# Which ethics and compliance learning platforms are most trusted by training managers, based on user reviews?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">A question for G2 researchers and LMS reviewers who live in user review data: which<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/ethics-and-compliance-learning"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/ethics-and-compliance-learning">ethics and compliance learning</a> platforms do training managers rate highest and keep recommending? </p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">By the G2 reviews I found and evaluated, four tools keep rising to the top:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/absorb-software-absorb-lms/reviews"><strong>Absorb LMS</strong></a>: The most trusted E&amp;C software at scale. It has the highest G2 Satisfaction score in the category and the deepest review base among the top-rated (4.6 from 880+ reviews). Seems like a strong score that a number of reviews have actually stress-tested. I wonder what training managers say about it. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/easyllama/reviews"><strong>EasyLlama</strong></a>: It also has a near-perfect G2 satisfaction score and 4.8 rating across 390+ reviews, with ~97% saying they’d recommend it. Trust runs high, but how does it actually support training instructors?</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/mitratech-mineral/reviews"><strong>Mitratech Mineral</strong></a>: It appears to be SMB favorite and has 4.8 rating, standout quality-of-support scores, and the clear leader on the small-business grid. From the numbers, it’s the one lean teams keep vouching for. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/continu/reviews"><strong>Continu</strong></a>: It also has high marks at real volume on G2: 4.6 rating across 710+ reviews. This is also a trustable tool backed by a large review base here.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Adoption and review-trust aren't the same. And that’s the read I’d like from software researchers and reviewers here. Looking to understand whose platform a training manager would still defend a year in, and which would you actually trust to run a training program.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 4 months ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;NAVEX One has real scale behind it, trusted by a large share of the Fortune 100 for training tied to policy and case management. Traliant is the other trusted name, particularly liked for content that&#39;s actively kept current by an in-house legal team rather than going stale.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;NAVEX One has real scale behind it, trusted by a large share of the Fortune 100 for training tied to policy and case management. Traliant is the other trusted name, particularly liked for content that&#39;s actively kept current by an in-house legal team rather than going stale.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;I’d add administrator effort to that trust test. A platform can be reliable for learners but still become difficult for the training team if every policy change means manually rebuilding assignments, chasing overdue users, or cleaning up reporting. The stronger long-term signal is whether a small training team can keep the program accurate as courses, regulations, and employee populations change.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago
- Author title: Writer



### Comment 4

&lt;p&gt;I’d look beyond the headline rating and ask what training managers consistently praise after the platform has been running for a year. Trust usually shows up in four places: reliable automation, accurate reporting, responsive support, and whether the system stays manageable as the program grows.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 months ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4