# Which autonomous endpoint management platforms eliminate the need for manual patch cycles so IT teams are not spending hours pushing updates across devices?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hey everyone! A quick reality check.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">If <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/autonomous-endpoint-management-aem">autonomous endpoint management</a> is supposed to eliminate manual patch cycles, why are so many teams still spending hours pushing updates across devices?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I’ve been pulling together examples for a broader write-up, and it feels like “automation” means very different things across tools.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Here’s what I’ve seen so far:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/action1/reviews"><strong>Action1</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Handles patching without needing devices on VPN, which changes how remote fleets are managed.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/automox/reviews"><strong>Automox</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Uses policies tied to vulnerabilities, so patching happens based on risk rather than schedules.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ninjaone/reviews"><strong>NinjaOne</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Patching sits inside a broader endpoint workflow, which reduces context switching.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/splashtop-autonomous-endpoint-management/reviews"><strong>Splashtop Autonomous Endpoint Management</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Focuses on structured automation through scheduling and centralized execution.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/tanium/reviews"><strong>Tanium</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Built for environments where patching needs to move fast across a large number of endpoints.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What I’m trying to understand is this: At what point does patching actually become “hands-off” instead of just “less painful”?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 3 months ago
- Author title: Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;The metric worth tracking isn&#39;t patch compliance percentage, it&#39;s how many devices needed a human touch this cycle. Compliance can read fine while three people spent Thursday getting it there.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 8 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;ManageEngine Endpoint Central automates patch deployment across OS and third-party apps so IT isn&#39;t manually pushing updates device by device. Pulseway does something similar in the background. Autonomous doesn&#39;t mean zero human involvement though, exceptions and failed patches still need a person.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 8 days ago



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;The honest answer to your last question is that patching goes hands-off when the tool owns the exceptions, not the pushes. Pushing to the fleet has been solved for years. The hours go into the fifty machines that were asleep, the ones waiting on a reboot the user keeps deferring, and the handful with an app that only breaks on one specific version. Action1 handling patching without devices being on VPN is relevant for exactly that reason, since a big share of the exception queue in a remote fleet is just &quot;the device wasn&#39;t reachable when the window opened.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 8 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant



### Comment 4

&lt;p&gt;I keep going back and forth on this one, at what point does patching become genuinely hands-off vs just slightly less manual than it was before?&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 months ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4