I like that I can put together quick designs and get a result without having to spend a lot of time on it, as you do with other competitors' software. What's more, if I want to refine it, I have all the tools at hand that some competitors simply don't offer. I like that the product is under continuous development, that they listen to our suggestions and respond incredibly quickly to our queries. They have the best customer service and they help me out whenever I get stuck on something. They've also recently added an AI model, which makes it even more convenient and user-friendly. Of course, it isn't perfect yet, but it's heading in the right direction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like less is the bankability. The energy yield from RatedPower is still not accepted by most lenders, so for the financing we have to do the model again in PVsyst, which takes time on every project. I understand the industry is conservative and this is not only on RatedPower. For now it is more a design tool for us than a yield tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like the user interface; it's really easy to start a new project. Additionally, I find it extremely beneficial that, when making modifications, they are saved separately.

Customer service is another high point: they are always willing to help or solve any problem.

The implementation of projects is super simple; truly, one can have a project ready in a matter of hours. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The project settings are quite limited and do not allow for real customization. Additionally, the integration with other tools, such as PVSyst, does not work very well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the speed, imagery, and data that RatedPower produces. It's useful for me to be able to download various file types for site design and financials. The quality and speed of iterations are impressive, and it offers more functionality compared to our previous tool. The initial setup was also very easy for me, which was a big plus. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think RatedPower could improve in a few areas. The measuring tool needs the ability to determine acreage, which would be really helpful. Also, it would be great if there was capability to upload XLSM files. When it comes to BESS, editing options for moving roads and containers need more flexibility. These enhancements would definitely make it more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about RatedPower is its ability to quickly generate optimized utility-scale solar PV plant designs with accurate energy yield estimates. The platform significantly reduces engineering time by automating plant layout, electrical design, cable routing, and preliminary BOQ generation. Its seamless integration with PVSyst and user-friendly interface make it an excellent tool for feasibility studies, design optimization, and project development, enabling faster and more informed engineering decisions.

Also, ability to integrate the BESS solution especially required here in the Philippines for more than 10MW capacity Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would like to see more customization options for electrical design and reporting, improved performance for large-scale projects, and better integration with other engineering software. These enhancements would make the platform even more efficient for utility-scale solar PV development.

For example, there is limitation only in terms of system voltage for the interconnection point, if the project is less than 34.5kV such as 24kV, 13,8kV, 13.2kV, 11kV, 4.6kV, 2.4kV considering the interconnection point is not the grid or connected in distribution utility. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Strongest feature of RatedPower is speed. A preliminary design that would normally take hours or days in traditional AutoCAD workflows can be generated in minutes. This makes it useful during project screening, land acquisition studies, and feasibility assessments. They also excels at producing optimized layouts based on the site constraints, equipment selection and terrain conditions and ability to test multiple design configuration in a short period. Also the interface is user friendl. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While RatedPower is excellent for preliminary design and technical development, it still requires engineering validation for detailed design. On complex sites, I often need to manually refine layouts, and tasks such as earthworks, drainage, and geotechnical design require additional tools. I would also like more flexibility in customizing layout rules and reports, along with support for a wider range of equipment combinations, as the current workflow is limited to using a single PV module and inverter model per design. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find RatedPower incredibly useful for its ability to quickly design and size PV systems, evaluate expected energy yield, and automate design tasks. The automatic design and energy yield calculations really save me time, and the energy yield simulation helps in quickly evaluating different options and optimizing the overall PV system. Its ease of analyzing PV system configurations stands out to me. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing that could be improved in RatedPower is having an automatic link between the design section and the related table. This would reduce the need for manual updates and make the workflow more efficient. Also, the initial setup wasn't very easy for me; it took some time to understand. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

User interface, easiness to use, quality and reliability of work, great support, training sessios, integration with PVsyst and CAD. Great investment for larger teams and multiple users. The addition of BESS planning is a real plus, as market demands for hybrid projects increase. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Price is less suitable for smaller companies with smaller teams, but will definitely be a time saver, as professional quality layouts can be done in a few minutes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are several things I like:

1. the support is great. Online meetings and onboarding session as well as the digital materials.

2. For an early stage design, you can produce very detailed documents and analysis.

3. I can customize schemes to make work faster.

4. The output is ready to be sent to customer, no need to modify. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For me it is a bit complicated to understand the hierarchy. Make a site, design, once I edit or save the layout cannot modify certain parameters. So usually I end up 20-30 saved version. I think this can be changed by practicing more. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The biggest upside of using RatedPower is that it automates the layout and calculations that would otherwise take hours — I can put together a project in just a few clicks. I also appreciate that it instantly generates technical documentation and reports, which speeds up the whole workflow from concept to final design. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Two things I find least helpful: the lack of flexibility for agrivoltaic layouts, since a single parcel may need different panel arrangements and orientations across different zones, and the absence of a dedicated solution for low-voltage connections. Both are areas where I'd like to see improvement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like RatedPower for its intuitive interface, which is quite easy to navigate. It's a quick and straightforward tool that allows me to prepare several documents like layouts, SLDS, and reports, even for colleagues without an engineering background, by following our guidelines. The technical support is great, and there's a continuous effort to further expand the features. It's very important for the development of our early stage plans to have an easy-to-use, fast tool that can quickly generate multiple designs and comparisons. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The part of BESS is currently useful mostly for layout purposes and simple reporting. Different dispatch strategies, and multiple revenue models should be made available in order to perform a meaningful simulation and financial analysis. Currently for revenue calculation, we can only upload a file with energy price forecasts. We need to be able to simulate all available markets, besides day ahead, including intra day, ancillary services, capacity market, etc. BESS projects must participate in multiple revenue streams in order to be profitable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.