SAP Risk and Assurance Management Reviews & Product Details

It's built on SAP BTP, and data is exchanged with S/4HANA and our GRC landscape via OData services. The risk and issue records have fields for scores and status. The site supports SAML single sign-on login. We'll pull the register into our BI layer via API call and refresh the scenario models from the register. There are no file exports. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Initially, the WORK PACKAGE is responsible for scheduling the works, and it was a real headache. Getting automated runs to work during financial periods and holidays had to take a turn rapidly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about SAP Risk and Assurance Management is its ability to bring risk, controls, and assurance activities together in one place. It provides better visibility into potential risks, helps streamline control monitoring and assessments, and supports more consistent reporting. I also appreciate how it can reduce manual work and help teams identify issues earlier, making risk management more proactive and efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One area I find challenging about SAP Risk and Assurance Management is that it can feel complex at first, especially for new users. Some processes require multiple steps, and the interface could be more intuitive and easier to navigate. Simplifying workflows and providing clearer guidance within the system would improve the overall user experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There's a lot of green light after a while because of the Control evidence. The monitoring is done on all transactions, not just some of them, which changes the way we work with external audit. We didn't get rid of the walk-throughs, but we did reduce the number of exceptions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

To be honest, the work package scheduler was a bit of a joke at first. We made a big leap forward in getting automated control on financial periods and holiday calendars to settle into a more stable position. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It’s actually helpful for maintaining compliance within the organization as part of the day-to-day workflow. It documents internal controls and links them with the business. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only dislike I can mention is the training required for new personnel to learn the software. That said, every tool needs training at first, so it’s understandable and necessary. Still, it remains one of the required tasks for trainees. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The most helpful aspect of SAP Risk and Assurance Management is its ability to centralize risk, compliance, and audit activities into a single platform. It improves visibility across processes, enables better monitoring of controls, and helps organizations identify and mitigate risks proactively. The biggest upsides are improved governance, streamlined compliance reporting, automation of manual assurance tasks, stronger collaboration between teams, and better decision-making through real-time insights and analytics. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The least helpful aspect of SAP Risk and Assurance Management is its complexity. Implementation, customization, and user adoption can take significant time and resources, and some reporting or workflow features may not be as intuitive without additional configuration or training. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that SAP Risk and Assurance Management centralizes risk management, compliance tracking, and monitoring in one place. It improves visibility into potential risks across the organization, helps us take timely action, and makes it easier to maintain accountability. I also value being able to stay proactive rather than reactive: we can identify risks early, assign responsibilities, and track actions until issues are resolved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes, I find the workflows complex and manual data entry time-consuming. Configuring workflows and adapting SAP Risk and Assurance Management to my business needs also took some time. More automation and simpler setups would help me manage risks and compliance more efficiently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that SAP Risk and Assurance Management automates control testing, integrates well with other SAP programs, and helps support policy requirements. It also automates many tasks, so I don’t have to enter everything manually. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

My initial setup took a while, and it required a lot of updates. It also took some time to set up workflows and controls, and a few things during the setup process required me to contact support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The most helpful aspect of SAP Risk and Assurance Management is how seamlessly it brings risk monitoring, compliance, and audit activities together in one centralized system. By consolidating these critical functions, the platform reduces the need for multiple disconnected tools and helps ensure that all stakeholders are working from consistent, reliable information. Its control automation is especially valuable because it cuts down on manual effort, reduces the chance of human error, and frees teams to focus on higher level strategic work instead of repetitive compliance checks. The dashboards also provide real time visibility into risks, compliance status, and audit findings, enabling management to make faster, better informed decisions. This transparency not only improves efficiency, but also strengthens accountability across the organization. In addition, the system’s ability to align with regulatory requirements helps keep compliance standards consistently met, lowering exposure to penalties and reputational risk. Overall, it supports a proactive approach to risk management while enhancing operational resilience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the least helpful aspects of SAP Risk and Assurance Management is the overall complexity of the system, especially for new users. The interface can feel overwhelming, and the steep learning curve often requires additional training or external support before teams can use it effectively. Configuring compliance workflows and customizing dashboards can be time-consuming, and in many cases, organizations need specialized expertise to fully leverage the platform’s capabilities. This slows down adoption and makes it harder for smaller teams without dedicated IT resources to benefit from the system. Another downside is performance when handling very large datasets or running detailed audit reports, as the system can sometimes lag or take longer than expected to generate results. This impacts efficiency during critical compliance checks or audits. While the platform is powerful, the complexity and resource requirements can limit accessibility, making it less user friendly compared to simpler, more lightweight risk management tools Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best is that SAP Risk and Assurance Management keeps risks, controls, and assurance work in one place. It makes follow-up easier and gives better visibility for audits and reporting. The SAP integration is also helpful because it connects risk work more closely to business processes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main thing I dislike is that the system can feel complex at the beginning. Some setup and configuration take time, and the navigation is not always very intuitive. Reporting is useful, but customizing reports could be easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Reduce lag by Automated data reviews, Easy integration With Sap Hana. Connectivity with SAP Analytics Cloud helps easy sharing or display of data across multiple departments Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Initial training is time-consuming as the interface is complex, and usually causes authorization issues when the same user has multiple access or authorization Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.