--- title: Fish Audio Reviews meta_title: 'Fish Audio Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter 84 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how Fish Audio works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.6 review_count: 84 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-08-12' parent_category: name: Synthetic Media url: https://www.g2.com/categories/synthetic-media --- # Fish Audio Reviews **Vendor:** OpenAudio **Category:** [Text to Speech Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/text-to-speech) **Average Rating:** 4.6/5.0 **Total Reviews:** 84 ## About Fish Audio Fish Audio is an AI voice platform for creators, developers, and enterprises - bringing together text-to-speech, voice cloning, voice design, and audio APIs to produce natural, expressive, and controllable speech. At its core is s2.1-pro, built for emotionally expressive speech across 83 languages with production-grade speed and reliability, including Time-to-First-Audio as low as 70ms. Teams use Fish Audio for narration, dubbing, localization, AI characters, conversational agents, call centers, and other integrations where TTS is a core component. Beyond TTS, voice cloning and Voice Design let you reuse custom voices or generate new ones from a written description, shaping not just what a voice says, but how it sounds and feels. For enterprises, Fish Audio offers production-ready infrastructure with direct engineering support, Zero Data Retention, self-hosted deployment, HIPAA-aligned configurations, and an in-progress SOC 2 Type II audit. Try Fish Audio out here: https://fish.audio/developers/ ## Fish Audio Reviews ### 1. Free API Credits and Rich Timbres That Bring Real Personality to Hermes **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** funny A. | developer, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 04, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I’ve been using fish-audio’s product on my 4070 Ti Super graphics card ever since it was first open-sourced. Over the past two months, they’ve been offering free API credits, which has made them the only voice provider for my Hermes agent. When the free period ends, I’m willing to pay for the service. We all know that current LLM responses aren’t always perfect, but adding specific timbres makes them sound completely different. It gives the whole system a sense of soul and personality. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** I honestly think it would be even better if they released more open-source ONNX inference models for CPU use. That would really encourage more people to start using TTS models, and once they try them, they likely won’t want to go back. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** They’ve been producing high-quality, highly flexible speech-generation models along with supporting API services. Personally, I’m just an ordinary developer who works from home, and this speech service genuinely fills a big part of my spiritual void. I chose a neutral, plain voice—nothing especially unique or eye-catching—but Fish Audio’s voice is always there with me while I work, and it’s become a steady companion during my day. ### 2. Can't love audio tags enough! **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Daniel F. | FUNDADOR de ComidaCaseraParaPerros.Club y OllasOnline.com, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 04, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** The audio tags are awesome; the way you can enhance the results by using these tags just makes Fish Audio way better than any other model I've used in the past. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** It's not a total dislike, but not really knowing if voices in the catalog fail to comply with copyright laws might be the only concern I have **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** The extra layer of emotions that Fish Audio provides is a game-changer. Being able to produce audio in which a voice conveys the same emotion as a human being's blows my mind. From a budgeting perspective, I've been using the API, which proves to be cost-efficient for the results produced. Conecting the API to my code was easy and straight forward, reducing the time spent on configurations and such, to process TTS files. The performance is really good, it just takes seconds to process a script of about 8 to 10 minutes long. I have tried the app, I like how easy is to use it, but I only use it to try and test voices, as I mainly use it thru the API. I have read and used the documentation, both for developers and tutorials for the app, the information is clear enough you'll barely have to contact support or dig into further documentation to find what you need. Overal, it is easy to use and implement, is a bargain for the price (per 1M tokens at least), and the results are awesome! ### 3. Seamless Audio Generation with Realism and Speed **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Niranjan Y. | Founder, Media Production, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 03, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** What I like best is honestly the voice realism ,it makes a real difference when you're narrating scripture, since anything that sounds robotic breaks the meditative tone immediately. The Python SDK is genuinely easy to work with too; I had it integrated into my pipeline within an afternoon, and it's saved me a ton of manual recording time. Speed matters a lot for how I use it. My pipeline runs mostly unattended, generating audio in concurrent batches, and Fish Audio holds up well under that load without the latency becoming a bottleneck. Getting started was refreshingly simple API key, voice ID, and I was already generating usable audio. We actually switched over from ElevenLabs mainly because of cost. For a pipeline that's running daily and generating a high volume of audio, Fish Audio's pricing made a lot more sense without giving up quality **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** Pronunciation of certain English terms can be hit or miss sometimes. Numbers are a specific pain point , for example, "7000" sometimes gets read out as "seven zero zero zero" instead of "seven thousand," and the behavior seems inconsistent depending on formatting, whether it's written as 7000, 7,000, or attached to something like a year or unit. The bigger issue for me is that when I'm running the pipeline fully hands-off with concurrent requests, a handful of segments occasionally come out sounding noticeably robotic , off enough that I have to catch them, delete them, and manually restart that part of the pipeline. For a setup that's supposed to run unattended, that manual step defeats the purpose a bit. What would actually fix this for me is some kind of confidence score per segment, so I could programmatically tell whether the output is genuinely close to the voice clone or not. Even better would be if Fish Audio handled retries server-side automatically when a segment falls below quality, instead of leaving it to me to catch on the client side. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Before Fish Audio, recording voiceovers manually was the biggest bottleneck in my content pipeline. Now that's fully automated , I can generate high-quality, authentic-sounding narration for scripture content without sitting down to record anything myself. Between the voice realism and the Python SDK, it's saved me hours per video and let me scale up how much content I can put out. ### 4. Smooth Voiceover Creation at an Unbeatable Price **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Chiagozie O. | Fullstack PHP Developer , Computer Software, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 22, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I appreciate that Fish Audio generates my voice overs well, observing punctuations and story flow, especially with the S2 model. I like the smoothness and speed of generation, the quality of the audio, the very cheap pricing, and the ease of use for both the platform and API integration. It saves me time and money, making me worry less. The initial setup was really smooth without any confusion. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** One thing I think needs to be improved are the number of available default voices, it will really help very much. I need more default options more specifically storytelling voices. Different varieties, voices that can capture my audience when they watch my videos would be great. I've seen such voices in other people's videos; they are really calm and make you feel like you are sinking into the story as you hear them, not rushed. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Fish Audio generates my voice overs well, observing punctuations and story flow. It's smooth, fast, high-quality, affordable, and easy to use, both on the platform and with API integration, saving me time and money. ### 5. Fast, Natural, and Cost-Effective Voiceovers **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Pedro R. | Banking Professional and YouTube Content Creator, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 26, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** What I like best about Fish Audio is the natural quality of the generated voices. The speech sounds expressive and human, with realistic pacing, pronunciation, and tone, which makes it suitable for professional video narration. I also value the voice cloning feature because it allows me to maintain a consistent voice across different projects without recording every script manually. This has significantly improved my workflow, saving me many hours when producing long-form videos and short content. The platform is easy to use, generates audio quickly, and offers a strong balance between quality and cost. For me, the biggest benefit is being able to create professional and consistent voiceovers much faster than with a traditional recording process. