Fingerprint helped us solve a very specific challenge: identifying AI agent traffic and making that data available in GA4. Before implementing it, we had no reliable way to distinguish AI-driven visits from regular traffic. By enriching and forwarding this information to our analytics stack, we gained visibility into a growing traffic source that would otherwise go unnoticed. The integration was easy to implement and quickly provided insights that we now use in reporting and analysis. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main limitation for us is that the identification capabilities are stronger than the reporting capabilities. Fingerprint provides the data we need, but we still rely on external tools such as GA4 to fully analyze and visualize AI agent traffic. More built-in reporting and monitoring features for AI-related use cases would add significant value. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Fingerprint stood out to us because of how quickly it could be integrated into our existing systems without creating operational friction. The onboarding process was straightforward, and the documentation made it easy for our engineering team to implement the solution efficiently. We were able to start analyzing device activity shortly after deployment, which helped accelerate our evaluation phase. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While the platform delivers strong device-level insights, it requires some internal configuration to fully align with specific business logic. The raw signals are highly useful, but organizations may need to define their own frameworks for interpreting and acting on them effectively. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Fingerprint has turned out to be a solid tool for us. To navigate the platform was straightforward, and identifying devices with accuracy has been nice (along with the integration into our process). In addition to providing device identification, the platform helps strengthen security and provide a more straightforward user experience by keeping things simple and efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The pricing structure can be a little overwhelming for a start-up or small business. A few advanced features may take some time to fully comprehend, but with the new documentation and customer support team available to assist with the process, it has certainly become more manageable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about Fingerprint is how easy and fast it was to integrate into our system. The implementation was straightforward, allowing us to get up and running very quickly.

Another key advantage is the quality and depth of the data it provides. Compared to other solutions we evaluated, Fingerprint offers a broader and more useful range of information, giving us valuable insights into our users and helping us strengthen our fraud prevention capabilities.

Even though we are still working on integrating additional aspects of the API, the results so far have been very satisfying. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At this stage, we don’t have any major concerns. As we are still in the process of integrating additional aspects of the API, some features are not fully implemented on our side yet, so we are still exploring the full potential of the solution.

In some cases, it would be helpful to have even more documentation or examples for advanced use cases, especially when working with more complex integrations.

That said, our overall experience so far has been very positive, and we expect to get even more value as we continue expanding the integration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about Fingerprint is the consistency of its device identification compared to basic fingerprinting approaches. In practice, it does a much better job keeping the same browser tied to the same identity over time, which reduces false positives and unnecessary step-up challenges. The added risk signals are also genuinely useful for fraud and account takeover detection. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike most is the cost at higher volumes and limited transparency into some of the underlying decision logic. It performs well, but parts of it can feel like a black box, which makes internal explainability and tuning harder for teams that want deeper control. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I used the fingerprint, so first the setup of the environment is simple and easy to use dashboard and navigation bar. Its developer SDK is very easy to integrate, and it presents in various language supports like JavaScript, React, and more. It has very low latency while we try to do API calls, even for high traffic applications, the response is quite fast. Its pricing plans are attractive, as it starts from free for exploring API & for basic identification. Fingerprint provides very good support with it's clear and precise documentation, which guides on step by step for complete process. It also has AI features, which help in improving device identification accuracy. It also detects if any suspicious or unwanted pattern is found in real time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

the only thing I dislike about the fingerprint is the pricing because it will become expensive when we do High number of API calls. so the pricing discount can be provided based on the API limit. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use Fingerprint to catch multi-accounting and linked accounts on our platform, which is a constant issue in online gaming/crypto environments where users try to create duplicate accounts to abuse bonuses or get around bans. It’s been solid for a few months now. The visitor IDs have been stable enough that we can reliably tie new signups back to previously flagged devices, even when someone changes IPs or clears cookies. Integration was straightforward, and it’s made our fraud review process much less manual since we’re no longer relying purely on IP or email matching. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing major so far, mostly minor gripes rather than real issues. Nothing that's gotten in the way of it doing its job. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Fingerprint tells us when someone is using a VPN, browsing in incognito mode, or when their browser has been tampered with. Those are signals we never would have been able to catch on our own, so we rely on the flags and act on them. The visitor ID stays consistent even when a candidate switches browsers, clears cookies, or signs up with a new email.

The best part is that we don’t have to configure anything. There are no rules to write, no lists to maintain, and no training required. We simply review what it reports about a candidate and take action, and it has been right almost every time.

Their web app is also straightforward to use. When I need to look up a single event, I paste the event ID into the dashboard and everything related to it like signals, device, browser, IP, and location appears together on one page. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Honestly, nothing specific comes to mind. We’ve been using it for a while now, and it’s just quietly done its job. It hasn’t crashed, it hasn’t unexpectedly changed its behavior on us, and on the few occasions we’ve had a question, the documentation was clear enough that we never needed to open a support ticket. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Fingerprint is how accurately it identifies returning users and devices, even when cookies are cleared or users switch browsers. The implementation was straightforward thanks to the well-documented SDKs and APIs, and the response times have been consistently fast. It has significantly reduced duplicate accounts, fraud attempts, and manual verification work. The dashboard is easy to navigate, and the detailed device intelligence helps us make better risk decisions without impacting the user experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Overall, the product works very well, but the pricing can become expensive as usage scales. It would also be helpful to have more built-in analytics, reporting options, and customizable dashboards. Some advanced features have a learning curve for new users, although the documentation is comprehensive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Fingerprint to detect high risk and bot suspicious users. It makes it really simple to get all the data I need related to a user and their profile and device. It simplifies the integration complexity and adds a ton of value with its unique fingerprint feature for detecting high risk activities. The SDK was really easy to integrate into React Native and works great for iOS and Android. It provides a significant amount of rich data about the user and their device, and I'm able to use the data and signals it generates to integrate into workflows to detect high risk activity and mitigate risk. I continue to use Fingerprint because it offers rich high signal data when I need it. The initial setup was really easy, and I was able to integrate it within two days. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

N/A Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.