Fauna
Fauna is a truly serverless operational database that empowers teams to ship applications faster. It combines the flexibility of a document model with the strong consistency and rich querying power of relational systems—all built on a serverless, distributed architecture that scales automatically, without the complexity of manual provisioning, sharding, or replication. Over 80,000 development teams choose Fauna to build and scale modern transactional applications including teams from Tyson Foods, Unilever, Lexmark, Intelliculture, Hannon Hill, Cloaked, DTLR, and Insights.gg.
Average Rating: 4.4/5.0
Total Reviews: 25
How Do G2 Users Rate Fauna?
- Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 9.0/10 (Category avg: 9.1/10)
- Ease of Admin: 8.6/10 (Category avg: 8.4/10)
- Quality of Support: 8.9/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)
Who Is the Company Behind Fauna?
- Seller: Fauna
- Year Founded: 2015
- HQ Location: San Francisco, CA
-
Twitter: @fauna
93,015 Twitter followers -
LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
12 employees on LinkedIn®
Who Uses This Product?
- Top Industries: Information Technology and Services
- Company Size: 64% Small, 24% Medium
What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Fauna?
AI-generated summary from verified user reviews
Pros
- Users highlight Fauna's high scalability, enabling effortless handling of growing applications in a serverless environment.
- Users find Fauna's interface to be incredibly easy to use, simplifying database management and accelerating development.
- Users value the flexibility of Fauna, enabling easy prototyping and efficient handling of diverse data requirements.
- Users praise the exceptional customer support from Fauna, highlighting their responsiveness and helpfulness during setup and troubleshooting.
- Users value the easy integrations of Fauna, enabling quick setup and seamless adaptation to their development needs.
Cons
- Users find the difficult learning curve and debugging challenges of Fauna to be significant obstacles to usability.
- Users struggle with poor documentation for on-premise setups, making it difficult to find necessary deployment patterns.
- Users find the type system difficult to debug, and the absence of full text search limits usability.
- Users find the complex setup of Fauna challenging, especially for on-premise architecture integration.
- Users are concerned about cost issues with Fauna, as pricing can escalate with usage beyond the free tier.
What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Fauna?
"The "best of every world" Database"
Rating: 5.0/5.0 stars
— Tayler K.
Rating: 5.0/5.0 stars
— Verified User in Government Administration