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** Occasionally, pronunciation and emotional consistency can vary in longer scripts. More control over pauses, pacing, and emphasis would make the editing process even better. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Fish Audio solves the need for fast, professional voiceovers without recording everything manually. It saves me time, reduces production costs, and helps me create consistent narration for videos more efficiently. ### 6. Fast, Reliable Zero-Shot Voice Cloning with Impressively Authentic Audio Character **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Денис . | Full Stack Developer, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 23, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** The quality of the zero-shot voice cloning is the biggest advantage for me. It doesn't just copy the speaker's voice - it also preserves the recording characteristics. For example, if the reference audio has a vintage radio sound with limited frequencies, the generated speech keeps that same effect instead of sounding artificially clean. Another thing I really like is the generation speed. Even on the free developer tier, most requests are completed in about 2-4 seconds, which makes experimentation very convenient. Reliability has also been excellent. I've generated 500+ clips over about a month and haven't experienced a single failed generation or API error. That level of consistency is something I really appreciate when integrating a TTS service into my own projects. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** Overall, I don't have any major complaints, but there are a few areas where I'd like to see improvements. The biggest one is voice cloning customization. The zero-shot cloning quality is already excellent, but I can still hear that the voice and speaking style become slightly averaged compared to the original speaker. I'd love to have an optional fine-tuning workflow through the API (or another way to improve voice identity with more training data) for projects where maximum similarity is important. I also mainly generate speech in Russian. While the multilingual support is good, I find it harder to control emotions and pronunciation than in English. The emotion tags are sometimes difficult to use consistently, and stress placement or intonation can occasionally be inaccurate. Finally, there are a few edge cases. If the input text has almost no context (for example, only laughter or repetitive sounds) or lacks punctuation, the model can sometimes get stuck, stretch short inputs into much longer audio, or produce artifacts. I've also occasionally heard brief robotic distortion when cloning very loud or shouting voices, although this has been quite rare. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Fish Audio allows me to add high-quality, real-time voice synthesis to Twitch streams through its API. I built a custom TTS service that reads viewers' messages when they redeem channel points, and I use it both on my own channel and on channels of several friends. The fast response time and reliable API make the interaction feel almost instantaneous, which is important during live broadcasts. Viewers really enjoy hearing different cloned voices, and it makes the streams much more engaging and entertaining. For me, Fish Audio solved the problem of finding a TTS service that combines natural-sounding voices, fast generation, and an API that is easy to integrate into custom applications. It has become one of the core features of my Twitch projects ### 7. Expressive Controls Make Fast, Natural Chinese Voice Prototyping Easy **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** 伟 . | Content Creator, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 21, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I tested Fish Audio in my short-form content workflow on a mobile browser. For a Chinese running narration, I selected the “AD学姐” voice, entered a 139-character script, and placed [吼叫] at the opening and [强调] before two key phrases. Fish Audio generated two separate seven-second takes in a few seconds. The Chinese pronunciation was clear, and the tags noticeably changed the delivery, so I could compare pacing and emphasis without recording the line myself or editing it in an audio program. That fast script-to-audio loop is the part I find most useful. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** The mobile web layout is the main weakness I noticed during this test. After I generated the second take, both 0:07 audio players appeared below the editor, while the Generate button, speaker controls, and the 139/500 character counter were all competing for the same narrow screen. Comparing the two takes required scrolling and remembering which result was which. I would like each result to show the voice, model, tags/settings, timestamp, and credit usage, with labels such as Take 1 and Take 2. Some controls also remained in English even though the rest of the interface was Chinese. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** My immediate use case is prototyping voice-over for Chinese running and training posts before I publish them. Normally I would record the same sentence several times, transfer the files, trim them, and listen again to compare emphasis. In this test I pasted one 139-character line, changed the inline direction tags, and received two seven-second alternatives almost immediately. That let me decide whether the opening should sound forceful and whether the key phrases needed emphasis before doing any final recording. It reduces repeated recording and editing work and gives me a quick audio check while the script is still being revised. ### 8. From robotic voices to characters with a life of their own **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Miguel Angel d. | Desarrollador senior, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 21, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** UI/UX: The interface is straightforward: paste the text, choose the voice, generate. No hidden menus or learning curves. The only thing I would improve is the visual design, which feels somewhat outdated compared to similar tools. AI / Intelligence: The quality of the voices is what surprised me the most. The intonation is natural, with pauses and emphasis that don't sound robotic. For a project with more than 15 characters, that's key — each voice has its own personality without it being noticeable that it's AI. Performance: Generating audio takes seconds, not minutes. What used to take me an entire afternoon editing tones in external software now I resolve in 10-15 minutes within the same platform. Pricing / ROI: The balance recharge system is ideal for personal projects. I load $5 when I need it instead of paying $30+ monthly for a fixed subscription that I wouldn't fully use. In months of use, I haven't spent more than $10/month. Support / Onboarding: The initial setup is ridiculously easy — create an account, choose a voice, and in 5 minutes you're generating audio. I didn't need to watch tutorials or contact support to get started. Integrations: This is where it falters the most. There is no documented public API or plugins for video editors or DAWs, so the entire flow is manual: generate, download the file, and import it where you need it. A direct integration with editing tools would save a lot of time. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** The interface feels outdated compared to other similar tools. For example, the buttons and panels have a design reminiscent of platforms from several years ago, which makes navigation not as intuitive as it could be. This is especially noticeable when searching for voices: having two separate catalogs (Community Voices and Featured Voices) without a clear explanation of the difference between them forces me to open multiple tabs to compare, when a single unified view with filters would be more efficient. Suggestion: unify both catalogs into a single interface with filters by type (community/featured), gender, language, and use case. Also, updating the visual design with a more modern style (clean typography, cards with preview, fewer clicks to get to what you're looking for) would greatly improve the experience without requiring deep changes in the backend. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Before Fish Audio, I was stuck with generic TTS robotic voices that killed the personality of my characters. I had more than 15 different voices I needed, and each one required either a different voice actor (very expensive) or hours editing tone and speed in audio software to make them sound minimally natural. With Fish Audio, I now generate voices with natural intonation in seconds. The catalog is so extensive that each character has their own distinctive voice without them repeating or sounding artificial. What used to take me an entire afternoon of editing now takes me 10-15 minutes. Additionally, the balance recharge system instead of a fixed subscription has allowed me to keep the project active for months, spending only what I actually use — about $5-10 a month instead of $30+ for fixed plans I don't need. In summary: I went from struggling with robotic voices and slow processes to having a workflow where I create natural voices for any character in minutes, with a cost that fits my real budget. ### 9. Cloned My Voice in 15 Seconds - Now It Narrates All My Videos **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Dragos B. | Developer, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 22, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I clone my own voice and use it to narrate all my YouTube videos. Fish Audio cloned my voice from a 15-second clip in under two minutes — the result is good enough that people can't tell it apart from my real voice in a blind test. The emotion control is what makes it actually usable for video: I tag sections with (excited) or (calm) and the delivery genuinely shifts. It supports 83 languages including Romanian, which is why I switched from ElevenLabs. The free S2.1 Pro API with no hard usage cap is wired into my content pipeline. And unlike ElevenLabs, they don't claim perpetual rights over your voice data. