# Which connected worker platforms have the best ROI evidence for reducing equipment downtime and improving overall equipment effectiveness for manufacturers?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I spend a lot of my <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/connected-worker-platform">connected worker platform</a> research on the downtime-and-OEE question, since that is where manufacturers most want proof a tool pays off. Here are four where reviewers, and in some cases the vendors' own customer-reported numbers, speak to that. Ratings are included, and where a figure is vendor-reported I have flagged it as such rather than treating it as independent.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/l2l/reviews"><strong>L2L</strong></a> (4.3 stars, 216 reviews) is built around eliminating downtime, and reviewers describe it surfacing issues in one plant area before they reach the next, with root-cause analysis and instant dispatch; the vendor reports customers saving billions annually in downtime costs, which is a claim rather than an independent result.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/qad-redzone/reviews"><strong>Redzone</strong></a> (4.8 stars, 578 reviews) gives real-time OEE monitoring and dashboards that reviewers say replaced paper and gave them instant visibility; Redzone reports customer averages of a 26% productivity gain in 90 days and a 24% cut in unplanned downtime.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/maintainx/reviews"><strong>MaintainX</strong></a> (4.8 stars, 1,538 reviews) draws praise for standardizing preventive maintenance and cutting reactive work; MaintainX reports customer averages of 32% less unplanned downtime and 38% more equipment uptime, which are vendor figures worth verifying for your own case.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/factbird/reviews"><strong>Factbird</strong></a> (4.6 stars, 63 reviews) captures line data through sensors and cameras with built-in OEE, and reviewers report increased equipment availability and reduced unplanned downtime, with one noting it installed in minutes and needed little IT.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For the manufacturers here: whose ROID claims actually held up once you were live, and did you measure downtime and OEE before and after, or go on feel? Curious which of these gave you a number you could take to leadership.</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;The distinction you draw between an independent result and a vendor-reported claim is the one that actually matters here. A downtime number only means something if you captured a baseline before go-live; it&#39;s a feeling dressed up as a metric. The teams that can take a figure to leadership are almost always the ones that measured OEE before and after, not just after.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 22 days ago
- Author title: Marketing





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4