telli Pricing Overview

Edit edit
Free Trial

telli Pricing Key Insights

Last updated on Jul 29, 2026

telli offers a free trial. Information about telli pricing, plan availability, and costs is not listed on G2 by the vendor. Buyers typically need to engage directly with the vendor to understand pricing options. Final cost negotiations to purchase telli must be conducted with the seller.

Rated 4.8 / 5

*Pricing information is supplied by the software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations must be conducted with the seller.

Pricing Insights

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

1 month

Return on Investment

4 months

telli Pricing FAQs

Generated using AI

Is telli free, or does it offer a free trial?

telli does not offer a permanent free plan, but it does provide a free trial that lets users to test the product before committing to a paid plan. Trial availability and duration may vary, so users should review the seller's official pricing page for the most current details.

Who is telli pricing best suited for?

Based on G2 reviewer demographics and telli's custom-quote pricing model, telli's pricing is best suited for mid-market and enterprise teams with high outbound or inbound call volumes that justify replacing or augmenting human agents. G2 reviewers span healthcare, legal services, financial services, real estate, energy, and media production — industries with structured, repeatable call workflows like lead qualification, appointment booking, intake handling, and claims follow-up. Small businesses with lean teams also appear frequently in G2 reviews of telli, particularly where scaling headcount is not feasible. Teams needing multilingual support, CRM integration, and fast deployment will find telli's pricing model most aligned to their operational needs.

What are the key differences between the free and paid versions of telli?

No free tier or publicly listed pricing tiers appear in G2's pricing data for telli. telli's pricing is structured around custom enterprise quotes, with no self-serve free plan available. G2 reviewers note that one early friction point was billing complexity, though telli was actively building a dedicated billing section at time of review. For teams evaluating telli, onboarding has been rapid — multiple G2 reviewers report going live within one to two weeks — suggesting telli's paid plans are designed for fast time-to-value rather than a freemium evaluation path. Prospective buyers should contact telli directly for custom pricing aligned to call volume and use case.

Is telli considered good value for its pricing?

G2 reviewers rate telli at 4.8+ average across 20+ reviews, signaling strong perceived value. A small business reviewer in renewables explicitly cites fair pricing and scalability as pros. One mid-market renewables reviewer flags pricing as a primary concern, but that remains an isolated signal against overwhelmingly positive sentiment. G2 reviews of telli consistently highlight fast onboarding, natural voice quality, and capacity-multiplying outcomes — handling thousands of calls, booking appointments at call-center parity, and enabling 24/7 multilingual inbound — as justifications for cost. The custom-quote model means value scales with use case, making telli's pricing most defensible for teams replacing or augmenting human agent capacity at volume.

Top-Rated Alternatives

JustCall
JustCall
4.3/5(2,396)
Genesys Cloud CX
Genesys Cloud CX
4.4/5(1,584)
Dialpad Support
Dialpad Support
4.4/5(726)

telli Pricing Reviews

(2)
Andreas E.
AE
Andreas E.
Managing Director Technology
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"One of the best real value generating SaaS GenAI products out there"
5/5
What do you like best about telli?

The software is already mature and includes the relevant classic software‑service elements that are necessary. You can immediately tell that the team behind it takes very few shortcuts at most. On top of that, the voice bot naturally does what it’s supposed to do. In particular, the speed and interaction capabilities are definitely on par with Nvidia’s PersonaPlex, while the possible complexity and stability are significantly better. In addition, there’s a very professional team that apparently knows what matters. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about telli?

The versioning and potential organization within the prompt/context and sub-prompts Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Insurance
AI
Verified User in Insurance
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Covers outbound work we were never getting to"
4.5/5
What do you like best about telli?

What works best for us is the combination of multilingual voice agents and workflows. We run two outbound use cases in German, French and English, and setting up a new agent per language is fast. The custom tools are the real upside: the agent can trigger an action mid-call, like sending a payment link or handing over to a human colleague, and we wire that into our own automation stack.

Charlie, the built-in AI assistant, is genuinely useful. It builds and changes agent configuration and workflows for you, and it is good at checking its own work. When we asked it to change something that conflicted with a rule we had set, it stopped and asked instead of working around it. That matters when you are editing live agents.

The Salesforce integration lets us log every call back into our CRM, so the voice agent appears in the same reports as our human calls. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about telli?

The biggest gap for us is visibility when something breaks. If a custom tool call fails, the agent gets the error back but nobody on our side is notified. We had a case where tool calls had been failing for a month and we only found it because we went looking. Tool errors are stored on the call record, but there is no API to pull them and no account-level alerting, so you have to build your own monitoring around it.

Outcome fields are always filled in by a model after the call, never set directly from a tool result. That is fine for conversation outcomes, but it means “a tool failed” is an inference rather than a fact.

Workflows are tied to a single agent, so with six agents we maintain six identical copies of the same logic. A change has to be made six times.

Smaller things: the recording URL is only available in generic HTTP steps, so we cannot write it into our CRM, and there is no attempt counter available in workflows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Categories on G2
Explore More