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** The web app is slow for long narrations — I use the API instead. Emotion tag placement takes some trial and error **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** The main problem: I needed consistent, natural-sounding voiceovers for my YouTube videos without recording every line myself. Recording and re-recording narration was eating hours per video. Fish Audio cloned my voice once, and now I just feed it the script. What used to take an hour of recording now takes seconds of generation. The second problem: cost. I was paying $22/month for ElevenLabs, and it still couldn't handle Romanian content properly. Fish Audio's free S2.1 Pro API handles both English and Romanian cleanly, with no hard usage cap — so I dropped the ElevenLabs subscription entirely. The benefit: I produce more videos, faster, in two languages, for less money. The emotion control means the narration doesn't sound flat, and the API integration means it's just one step in my pipeline. ### 10. Impressive Audio Generation with Room for Improvement **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Alexander J. | Chef, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 22, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I like Fish Audio for its high-quality cloned voices and the incredible speed it provides. The ability to create almost infinite cloned voices using public voices is quite impressive. I love the expressions you can use and all the effects that come with it. It's basically the best audio voice generation I've tested, and I've tested quite a lot. Additionally, it comes with an API and you can run it locally if you have a strong enough graphics card, which I find bloody amazing. The setup is pretty effortless as well; the API is self-explanatory and I didn't face any issues integrating it. Even running it locally was straightforward. And most important it cost 1/10 the price of competitors. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** I'm missing a feature in Fish Audio that allows combining two(or multiple) speakers to make one output automatically, something I could do in Gemini TTS to create dialogues. I have to solve it manually, which is less convenient. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Fish Audio TTS lets me create diverse voices for my simulator, handling high-quality voice generation with expressive effects and fast output. It's easy to use, even locally if needed. ### 11. High-Quality, Emotional Voices with Fast, Easy-to-Use API **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Fernando Henrique de C. | Software Engineer, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 21, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** The voices are high quality, with great emotion and plenty of customization options, crazy fast responses of the api, and it’s easy to use across my applications I've developed. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** Sometimes, even when I use emotion tags, the speech still comes out blunt and dull, as if there were no emotion tags in the first place, and it happens fairly often. Also, at times the character’s voice suddenly changes completely mid speech. For example, a female voice turning into a male voice, or a soft voice becoming extremely high pitched. Another point is that when calling the api regarding fetching voices in the fish audio catalogue, it is very inefficient, not to say impossible to use. There is an extreme amount of delay for fetching random voices for the user to preview them. Finally, it’s quite rare, but near the end of a line there’s a chance it will start making weird sounds, like it’s working out really hard breathy and out of breath, etc. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** I’m using fish audio to develop highly interactive and immersive AI companions, and users have already told me that the voice quality is amazing. ### 12. High-Quality Cost Efficiency TTS. **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Luis E. | CTO, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 28, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I love that Fish Audio solved the latency problem and improved the text-to-speech quality, especially with the emotional aspect and support for different languages. I like how they are making improvements in latency and how their text-to-speech sounds more human, incorporating emotions as a core functionality. They improved the retention and continuity of conversations in our product, making it more natural and appealing for users. Plus, their cost is actually a great deal. Finally, the initial setup was fairly easy, using WebRTC, which was great. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** Sometimes when we use the WebSocket connection with the API, the TTS gets stuck in a loop and repeats phrases. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Fish Audio solves latency and improves text-to-speech quality, supporting emotions and different languages, making conversations more natural and appealing. It enhances our user interaction by improving retention and continuity, sounding more human-like, which is key for our AI teddy bear project. ### 13. Versatile TTS Solution with Powerful Customization **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Marcus L. | Audio Engineer, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 07, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I like Fish Audio's free API and its elegant web app UI/UX. I appreciate that the model is available to download for local inference. The fine-grained control over results with emotion control tags and sound effect tags is very beneficial, allowing me to use tags like [angry], [sad], [whispering], etc., to change the tone of the voice and make it sound extremely natural. The initial setup was easy; I just needed to find the voice I wanted and type in the content I wanted to hear that voice say. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** Non-commercial usage on free tier or the local model was very distasteful. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** I use Fish Audio for generating audio files from text for my gaming voice acting assets. It provides a free API, elegant web app UI/UX, and downloadable models for local inference. I have fine-grained control with emotion control tags, making the voice sound extremely natural. ### 14. Great Voice Quality at a Reasonable Price, with Easy Training and Setup **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Taehwan J. | Creator, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 10, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** Great voice quality at a reasonable price. The training process is fast and easy to follow, and the overall setup is straightforward. The quality of the generated voices has also improved a lot recently and is now quite good. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** The emotion and style controls are a nice feature, but they can be a bit cumbersome to use through the API. You have to choose from predefined categories, and there are quite a few of them, so it’s difficult to remember which options are available. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** I use it to create voiceovers for YouTube videos. Recently, the voice generation has become much more stable and reliable, so it’s very practical for regular use. Korean voice generation is especially good and sounds very natural. ### 15. Natural-Sounding TTS with Low Latency and Great Value **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Dmitry M. | CEO, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 03, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** The voice quality is excellent and sounds very natural. I also like the low latency, the wide variety of voices, and how easy it is to integrate into my workflow. It provides consistent results and offers great value compared to other TTS services. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** The main drawback is that some voices still have occasional pronunciation issues or minor artifacts, especially with longer texts. I would also like to see more advanced voice controls and improved documentation for developers. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Fish Audio helps me create high-quality voiceovers quickly without hiring voice actors or spending hours recording and editing audio. It has significantly reduced my production time and costs while allowing me to produce more content with consistent voice quality. ### 16. Simple API for Easy Audio Generation and Voice Cloning **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Health, Wellness and Fitness | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 08, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** The API is simple to use and we can browse and generate audios easily including with cloned voices. Performance seems correct but I didn't try to send multiple requests yet as our service based on Fish will soon be deployed in production. Pricing is still high for mass adoption. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** The "pause" in audio is not handled correctly. Also, the change between s2 and s2.1 introduced unexpected audio sound by the narrator that seems to be configurable but my tests remain ko still. Also, there are many voices for french voices that seem to have be stolen by famous french personalities so they can't be really used in production apps. Also, the french catalog of real great voices is too short. Also, the "emotions" are not handled well compared to latest google gemini voice that by default and without adding custom text instructions, is able to introduce tones in sentences. