The ability for candidates to conduct an interview on their time. The ability to configure the platform for the best use of the client. The timeliness of getting updates from Willo on candidate submissions and overall, the quality of the platform.
I like the convenience of Willo Video Interviewing. The transcripting tool is the most accurate one I've seen, which is really beneficial for me, especially since I sometimes struggle with auditory processing. Also, it's very easy to use. The setup was super easy and didn't involve much, which I found very convenient.
Willo works really well for us mainly as a candidate screening tool. It’s super easy for applicants to use since they just click a link and record their answers, which helps keep completion rates high and removes a lot of scheduling back-and-forth. On our side, the interface is clean and simple, so reviewing responses is quick and straightforward, especially for early-stage screening. It integrates with some ATS tools, which is helpful, though not super extensive if you’re running a more complex system. Performance-wise, it does exactly what we need for screening, but reviewing videos can still take time as volume grows. Pricing feels reasonable for the value it brings, especially in saving recruiter time during the initial stages. Onboarding was quick, and support has been solid whenever needed. The AI features like transcripts and summaries are nice to have, but overall we still rely on human judgment to make screening decisions.
Willo’s accessible candidate screening software helps hiring teams assess people at scale, review structured responses, and build evidence-based shortlists with human intelligence.