# Which business process management tools handle cross-departmental workflows well and keep data flowing between teams without manual handoffs?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I’m researching which business process management tools handle cross-departmental workflows well and keep data flowing between teams without manual handoffs. The pain point I keep coming back to is what happens when a process moves from procurement to finance to legal and the data has to follow.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For teams comparing<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/business-process-management"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/business-process-management">business process management tools</a>, I’d group the options by workflow need:</p><ul>
<li>
<strong>Microsoft-heavy teams:</strong><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-power-automate/reviews"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-power-automate/reviews"><strong>Microsoft Power Automate</strong></a> connects Microsoft 365 tools and external systems so updates move automatically.</li>
<li>
<strong>Document-heavy processes:</strong><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/laserfiche/reviews"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/laserfiche/reviews"><strong>Laserfiche</strong></a> centralizes intake, routes forms, and pushes information into ERP workflows.</li>
<li>
<strong>Multi-system visibility:</strong><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/appian/reviews"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/appian/reviews"><strong>Appian</strong></a> uses data fabric to bring information together without a large migration.</li>
<li>
<strong>Routing and accountability:</strong><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/nintex-nintex/reviews"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/nintex-nintex/reviews"><strong>Nintex</strong></a> helps teams see where requests sit across departments.</li>
<li>
<strong>Complex orchestration:</strong><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/camunda/reviews"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/camunda/reviews"><strong>Camunda</strong></a> coordinates people, systems, APIs, and bottleneck tracking.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I’d be interested in what breaks first when workflows cross three or more teams.</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 28 days ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Manual handoffs usually survive not because the tool can&#39;t automate them, but because each department owns its own little system and nobody wants to give up control. The tech is the easy part, the org design is the hard part. Before tooling, map where a process actually stops and waits for someone to re-key something, that&#39;s your handoff tax. Are the gaps because systems don&#39;t talk, or because teams don&#39;t trust each other&#39;s data? Only one of those is a software problem.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 18 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4