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** I am able to create live stories for endusers. ### 17. Effortless Audio Dubbing and Alignment **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Waly K. **Reviewed Date:** August 06, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I use Fish Audio to dub lessons for my LMS platform into different languages, and it's been an exclusive tool for creating audio files after translation. Compared to other platforms, Fish Audio is a lot more crisp, which I really appreciate. I like the ability to clone a voice, and their isometric plantations when creating audio files are very good, helping ensure the audio aligns perfectly second by second. This is crucial for translating course content where alignment with the video is essential. The initial setup of Fish Audio is very easy, just a couple of buttons need to be clicked for integration. Overall, it's a valuable tool for my needs. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** the clone quality can be very weak if a voice sample is provided in any other language from the intended translation language **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** I use Fish Audio to dub lessons, translating them to multiple languages. It's more crisp than other platforms and aligns second by second, which prevents the audio from drifting from the video during lessons. Its ease of voice cloning and precise audio creation make it valuable. ### 18. Mimics Voices Well, Simple Setup with AI Helper **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Computer Software | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 05, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I think Fish Audio is honestly amazing and really solid. I use it inside my application for an AI tutor, and it works perfectly. Setting it up was quite easy, which I really appreciated. The fact that they allow people to enter the s2.1 pro for free through the free trial was a great way to get me into it. I was a bit skeptical at first, but now I think it's amazing. I like how it can mimic voices and convey emotions. It's perfect for my tutor, making it actually talk like someone and have emotions, which helps make users feel like they're with someone. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** I think the voice itself can get better. It's still sometimes bot-like, like the default ones, and can feel a bit static. But if you find a good voice, then it's fine. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** I use Fish Audio in my AI tutor app, and it works perfectly. The easy setup with AI and the free trial are great. It mimics voices and conveys emotions, making interactions feel real. I switched from Azure, appreciating Fish Audio's lack of commitment requirements. ### 19. Affordable and Easy, with Impressive Voice Control **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Jason A. | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 05, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I use Fish Audio to create custom voices for faceless AI videos, and I've even cloned my own voice with it. What I really like about Fish Audio is how easy it is to use, especially how quickly you can create cloned voices that sound really good. The emotion control is a standout feature for me—it's crazy to think that you can put emotion behind each word in a sentence. I also appreciate that I can run it pretty much autonomously through Claude code using the API key, which makes video production straightforward. Additionally, the initial setup of Fish Audio was extremely easy, making it even more appealing. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** I think finding a voice is difficult, and I know there's a lot of user-generated voices on there that just either aren't good or don't match what the title of the voice is. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** I use Fish Audio for cost-effective voice cloning and custom voices in AI videos. It's easy to use and allows emotion control per word, which makes my content creation process efficient. ### 20. Revolutionizes Audio Books with Emotionally Expressive Voice Cloning **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Dave Zachary M. | Full-Stack Developer , Information Technology and Services, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 05, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I mainly use Fish Audio for its amazing Voice Cloning and Inline Tags to express emotions. The free usage is very beneficial to a solo developer like me. Fish Audio's open-source material helped me familiarize with SOTA TTS via local inference. I find the TTFA and open-source model to be amazing for getting started. My favorite feature is the Inline Tags for expressing emotions, which makes audio books more human and fun compared to other audio providers. The initial setup was very easy, and the documentation is quite easy to follow. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** I hope there are default voice identities. Fish Audio is basically only limited to Voice Cloning, and I have to use community-driven voices to access common voices. I'd like to have some voice identity at least similar to other audio providers. The open-source models are harder to properly implement than what's written. The docker image most likely uses the S1 model, which means my inline tags don't work properly. I had to download the S2 model and host it myself. I had to rewrite the hosting infrastructure/orchestrator. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** I find Fish Audio's Voice Cloning an excellent alternative to ElevenLabs. The Inline Tags help express emotions, making audiobooks engaging, and the free usage and open-source resources support me as a solo developer. ### 21. Natural AI Narration at a Fair Price **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Media Production | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 04, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I use Fish Audio to generate narration for a documentary-style YouTube channel about companies that failed or went bankrupt. I produce content in Portuguese, English, and Spanish, and the voice quality has been consistently good across all three languages. What I like most is that the voices sound natural enough for serious, long-form videos, while the API works well with my n8n automation. This saves me a lot of time because the narration is generated automatically as part of my production workflow. The cost is also reasonable compared with other voice platforms, especially for a project that needs a high volume of audio. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** Some sentences can still sound slightly artificial, especially in longer narration or when the tone changes several times. I also sometimes need to test different spellings to get the correct pronunciation of company names, people’s names, and foreign terms. The emotion tags are useful, but the results are not always fully consistent. In some cases, tags for pauses, emphasis, softer delivery, or stronger emotion have less impact than expected, or the voice applies them differently across sentences. I would like more precise control over pronunciation, pauses, emphasis, emotion, and the intensity of each tag through the API. Clearer documentation with practical examples for long-form and multilingual narration would also help. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Fish Audio solves one of the biggest challenges in my project: producing consistent narration for long-form YouTube documentaries in multiple languages without recording everything manually or hiring separate voice actors. I use it through the API in an n8n workflow to generate narration in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. This reduces production time, keeps the voice consistent across each video, and makes it easier to scale the channel. Another important benefit is the cost. Compared with other voice generation platforms I have tested, Fish Audio offers very good value for the quality delivered, especially for projects that need a high volume of narration. It also gives me the flexibility to test different voices, speeds, and emotional tags before choosing the final version. ### 22. Fast, Stable Japanese TTS with Production-Ready Consistency and Great Value **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Media Production | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 04, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I mainly use Fish Audio through the API for Japanese text-to-speech. The speed and stability are excellent. Japanese narration is also very consistent and more than good enough for real production use. Compared with other services, the pricing is lower, yet the accuracy is high and I rarely need to regenerate audio—so overall costs stay low. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** My main feedback is about Japanese text-to-speech. Phrase breaks are sometimes unnatural. Manually inserting commas (“、”) usually fixes it, but the model sometimes inserts pauses in places I want read in one continuous breath, which forces me to regenerate the audio. There’s no way to control intonation placement. This is especially painful with katakana proper nouns—I often have to regenerate multiple times. It tends to go wrong more often when a katakana proper noun comes at the start of a sentence or right after a phrase break. Being able to control pause points and pitch/intonation (especially for proper nouns) would significantly reduce rework. