me quickly spot unexpected or risky behavior in pull requests without having to manually comb through everything. It’s become a practical way to scale AppSec review when PR volume is high—especially for catching edge cases that could create real operational or compliance impact.

I also appreciate how quickly the team is iterating: they’re regularly adding meaningful functionality, improving false-positive handling, and behaving like thought leaders in the AppSec space rather than “just another scanner.” Their continued momentum toward/through GRC certifications is a strong indicator they’re building for serious organizations, not hobby deployments.

Getting it installed was SO simple. We didn't need to tweak much, but once we started it got even better!

If the citizens of Troy had used DryRun Security, the Greeks never would have made it in. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don’t have many dislikes. If I had to pick one, it would be that I’d love to see even more investment in the developer experience and day-to-day workflow fit—making it a tool developers want to use, not one that security has to continually champion. It’s already valuable, but increasing developer pull (UX, messaging in PRs, “why it matters” context, smoother adoption) would make it even stickier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The new Deep Scan feature, which performs a comprehensive review of our application, was incredibly helpful for identifying issues in a legacy application with millions of lines of code. Over the 20+ years of this application's lifespan, we've had several audits and 3rd-party reviews. DryRun's AI had a better grasp of the code's business intent and overall structure than most previous auditors. I expected a firehose of findings, most of which would be false positives or non-issues. However, the report listed 20 or so items to check, only one of which was a complete false positive. We're still tuning the engine for our uses, but the PR reviews have been helpful and insightful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Their UI can be a bit sluggish, especially when there are many linked GitLab repositories. It's pretty clear they've been spending most of their time on the scanning engines, and the UI was a lower priority. However, that seems to be clearing up, as the UI has improved. Ideally, you shouldn't need to use it much once it's up and running; you can just let it work directly with your repo. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

DryRun's use of LLMs and inclusion of context about the application makes it perform far better than traditional SAST tools. It is able to find "business logic" vulnerabilities that the legacy SAST scanners are simply unable to find and it better characterizes all of its results based on the application context it ingests. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Up until recently, you could only do pull request-level scans. Recently they added the ability to do full-repository scans so I'm excited to see how this capability evolves. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use it every day. We review anywhere from 5-50 PRs. Higher on a good day. We use any of the code review agents, but DryRun is the one we specifically rely on to review the security of the code Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Until recently, we could only use it on a PR by PR basis. They've added a repo review (or rather an entire codebase review), but I haven't had a chance to test it yet. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

DryRun Security helps solve the problem of noisy and time-consuming security reviews by providing contextual, high-signal findings directly in the developer workflow. Instead of spending unnecessary time sorting through false positives or trying to determine which issues are actually exploitable, the platform uses AI-driven analysis to help identify the risks that actually matter and explain them in a way developers can act on. Its performance has also been a benefit, as it fits well into the pull request process without creating unnecessary friction or slowing down development.

It also helps bridge the gap between security and development teams. By providing AI-powered remediation guidance, pull request context, and policy-based guardrails, DryRun Security makes it easier to maintain security standards while still allowing teams to move quickly. The support experience has been another positive, with helpful guidance when questions come up or when we need assistance getting more value from the platform. Overall, DryRun Security supports faster, more confident development while giving security teams better visibility into code risk across repositories. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main thing I would like to see improved is broader integration with external workflow and ticket management platforms, especially Jira. While DryRun Security provides useful findings and guidance in the developer workflow, having a more seamless way to create, track, and manage security tickets in Jira would make it easier for teams that rely heavily on Jira for vulnerability management, sprint planning, and remediation tracking. Stronger integrations with external platforms would help security and engineering teams operationalize findings more effectively across their existing processes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The team at DryRun Security has been wonderful to work with, and the technology is seamless to integrate. It provides valuable and ever-improving detections and allows us to accelerate secure code development, especially in the era of AI accelerating code creation. They are really innovating with agentic detections in software, not just static pattern matching like traditional SAST vendors, and can do multidimensional analysis across a wide range of contexts. This helps catch problems that would be otherwise impossible to detect with existing technology and makes our code even more secure against complex and emerging threats like prompt injection or IDOR. Additionally, integration with Impart Security's runtime protection platform is seamless, providing an end to end AI native solution. The initial setup of DryRun Security was very easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would love to see DryRun Security scan more of the codebase, not just pull requests. I believe they have recently launched a new feature called deepscan, and I would like the DryRun approach to be used in evaluating the entire repo so that I can get a sense of not just new code but also existing code security. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use DryRun Security to identify issues for security review or improvement as our engineering team commits a lot of code. It helps me be aware of risky changes to the codebase and assists with code security reviews. My favorite thing about DryRun is that it allows me to focus on other tasks rather than reviewing code changes and PRs all the time. I appreciate that their team is fairly quick to make feature request changes and listens to customer feedback. The initial setup was very easy and smooth, and there's really nothing like it at the moment — it's great. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I do somewhat wish there were more customization options for tuning the analyzers, but that seems to be in the works. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.