The fact that its one stop shop for Test creation, execution and defect management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A defect created, cannot be attached with more than one script. Due to this user do not get insight that what impact defect has on scripts. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The system can be configured for our varying needs. It doesn't force a process, it allows us to support whatever process we need. Different projects can use different workflows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The user interface is not as nice as other tools. Makes adoption a little bit more difficult. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

test coverage feature is the most used by me an my twam . its a nice featute.. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

the ui of the dashboard could have been better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is good at linking test cases and requirements. Reporting can be useful if done correctly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Cross project collaboration is not possible. I cannot map test cases/test sets from one project to another. It can get very cluttered if no organization process implemented from beginning, both requirements and test cases/test sets. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the concept of the custom report generator. It would work even better if it were possible to create custom reports without the need to have Administrator rights.

I like the custom fields. It would work even better if it were possible to change the ordering of the custom fields in the dialog screens. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Requirements is listed under "Planning". I could not find them at first use.

The non-standard custom report templates do not allow complex queries. I want to be able to execute SQL queries with joins, for example to list associations between requirements and test cases.

The custom reports do not allow to set the header and footer sections of MS Word reports. I cannot generate reports in the style that is prescribed by our company governance process.

The number of standard item types is too limited. I would like to be able to add explanatory text blocks to my requirements, so that I can generate complete reports in company style. Also, I want to be able to structure requirements in chapters, but without the chapter titles being requirements as well.

For a first draft of a requirements document, I want to be able to renumber the requirement IDs. For non-tech people, it is difficult to read documents that have non-contiguous numbering.

I want to be able to layer requirements, so that I can manage all requirements in a single project, but still be able to generate MRS, SRS, PRS, HRS, SWRS, etc. documents.

I want to be able to store and re-use "company-standard" requirements. That way I only need to specify deviations when I have a new project.

The two views on the requirements list are cumbersome to work with Why not combine them into a single view, like JAMA Contour does? Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Simple dashboard creation and defect list view the excel plug in to upload scripts is also very useful and great to use once set up Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

speed of page refresh and load could be better Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Provides most functionality relevant to Test Management, regular version updates providing enhanced functionality, licensing model is well priced. Well supported by Inflectra, prompt responses to any queries/requests. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Improved UI would be beneficial though current version is acceptable. Reporting functions can be simplified and more user friendly Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I used other products like MS TFS, (HP /QC and QTP) and Rational IBM Suite, very expensive, for big projects and big companies, with poor customer support. But SpiraTeam is the best for small teams, different methodologies, and excellent customer support. The integration with the other Inflectra products (Rapise Test, Spira Plan, and Spira Test) is very comprehensive, the same with the Rapise Objects and scripts in Rapise Test for automation, allowing the development of automated test cases across many technologies. Rapise Test, for developing automated test cases in Dot Net web systems and IIS, is a very easy, fast, and accurate product. During the execution of automated test cases, the scripts run very fast and provide full reports with pass or fail results. The same applies to changes and maintenance of scripts. The best part of the product is the dashboard and the reporting modules, providing comprehensive information. Spira Team allows configuring all the projects and managing them very easily and quickly, from requirements, stakeholders, tasks, card time, with the inclusion of appropriate documents. Moreover, it allows the development of the testing plan (with manual and automated testing, with integration in Rapise Test), execution testing, incoming and management of defects, bugs, and incidents. The same applies in the Tracing Module for releases, tasks, and source code. The integration with other Inflectra products (Rapise Test, Spira Plan, and Spira Test) and other software companies is very comprehensive and easy to configure. The other Inflectra Products, I hadn't time to evaluate, but the documentation is good and they look very promising. Spira Team and Rapise Test are used in Health Systems in Cordoba City - Republic Argentina-Evaluation of Inflectra Products. Spira Team is the best ALM product (comparing quality and price) that I know. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At the moment, all is good in Spira Team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The Customer Service is always quick and efficient to answers questions or issues, which have been few in the 4 years we have been on the product. They continue to develop new features and add to the base product, which is only helping it to grow and stay current with the latest development trends. I love that we have a turn-key solution hosted for us at an affordable price, something no other product we looked at could provide us for the money we had to spend. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love that I am able to write custom queries to extract whatever data I need to get to, but the output of the data into a nice format I can turn over to upper-level management can be time-consuming. We love being able to track resource time on tasks and incidents, but the Time Card feature is only a basic input page and needs some updating and feature options to enhance its user-friendliness. The user manual specifies the basics of using the product, but I would like to see a better Admin manual for setting up the product to accommodate multiple industries. We've figured it out for ourselves, with the help of Support, but I would love to have a manual I could reference which evolves as the industry does. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ease of use, intuitive GUI design, good use of colour, Integration with 3rd party plugins for automation and code management tools. Competitively priced - the features for the money are exceptional. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some of the 3rd Party plugins are buggy and getting the support team to fix these issues can take a very long time due to the periods between upgrades. Reporting features in SpiraTeam are limited. Needs to solidify its Agile features. Constantly compared to Jira which is viewed as having stronger Agile features. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.