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Before Fish Audio, I used AWS text-to-speech, but it sounded mechanical and not very human. Fish Audio can speak with near-human intonation, so the narration quality of my YouTube videos improved a lot—and that raised the overall quality of the videos. ### 23. Affordable Quality for Immersive Voice Cloning **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** ZHONGHAO Z. | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 28, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I use Fish Audio for text-to-speech and voice cloning in my game project, which made the experience much more immersive. I really appreciate its affordable pricing combined with genuinely high-quality output. The audio quality is excellent and competitive with the best products out there. It's especially useful for creative projects; voice cloning makes it easy to give characters a consistent and immersive voice. The natural-sounding output helps the cloned character voice feel convincing rather than distracting. The initial setup was straightforward, allowing me to integrate the TTS and voice cloning seamlessly into the game. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** The main area I would improve is the update frequency. I would appreciate seeing product updates and improvements released more frequently. A clearer update cadence or roadmap would also make it easier to understand what is coming next. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** I find Fish Audio provides an affordable way to create natural-sounding, immersive character voices for my game project, eliminating the complexity and cost of traditional voice production. ### 24. Expressive TTS for Real-Time Voice Workflows **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Computer Software | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 22, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** What I like most is the developer workflow. The dashboard makes it easy to track TTS usage by model and manage voice references, while the API and streaming options integrate well with voice applications. I use Fish Audio in two personal voice-companion prototypes: one is built with LiveKit and uses Fish streaming TTS in its real-time voice pipeline; the other is built with Pipecat and uses Fish Audio across HTTP streaming and WebSocket-based real-time TTS. The expressive voice quality, model options, and parameter controls are useful for matching a voice to each character and interaction style. The usage dashboard also helps me monitor testing costs and performance while iterating on the voice experience. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** The main limitation I have found is fine-grained emotional and expressive-tag control in a real-time pipeline. A single model has to produce a useful reply and choose a precise tag for each sentence at the same time, so tags can occasionally feel mismatched to the content or intended emotion. A more structured tagging or preview workflow, plus clearer guidance on separating response generation from expression selection, would help. I also notice a substantial quality difference between S2.1 Pro Free and the paid S2.1 Pro tier. For my use case, it feels broader than TTFT: the overall naturalness, clarity, and consistency of the generated voice differ enough that model selection needs careful testing.I also found that the official default voice selection did not offer a clear Chinese default-voice option for my use case; the available defaults appeared to be oriented mainly toward Japanese and English voices. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Before Fish Audio, selecting TTS for a streaming real-time voice model meant balancing naturalness, voice-cloning quality, latency, and cost across different providers. Fish Audio gave me a practical option for both my LiveKit and Pipecat projects: its voices sound closer to a real person, and the cloned voices I tested retained high quality. This made it easier to standardize on one TTS provider while still testing different voice and model options. In my own comparison and iteration work, Fish Audio has offered stronger voice quality for the cost than the other TTS options I evaluated, allowing me to spend more of the budget on testing and improving the real-time voice experience.Deployment in a real-time voice pipeline was also relatively straightforward for me because Fish Audio TTS provides documented integrations for both Pipecat and LiveKit, so I could follow the documentation rather than build a custom TTS adapter from scratch. ### 25. Versatile Tool for Content Creation, Easy API Integration **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Medhansh P. | Co-Founder, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 22, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I really like the ability to use the API and I think the billing is pretty upfront and fair. The integration within my code and my editing software is great. I also enjoy using tags to determine how the audio will sound, which gives me more control over the voice itself. It's helpful to have a variety of different voices that people recognize, especially for creating Kaisen videos with characters like Gojo and Yuji. Fish Audio makes this process efficient and easy to use, and I appreciate that it's affordable and provides voice models I can't find elsewhere. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** I don't really have any issues with Fish Audio, maybe other than making the model sound less robotic and more human-like. Additionally, I had a small issue with the setup regarding using the API key and topping up the credits initially. I accidentally got the subscription when I just wanted to top up the API credits, spending an additional $15. It would be helpful if there was an option to refund unused credits. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Fish Audio solves the problem of using my own voice by providing diverse voices, some recognizable. It offers character voices like Gojo for my content, easy API use, and is affordable, greatly aiding my YouTube channel's production. ### 26. Stable, Natural-Sounding TTS with Great Value and Plenty of Voice Choices **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Computer Software | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 22, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I use Fish API, for Text To Speech (TTS). The API has been stable, and the application I built, provides timely notifications, in a natural sounding voice. The API costs are good compared to other models. For the application that I am building, having many voices to choose from benefit my users. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** Rate limits are on the low end. This means I have build a special queueing software to support many users. If Fish Audio were to mange this, as part of the API, it would benefit my software. This means my CloudFlare working has to do rate limiting, and queue the requests for many users. The cloned voices, are a great option, but it does not mean it is child or user friendly. I recently had to complete a form to publish my application with Microsoft Store - questions were asked if my application contains sexual, drugs, etc. And I was not able to answer no to this - meaning if I want to offer the many cloned voices within my application, I am not guaranteed of good age rating in the Microsoft Store - as there potentially could be some harmful content. If the TERMS and Conditions could cover this, it would be a great benefit - perhaps a curated list of voices, not only the official voices. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** NextUp Alert - the application I am building provides natural timely notifications. see https://www.nextupalert.com It helps people stay on time for meetings. The TTS feature is great, even though local TTS does it exist, it does not provide an as pleasing voices. ### 27. Realistic Voices That Make YouTube Content Professional **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in E-Learning | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 21, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** What I like best about Fish Audio is how realistic and natural the voices sound. I use it to create voiceovers for my YouTube videos, and it has made my content sound more professional and engaging. The platform is easy to use, saves me a lot of recording and editing time, and gives me access to different voices that suit various types of videos. Since using Fish Audio, I have seen positive growth in my channel, and it has become an important part of my content creation process. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** The main downside is that some voices occasionally mispronounce words or sound slightly unnatural when expressing strong emotions. I would also like more control over pacing, pronunciation and tone. Faster generation times and more flexible pricing for frequent YouTube creators would make the service even better. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Fish Audio solves the challenge of creating professional voiceovers without needing expensive recording equipment, voice actors or long editing sessions. It allows me to produce realistic narration quickly and consistently for my YouTube videos. This saves time and money, helps me publish content more regularly and improves the overall quality and engagement of my channel. ### 28. Natural voice-over with easy integration needs localization improvement **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Vyacheslav . | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 21, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I like the realism and naturalness of the voiceover in Fish Audio, as well as the accuracy of voice cloning. The service best conveys the characteristics of the original voice and works well with the Russian language. The natural sound helps my videos be perceived better and not resemble ordinary synthetic voiceovers, while accurate cloning preserves the recognizable voice in the clips. Also, I found it easy to understand the product's functionality: Text to Speech and voice cloning, and connecting the API to the bot went smoothly thanks to the clear documentation. Additionally, I use Fish Audio together with programs for editing short videos, and the service's API is integrated into my Telegram bot for generating custom voiceovers. