# Which SaaS backup solutions have the fastest recovery times based on verified user reviews?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I’m comparing which <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/saas-backup">SaaS backup solutions</a> users associate most often with fast recovery, because backup speed matters a lot less if restoring the data becomes the bottleneck.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Looking through reviews for products in the <strong>G2 Grid report for SaaS Backup</strong>, a few recovery-speed patterns came through clearly:</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"><strong>For consistently fast restores</strong></p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/crashplan-platform/reviews"><strong>CrashPlan Platform</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Multiple reviewers describe restores as quick, including point-in-time recovery and Microsoft 365 data recovery.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/acronis-cyber-protect-cloud/reviews"><strong>Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Users repeatedly mention fast or smooth recovery alongside integrated backup and cybersecurity.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"><strong>For granular SaaS recovery</strong></p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/keepit/reviews"><strong>Keepit</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Reviewers call out quick, granular restores for Microsoft 365 and Salesforce data.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/salesforce-backup-recover/reviews"><strong>Salesforce Backup &amp; Recover</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Users value targeted restores that avoid recovering an entire Salesforce environment.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"><strong>For simple operational recovery</strong></p><ul><li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/cove-data-protection/reviews"><strong>Cove Data Protection</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Reviewers describe recovery as responsive and easy for deleted Microsoft 365 files and emails.</li></ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What I’d like to understand from teams using these in real incidents: which one actually restored data fastest when downtime mattered? Was raw recovery speed the deciding factor, or did search, granularity, and ease of selecting the right restore point matter more?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 6 days ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;I’d separate restore speed from time-to-recovery here. A fast restore doesn’t help much if someone spends an hour finding the right version or figuring out exactly what needs restoring. For a real incident, I’d care about the full clock from “we need this back” to usable data being available again. Has anyone compared these tools that way rather than just looking at restore throughput?&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 5 days ago
- Author title: Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4


