# Which Acumatica Channel Partners offer dedicated implementation managers who understand your business goals?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I'm researching which Acumatica Channel Partners actually assign a dedicated implementation manager who takes the time to understand a company's specific business goals, rather than running a generic implementation playbook. Inside <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/acumatica-channel-partners">Acumatica Channel Partners</a>, <strong>Blytheco</strong>, <strong>The Answer Company</strong>, and <strong>Net at Work</strong> stand out for this kind of dedicated support.</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/blytheco/reviews"><strong>Blytheco</strong></a>: reviewers consistently mention responsive, dedicated project contacts who stay engaged with the business context throughout implementation.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/the-answer-company/reviews"><strong>The Answer Company</strong></a>: known for assigning implementation staff who get into the specifics of a client's workflows rather than a one-size-fits-all rollout.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/net-at-work/reviews"><strong>Net at Work</strong></a>: offers dedicated project management as part of its broader implementation services, useful for companies wanting a consistent point of contact.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/nextec-group/reviews"><strong>NexTec Group</strong></a>: provides implementation managers who work closely with client teams on configuration decisions tied to actual business goals.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/crestwood-associates/reviews"><strong>Crestwood Associates</strong></a>: a smaller partner where clients often get more direct access to senior implementation staff.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For companies that had a genuinely engaged implementation manager, what did that actually look like in practice, more frequent check-ins, deeper discovery upfront, or something else entirely?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 18 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Deeper discovery upfront would matter most to me. A dedicated implementation manager adds real value when they understand why existing workflows work the way they do, which processes should change, and what outcomes the business expects from Acumatica. Frequent check-ins help, but I’d judge the relationship by whether configuration decisions consistently trace back to those original business goals.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 16 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4