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** I want to improve the performance of the Voice Changer with the Russian language, as the voice often gets distorted and a strong unnatural accent appears. In Story Studio, errors sometimes occur when regenerating fragments, and the voice quality seems lower than in regular Text to Speech. I would also like Cyrillic not to consume twice as many tokens for voiceover and API as Latin script. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Fish Audio allows me to quickly obtain natural voiceovers without speakers and gives users the ability to voice texts with different voices. Natural sound enhances video perception, and precise cloning preserves a recognizable voice. ### 29. Versatile Audio Platform with Great Variety, Needs Faster Voice Support **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Caitty G. | CEO, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 21, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I like Fish Audio because it offers a variety of roles, including famous ones like Taylor Swift and some Cartoon, which aren't supported by other platforms like Google. It has lots of different audio types, making it easy for users to search and select what they need. This makes it very good to use, as having all these audio types available is a huge plus. The platform's features, especially the variety of audio roles, mean I don’t have to create them from scratch, which would be very challenging. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** I think the API of Fish Audio can be improved as it can only handle at most ten API calls at one time, which I find not very good. Only after paying $100 can we increase this number, which is a limitation. Also, Fish Audio does not support voice call mode by default. Compared to Google's platform, which supports voice mode initially, Fish Audio's speed in transferring text to voice and vice versa is slow. Users may not feel comfortable using Fish Audio as it requires additional steps for voice mode. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** I use Fish Audio in my apps for backend audio selection and playback, which simplifies user interaction with AI. Users can easily search and pick audios. However, the API limits and slow speed compared to Google are drawbacks. ### 30. Generous Credits, Easy Cloning, Pro-Level Quality **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Marketing and Advertising | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 21, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** Fish Audio stands out for offering a generous amount of credits, a wide variety of voices, and an impressively easy cloning process. The release of the S2 and S2.1 Pro models has closed the quality gap that previously existed with longer texts, making it a serious competitor to ElevenLabs. The one area still developing is broader multilingual support — but that's something that will naturally improve over time. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** The only real downside is that the monthly credits can't be used via API — API calls are billed separately. That said, the API pricing is still very affordable, so it's a minor complaint. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Fish Audio solves the voiceover challenge in video production — giving me high-quality, realistic voice output without needing to hire voice actors or record myself. As a freelance video creator, this saves significant time and cost, and lets me deliver polished content to clients much faster. ### 31. Natural TTS for companion portals **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Ellie C. | Owner, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 22, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** The voice quality is easily the best part. I use Fish Audio in a custom AI companion portal, and when the TTS is strong, it completely changes the feel of the experience. The messages stop coming across like plain text on a screen and start to feel much more present, natural, and personal. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** Longer messages need to be split into chunks for reliable playback, which ends up adding extra integration work. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Fish Audio gives my custom companion portal a natural spoken voice. It makes messages feel more present and personal, improves accessibility and lets users hear specific replies through per-message read-aloud controls instead of only reading text. ### 32. Realistic Voices and Useful Emotion Tags, But Limited Library and Occasional Uncanny Shifts **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Marouane E. | Founder, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 31, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** The performance direction using tags which can add realism such as for emotions or breathing also the realism of their voices compared to other high qualitt TTS softwares **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** Limited voices library and the emotion direction can sound uncanney valley especially if there is alot of emotion tags switching in the paragraph **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Fish Audio has helped me deliver high-quality, realistic voices in my app, with performance direction and the option for users to clone their own voices. I also use it to let game developers prototype their game voices with Fish Audio first. ### 33. Affordable, High-Quality Voice Cloning Tool **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** VeeSal H. | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 01, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I use Fish Audio for creating YouTube videos, and I appreciate how cheap it is. The cloned voice is of good quality compared to other generators I've used. The initial setup was very easy for me since I'm a technical person using the API, and I created software connected to Fish Audio's API. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** I think the quality of the voice clone is really good, but when compared to Eleven Labs, it's not there yet. Maybe improving pronunciation and consistency could help because I do small TTS generation and sometimes one to another is a little bit different. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** I created a cloned voice with Fish Audio for my YouTube channels as I'm not a native English speaker. It's cheaper and better quality compared to other generators. ### 34. Super Good Voice Cloning That Is Almost Cost Free **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Taher A. | Game Programmer, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 21, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** It saves me time and money. I don’t need to record hours of audio for my videos anymore, I just clone my voice and let Fish Audio turn an entire script into my voice. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** I use an API from Fish Audio, and the emotion cues don’t always work the way you’d expect. For example, I might add something like [clear throat], and sometimes it just ignores it or produces a weird sound instead. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** It’s making my life easier by cloning my voice and quickly generating voiceovers for long scripts. ### 35. High-Quality TTS with Advanced Voice Cloning **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** JFree_23 F. | Academic & Science Tutor, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 23, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I really like Fish Audio for its high-quality text-to-speech with voice cloning, and it's offered at a really affordable price. The quality is great and practically on par with 11 Labs. What makes it even more exceptional is the ability to use emotional tags, which enhances the speech delivery significantly. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** Minimum top up over api is $50. Other than that no complaints **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** I use Fish Audio for high-quality text to speech with voice cloning at an affordable price. The emotional tags provide exceptional delivery, unlike most models. ### 36. The King of Voiceovers: Expressiveness and Variety in Abundance **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Ted D. | Content Manager, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 04, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I use Fish Audio for professional voiceover work. It is the best product on the market for making good voiceovers and narrations. I love its sensational expressiveness. I also enjoy the parameters and the voices that are already in the system. The variety of voices allows for a large number of voiceovers in many use cases. Additionally, Fish Audio is cheaper and better than other options, and the initial setup was extremely easy. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** Fidelity could improve a bit, although it's fine. I would like the expressiveness to be more natural. