TeamCity is a highly flexible platform that allows for a deep level of customization, without being difficult for first-time use. The pricing is a bargain considering how essential it is for our team. Customer support has always been very prompt and helpful, and any questions or requests we've had have been answered quickly. It's quick and intuitive to set up a new pipeline, with lots of integrations included out of the box. At the same time, it provides tools for highly customized workflows and automation. Performance is always snappy, and so far, downtime has been nonexistent. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Highly customized workflows can be difficult to set up, such as recipes, which can only be created and edited in-browser as raw XML. Cleanup rules are also difficult to understand and create. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In general TeamCity is the best choice for our self hosted CI/CD pipelines.

UI/UX is very reasonable and functional for many use cases, like developers trying to run and monitor builds, QA trying to access build links etc. Admin functionality is good for most use cases which require new user setup, adjust permissions, configure server properties etc.

Most used integrations on our side are - ability to offload artifacts to AWS S3, cloud profiles for agents, integrations with artifacts servers docker, npm etc.

Performance is pretty good for amount of configurations we have (hundreds).

Pricing is on higher side but manageable by company of our size.

Also it is relatively easy to find information about Teamcity on internet or through AI in case if you stuck with some particular problem.

I don't have comprehensive opinion about AI tools integrated into Teamcity we just trying to learn what it is about. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think biggest issue we struggle with right now is ability to scale. With so many configurations and so many builds, UI becomes quite limiting for editing complex multi-step configurations. I see a lot of duplicated configurations, many team members still not grasped meta-runner concept. To put it simply we need unified development environment/UI with ability to quickly refer/edit meta-runners and deal with configuration/steps. Today we have a lot of configurations with awful amount of duplication or some legacy ways of how they do things and there is no clear way for us to refactor this.

Also management of Cloud profile Agents pose own challenges. Since most agents start as AWS AMIs, ability to keep them updated is a challenge now. With each TC server update agent software has to be updated as well, otherwise each time Agents start they will be updating agent software which increases time of startup dramatically. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It has basic features that meet a non-zero percentage of our testing needs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

So many basic problems, it would take weeks to write them all out. Obvious examples:

1. No click zone on tiny buttons, so a click that falls within 1 pixel of a '...' button will hit the backing panel, causing chaos in the UI.

2. Triggering a build over the REST API requires setting the branch name twice, even though it would never make sense to set the branch name differently in one place than the other. What's worse, if you forget to set one of the branch name attributes, TeamCity proceeds with the build but marks it as a "default branch build", even if the other branch attribute clearly indicated a non-default branch.

3. Build agents are constantly going offline, or going into some mysterious frozen state, requiring manual restart (or worse). Is it really a problem for a cloud agent pool to sit idle for a few hours while remaining available to start agents on demand?

It appears there is no testing performed internally at TeamCity, and only the most severe issues reported by users are ever resolved. As a supposed contributor to progress in technological capability, JetBrains is a shocking failure, instead making a case for the regression of civilization wherever it is burdened with such pathological lack of work ethic. Sporting one of the most arrogant company names in modern history, employees in fact make no effort to "work smarter, not harder"; not even the most basic principles and techniques of computer science are applied in the TeamCity platform. Humanity is clouded by disappointment where companies like JetBrains disregard the work experience of anyone who relies on their products. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While other tools often require a massive collection of third-party plugins just to perform basic tasks, TeamCity provides a polished, high-performance experience right out of the box Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The pricing model is often cited as its biggest drawback. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

TeamCity have ability to integrate with verity of tools and streamline CD/DVD processes.IT is ease of use and flexibility to work.

Visual studio is enabling developers to start programming quickly.

Easy to read failure notices. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Frizzing automatically, Manual restart is required to get start.

High Pricing model is biggest drawback.

only getting service resolved by support team, when raise incident for them. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It supports .net framework and is an exceptionally reliable tool for freshers entering devops, you can run it on any operating system. Integrates with build/test tools seamlessly and keeps a record of history. Multiple Integrations with 3rd Party Applications like : JIRA - To track and report issues Visual studio - In enabling developers to start programming quickly. Docker- To automatically create containers Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

API integration documentation Cost is high Resource usage is also high User interface can be improved Learning curve can be complex especially when you don't have support within your team. Customer support Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. It gives us an opportunity for continuous integration of UNIT CASES

2. It gives us an opportunity for continuous DEVELOPMENT of UNIT CASES

3. It gives us an opportunity TO RUN OUR SYSTEM INTEGRATION TEST in pipeline using automation

4. It gives us an opportunity to run on a scheduler

5. It gives us an opportunity to get integrate with GITLAB or application like postman/ Intellij/ Eclipse

6. Easy implementation, not much complex

7. I am using it daily in my career as I am SDET Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't think we have any as such drawback as it fulfills the purpose Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- Ability to automate everything possible using their scripting and different plugins

- Easy to install and configure

- It also supports a wide range of build tools and version control systems

- Provides extensive reporting and analytics

- Excellent support and active community

- Support with docker and Kubernetes

- Different level of user access management which ensures the good level of security Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- It is not easy to start with for beginners. The learning curve is steep

- Pricing can be relatively high for larger teams or organizations

- Can be resource-intensive, requiring dedicated hardware or powerful servers

- Bit of outdated UI

- Sometimes build server takes too much time to load Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- Integrated with majority of the unit test frameworks

- Supports multi-step build/deployment process

- It helps in detecting code build/test related issues early in SDLC

- TeamCity helps in faster delivery of the software products through automated build, deploy and test cycles Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- It's a licensed product (paid)

- Many times the application build fails without any particular reason which becomes challenging to debug

- Random build failures and build timeouts Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy integration with various tools and services, fast response rate, detailed logs availability to troubleshoot any issues, and meticulous build results with automated email and notifications are convenient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Lack of enough documentation hinders initial setup; lots of features are in the experimental stage, very few plugins compared to other peers, and compulsory upgrades, which sometimes impact the ongoing work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.