# What is the highest rated Vendor Management software for teams automating compliance tracking and vendor risk assessment workflows?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">We're researching what the highest rated <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/vendor-management">Vendor Management</a> software is for teams automating compliance tracking and vendor risk assessment workflows, specifically, since general vendor management and compliance-focused vendor management pull in genuinely different directions.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The three most built for this are Vanta, Stampli, and SAP Fieldglass. Here's the fuller list:</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/vanta/reviews"><strong>Vanta</strong></a><strong>:</strong> 4.6 stars across 2,721 reviews, its Agentic Trust Platform automates 35+ compliance frameworks, including SOC 2 and ISO 27001, alongside broader GRC and risk workflows.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/stampli/reviews"><strong>Stampli</strong></a><strong>:</strong> 4.6 stars across 2,006 reviews. Stampli AI handles an average of 87% of finance work across procurement and vendor management, with human review before anything is posted.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/sap-sap-fieldglass/reviews"><strong>SAP Fieldglass</strong></a><strong>:</strong> 4.5 stars across 484 reviews, built specifically around global-regulations compliance and permissions tracking for managing an external workforce at scale.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/quickbooks-online/reviews"><strong>QuickBooks Online</strong></a><strong>:</strong> 4.0 stars across 3,880 reviews, the largest review base here, though its vendor management sits inside broader small-business accounting rather than dedicated risk assessment tooling.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/paylocity/reviews"><strong>Paylocity</strong></a><strong>:</strong> 4.4 stars across 6,248 reviews, positioned more broadly around HCM with vendor-adjacent spend and procurement visibility as one piece of a larger platform.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For compliance teams that automated this recently, did the automated risk scoring actually match what a manual review would have caught, or did it need a human pass anyway?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago
- Author title: Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Vendor Management reviews on G2 turn out to be a mix of two different jobs wearing the same category label. QuickBooks Online and Paylocity are a stretch here, since vendor risk assessment isn&#39;t really what either tool is built around; it just sits inside a broader accounting or HCM platform rather than being a dedicated capability. Vanta is the closer fit on paper, but even within its own Vendor Management reviews, most of what people describe is automating their own SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence collection rather than assessing other vendors, with only a thinner slice actually describing the vendor-facing side, such as a shareable trust report or scans that flag unapproved third-party apps.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;That split partly answers the closing question: Automated scoring seems to catch what it&#39;s configured to catch, but reviewers are consistent that manual review still matters, and that caution likely applies even more to the vendor-assessment slice, given how much smaller it is. For genuinely vendor-risk-focused work, it may be worth checking whether a platform built specifically around third-party risk fits the angle better than one where vendor risk is one feature among several.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 21 hours ago
- Author title: Marketing





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4