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Fish Audio is the best for doing good voiceovers and narrations thanks to its sensational expressiveness and variety of voices, allowing me to perform many voiceover tasks. ### 37. Accessible and simple API with impressive quality **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Сергей . | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 22, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I use the Fish Audio API for my website, and it solves issues with accessibility and quality. I like its accessibility, speed, and simplicity. I especially appreciate Fish Audio for the minimal delay in live broadcasts, which makes streams more lively and enjoyable to watch thanks to the quality of the voices. Additionally, the API is easy to integrate and use, proving to be clear and convenient in this regard. Setting up Fish Audio is simpler than with Elevenlabs. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** Probably a separate subscription for the API would be desirable, since I have no need to use the functionality on the website; there are streamers who use the API for that. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** I use the Fish Audio API to enhance accessibility and quality on my website, making streams more lively and enjoyable. It is characterized by speed and ease of integration, which is especially important for live broadcasts. ### 38. Natural Sounding TTS with Minor Stability Glitches **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 05, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I use Fish Audio for personal use in a Discord bot, and I find it allows people in my server to share text-to-speech generations across a number of voices both as files in text chat and in voice chat. It's far better than any alternative I've tried because the voices are extremely natural sounding and expressive at a fraction of the cost, especially with the S2 Pro model currently being free. I love that you can use square brackets to describe how audio should sound, like [shouted], and it actually works. This makes the bot more enjoyable to use and play around with. The initial setup of Fish Audio was very easy, just a matter of replacing a couple of API calls. I'm happy enough with Fish Audio that I'd rate it a 9 out of 10 on recommending it to a friend or colleague. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** I find it occasionally unstable. I experience occasional glitches during TTS generations, and sometimes the API is unavailable for short periods. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** I find Fish Audio offers extremely natural and expressive voices at a fraction of the cost. I like using square brackets to modify audio sound, which works well and makes it enjoyable. ### 39. Fast and Reliable with a Vast Voice Library **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 31, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I use Fish Audio for cloning voices and my other API projects, and I find it fast and reliable, making the process of doing lots of generations very quick and responsive. I like the simplicity and the reliability it offers. I appreciate the amount of voices available on the platform; it means I can find a celebrity's voice very easily or any voice I need. The initial setup was pretty easy, and I never encountered any issues. The pricing was amazing, making it appealing right from the start. Additionally, integrating it into my Python code with Gemini as the AI was really easy. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** Sometimes the website can be a little slow but apart from that I haven’t found any other issues in my over 5 months of usage. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** I find Fish Audio fast and reliable for generating voices quickly, with a wide variety that includes celebrities. Its simplicity allows me to include it easily in my Python projects. ### 40. Granular Voice Creation with High-Fidelity Output and an Best API **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** BMC . | Indie Dev, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 01, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I really appreciate the granularity available when creating a voice, the high fidelity and detail in the generated outputs, and how easy the API is to use. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** Time to First Audio can be a bit slow, sometimes taking up to 20 seconds for longer generations (for example, LLM replies over 600 tokens). **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** it's the best "bang for buck" when it comes to API pricing. I use it to voice my original AI companion creation. ### 41. Exceptional Quality and Cost, But Complicated Subscriptions **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 05, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I love the fact that Fish Audio is really cheaper compared to other services I've used, and the quality is really top-notch. I also appreciate the availability of different tracks and the speed of the APIs, which reduces latency. The integration into the application is incredibly easy and fast, I managed to integrate Fish Audio in less than 30 minutes. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** What I like less is the fact that you have to get a subscription before you can use the tickets, and on top of that, you have to pay for the tickets. So, if I pay for the subscription, I still have to pay to be able to use the tickets. That, however, is really not appealing. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Fish Audio allows me to have a natural transcription of sentences for my learning application. I like its affordable cost, top quality, and quick integration. The APIs are fast with little latency. ### 42. Natural voices and easy integration **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Marko P. | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 25, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I like the natural sound of voices in Fish Audio, which is very important for dubbing, so that the result looks like real human speech, not like machine reading of translated text. The integration of Fish Audio into our video production platform Voxion was simple, and the speed of voice generation was fast enough for our purposes. I also appreciate the ease of working with the API and the attractive cost. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** We would like to see more natural emotional expression and more subtle control over emotions in generated voices. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** We use Fish Audio to create more natural-sounding dubbing. We like the voice quality, speed, and cost. The integration was simple, and the API is user-friendly. We would like even more natural emotional expression and finer control over emotions in the generated voices. ### 43. Seamless Voice Integration with Minor Limitations **Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 24, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I use Fish Audio to enable the voice in my consumer app, which needs to generate explanations of museum and art galleries' exhibits. I really appreciate its nuanced voice and use their text-to-speech API as a developer to integrate it into my backend. I also value their billing and developer web console to monitor my spending and usage. I'm a fan of their voice library, which is community-based, offering a variety of options. The initial setup is extremely easy, needing just one API key to get started. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** I think Fish Audio has a pretty stringent concurrent limitation, especially for free users like myself who are just getting started. There's a limit of about five concurrent users at a time, which sometimes feels a bit limiting for my use case. Also, while Fish Audio has lots of great voices, some seem to be clones of famous entities, and I'm not really sure which ones I can use or not. It's unclear, and I want more guidance on what voices can be used commercially and what cannot. I find myself having to guess, and I wish they provided clearer guidance to help filter the voices for commercial use. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** I use Fish Audio for enabling voice in my app, generating museum explanations. I value the text-to-speech API and voice library, including community voices. It simplifies setup to an API key, but there are limitations like concurrent usage restrictions and uncertainty in commercial use of some voices. ### 44. Fast, High-Quality, Cost-Effective TTS That’s Easy to Implement **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Tristan G. | Owner, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 21, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** The speed, quality, and cost of fish audio has been great. I came from eleven labs and have had a much easier time implementing TTS in my chat bot. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** I can't think of much I dislike, but I'm not sure why I have a balance and credits. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** It's helping me give a unique voice to my AI chat bot. It's much faster than when I was using my own GPU and cheaper than eleven labs was. ### 45. Natural and Economical Audio, Perfect for Language Learning **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 23, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I like that Fish Audio solves everything related to text-to-speech and speech-to-text conversion, as well as cloning my voice. The quality is very natural and much better than others in the competition, like Eleven Labs. I also appreciate that, using a very small sample, the cloned voice sounds a lot like my real voice. It is more economical than iLevel Labs and I only needed a minute and a half of my voice to get results that sounded practically exactly like my real voice. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** I think it could improve when the text is multilingual. I've noticed that sometimes it doesn't detect the language well. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Fish Audio solves text-to-speech and vice versa conversion for me, and clones my voice with few examples, achieving an almost identical quality. It is more economical than Eleven Labs, and I don't need hours of recording or professional voices. ### 46. Exceptional Customization and Sound Quality with Fish Audio **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 21, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I was amazed at how great the custom voices sounded with Fish Audio. Some of the customization options were actually better than the other products I've used in the past. I like that Fish Audio lets me use custom voices for characters that aren't necessarily always human sounding, which is great. What I like most about Fish Audio is their whole product lineup. They're constantly making performance changes, creating a more reliable product, and giving more features while retaining legacy features so I don't lose previous configuration sets and quality. Their prices are decent too. Also, the initial setup was very easy, and it didn't take long at all for me to get my custom voices integrated with good results. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** I notice that sometimes my custom voices come with a default voice, which can be a bit of a hassle. I haven't used the newer models yet, so I'm hoping that gets resolved or is or was resolved. But honestly, that's the only problem I've encountered. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Fish Audio lets me use custom voices for unique character voices, which is great. ### 47. Fish Audio > Eleven Labs every day, every time! **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Eric P. | Director of Professional Services, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 22, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** The quality is off the charts, especially in context of cost. I used Eleven previously and while I do like their TTS a little more they were just too expensive. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** Hmm, not much that I can think of. The API is fast (I use web sockets) and you continue to improve the product at the same cost. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** I am building a highly personal AI-based assistant for my home automation and Fish gives it life. ### 48. Effortless Setup, Exceptional TTS Performance **Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Aaron B. | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** July 22, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** What I like most about Fish Audio is that it’s easy to work with, and the API documentation has been fantastic. It allows us to offer a fantastic service to our clients and customers. The integration is easy, and I appreciate that they kept our credits even as we've been users for over a year. The initial setup was super simple, with the documentation facilitating a quick start in a matter of minutes. It really stands out for me. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** Really the voices sometimes with V1 tend to be a little off. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** Fish Audio solves getting good, clean TTS to work, integrates easily, and works well for us and our clients. ### 49. Free endpoint is a big plus, but also the audio quality can be unpredictable and sussy **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Michael O. | Student, Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 05, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** Free endpoint because NOT everyone can afford it **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** Audio quality sometimes and the model goes "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" or other really sussy sounds like "ah ah ah", I can't imagine presenting the project to someone in my class and model goes mature... **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** For example in elevenlabs everything is pricy and here I can just prototype, I would be really happy if they extend the free endpoint trial. ### 50. Amazing speed and simplicity with improved dialects **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Salah A. | Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 01, 2026 **What do you like best about Fish Audio?** I love the speed, simplicity, and power in Fish Audio, especially the price which is very attractive. I also loved the quality of the English dubbing as it was excellent. The setup process was very easy as well. **What do you dislike about Fish Audio?** I find that there is an issue with accent leakage in voices. When I clone a non-Arabic voice and then use that clone with Arabic text, the Arabic text appears with a non-Arabic accent, such as a Korean man speaking Arabic with a Korean accent. Also, I would prefer if the monthly subscription could be integrated with the API as it is more in demand. **What problems is Fish Audio solving and how is that benefiting you?** I use Fish Audio for dubbing and editing games. I love the speed, simplicity, and power. The English dubbing is excellent and the price is good. But I have an issue with dialect leakage when using non-Arabic versions. - [View Fish Audio pricing details and edition comparison](https://www.g2.com/products/fish-audio/reviews?section=pricing&secure%5Bexpires_at%5D=2026-08-12+15%3A46%3A21+-0500&secure%5Bsession_id%5D=f2fe426c-2e62-4f7c-8d38-096683ed077d&secure%5Btoken%5D=78f4a9c48c5339854ced4200818359c802dbb2336ca7fd0ce78ba013f4fa8b22&format=llm_user) ## Fish Audio Integrations - [ChatGPT](https://www.g2.com/products/chatgpt/reviews) - [Claude Code](https://www.g2.com/products/anthropic-claude-code/reviews) - [Deepgram](https://www.g2.com/products/deepgram/reviews) - [Deepseek](https://www.g2.com/products/deepseek/reviews) - [FFmpeg](https://www.g2.com/products/ffmpeg/reviews) - [Gemini](https://www.g2.com/products/google-gemini/reviews) - [Google Vertex AI SDK](https://www.g2.com/products/google-vertex-ai-sdk/reviews) - [Hermes 3](https://www.g2.com/products/hermes-3/reviews) - [Home Assistant Voice](https://www.g2.com/products/home-assistant-voice/reviews) - [LiveKit](https://www.g2.com/products/livekit/reviews) - [LxRoot](https://www.g2.com/products/lxroot/reviews) - [Make](https://www.g2.com/products/integromat-by-celonis-make/reviews) - [n8n](https://www.g2.com/products/n8n/reviews) - [Nous Chat](https://www.g2.com/products/nous-chat/reviews) - [OpenAI SDK](https://www.g2.com/products/openai-sdk/reviews) - [OpenAI Whisper](https://www.g2.com/products/openai-whisper/reviews) - [OverWolf](https://www.g2.com/products/overwolf/reviews) - [Pipecat](https://www.g2.com/products/pipecat/reviews) - [Pipecat](https://www.g2.com/products/pipecat-pipecat/reviews) ## Fish Audio Features **Additional Functionality** - Tagging - Natural Language Processing - Data Extraction - Multi-Language - Predictive Analytics - Drag & Drop - Speech Recognition - Reporting/Analytics - Data Storage Management - Virtual Personal Assistant (VPA) - AI Copilot - Customer Segmentation - Collaboration Tools - Data Import/Export - Generative AI - For eCommerce - Role-Based Permissions - Customizable Branding - Search/Filter - Monitoring - Document Management - API - Data Visualization - Trend Analysis - Machine Learning - Access Controls/Permissions - Alerts/Escalation - Performance Metrics - Real-Time Data - Third-Party Integrations - Mobile App - Multiple Data Sources - For Sales Teams/Organizations - Sentiment Analysis - Activity Dashboard - Chatbot - Workflow Automation **Additional Functionality** - Code Generation - Text to Image - Generative AI - API - Natural Language Processing - Virtual Characters and Avatars - Content Generation - Personalization and Recommendation - Conditional Generation - Transformer Model - Automated Image & Video Editing - Interactive and Co-Creative Systems - Text Summarization - Data Augmentation - Variation Autoencoder Models - Adversarial Training - Transfer Learning and Fine-tuning - Simulation and Scenario Generation - Creative Design - AI Copilot - Prompt Engineering - Foundation Model **Integration** - Application Integration - Real-Time Streaming - Integration - Integration **Audio** - Accents - Voice Cloning - Range of Tones - Languages **Speech Output** - Volume - Pitch - Speed - Pronunciation - Accent - Emotion - Speaking Styles - Speech Output - Speech Output - Speech Output - Speech Output - Speech Output - Speech Output - Speech Output **Video** - Closed Captions - Avatar Quality - Custom Avatars - Video Editing Capabilities **Audio Format** - Natural Sounding Voices - Audio Format Flexibility - Audio Optimization - Audio Format - Custom Voices - Multi-Voice **Image** - Text to Image - Realism **Text** - Text Optimization - Range of Sentiments **Generative AI** - AI Text-to-Speech - Gen AI - Generative AI **Additional Functionality** - For Online Learning - Grammar Check - Audio Editor - For Sales Teams/Organizations - Analytics - WCAG Compliance - Content Library - Publishing/Sharing - Chatbot - Content Creation - Data Management - AI Copilot - Speech Recognition - Collaboration Tools - Text Analysis - Phonetic Variation Detection - Voice Generator - SSML Support - Transcripts/Chat History - For Marketers - Speech-to-Text Analysis - Project Management - Multi-Language - Machine Translation - Natural Language Processing - API **Platform** - Collaboration - Speed of Generation **Generative AI** - AI Text Generation - AI Text Summarization - AI Text-to-Image - AI Text-to-Speech - AI Image-to-Text - AI Text-to-Video - AI Text-to-3D - AI Text-to-Music ## Top Fish Audio Alternatives - [Synthesia](https://www.g2.com/products/synthesia/reviews) - 4.6/5.0 (2,769 reviews) - [VEED](https://www.g2.com/products/veed/reviews) - 4.6/5.0 (2,159 reviews) - [HeyGen](https://www.g2.com/products/heygen/reviews) - 4.8/5.0 (1,932 reviews)