Reduce your software costs by 18% overnight
CircleCI

CircleCI Alternatives & Competitors

(384)4.4 out of 5

Looking for alternatives to CircleCI? Tons of people want Continuous Integration Tools to help with test customization. What's difficult is finding out whether or not the software you choose is right for you. We have compiled a list of Continuous Integration Tools that reviewers voted best overall compared to CircleCI. Based on reviewer data you can see how CircleCI stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users, and find the best fit for your business. Jenkins, CloudBees CodeShip, Bitrise, and GitLab are the most popular alternatives and competitors to CircleCI.

Top Alternatives to CircleCI

  • Jenkins
  • CloudBees CodeShip
  • Bitrise
  • GitLab
  • CloudBees CI

Top 20 Alternatives & Competitors to CircleCI

    #1
    #1
  1. Jenkins

    (298)4.3 out of 5

    Jenkins is an application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  2. Jenkins is an application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    AI
    Jenkins is tested, well-known system with a decent ecosystem of plugins and support.
    #2
    #2
  3. CloudBees CodeShip

    (159)4.3 out of 5
    Optimized for quick response

    Codeship offers hosted continuous integration and deployment for your web apps, including rails, php, python, java or go apps.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  4. Codeship offers hosted continuous integration and deployment for your web apps, including rails, php, python, java or go apps.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    ER
    Dead easy, especially compared to circleci or jenkins. It was super simple to make it work and just works. It's free to get started and seems easy to get off, so low risk to evaluate.

    Reviewers say compared to CircleCI, CloudBees CodeShip is:

    Easier to admin
    Better at support
    Easier to set up
    18%   of software applications aren't well liked by teams using them.
    Find out how your team feels about your stack with G2 Pulse Surveys.
    Learn More
    #3
    #3
  5. Bitrise

    (147)4.9 out of 5
    Optimized for quick response

    Bring back the joy of app development! Mobile Continuous Integration & Delivery for your whole team, with dozens of integrations for your favorite services.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  6. Bring back the joy of app development! Mobile Continuous Integration & Delivery for your whole team, with dozens of integrations for your favorite services.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    Afonso G.
    AG
    Bitrise is basically plug and play if you want it to be like that. Bitrise builds a lot of the plugins, and at the same time there is a great community in place that produces their own...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to CircleCI, Bitrise is:

    Better at support
    Easier to do business with
    Easier to admin
    #4
    #4
  7. GitLab

    (290)4.4 out of 5

    An open source web interface and source control platform based on Git.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  8. An open source web interface and source control platform based on Git.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    YA
    Relatively similar to multiple other code repository hosting websites. Many of the same features of being able to have multiple repositories and create merge requests. Relatively easy to comment on...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to CircleCI, GitLab is:

    Easier to admin
    Better at support
    Better at meeting requirements
    #5
    #5
  9. CloudBees CI

    (248)4.2 out of 5
    Optimized for quick response

    CloudBees provides solutions that enable DevOps teams to respond rapidly to the software delivery needs of the business.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  10. CloudBees provides solutions that enable DevOps teams to respond rapidly to the software delivery needs of the business.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    MS
    Shared libraries, that allow us to create one Pipeline that is used by multiple projects of the same type. Our previous engine didn't allow this and when we needed to introduce a change to the...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to CircleCI, CloudBees CI is:

    Slower to reach roi
    More expensive
    Better at support
    #6
    #6
  11. Microsoft Team Foundation Server

    (136)4.1 out of 5

    An enterprise-grade server for teams to share code, track work, and ship software — for any language, all in a single package. It’s the perfect complement to your IDE.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  12. An enterprise-grade server for teams to share code, track work, and ship software — for any language, all in a single package. It’s the perfect complement to your IDE.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    Muhammad Hassan K.
    MK
    Just few simple steps and you are done with creating the Site collections and assigning the users their roles and responsibilities. The best part one can check is the share point integration with...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to CircleCI, Microsoft Team Foundation Server is:

    More expensive
    #7
    #7
  13. Semaphore

    (127)4.7 out of 5

    Semaphore is a hosted continuous integration and deployment service for open source and private projects.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  14. Semaphore is a hosted continuous integration and deployment service for open source and private projects.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    JS
    Semaphore 1 was crazily easy to use. Even though Semaphore 2 gives me much more flexility (which I want) I sometimes miss this simplicity. But compared to CircleCi for example the defaults are...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to CircleCI, Semaphore is:

    Better at support
    Easier to do business with
    Easier to set up
    #8
    #8
  15. Buddy

    (105)4.6 out of 5

    Code, build and deploy with no effort

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  16. Code, build and deploy with no effort

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    Karl M.
    KM
    The pipeline building user interface is great. It's really intuitive and means I won't have to wrestle any more YAML pipline configurations

    Reviewers say compared to CircleCI, Buddy is:

    Slower to reach roi
    More usable
    Easier to admin
    #9
    #9
  17. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

    (100)4.5 out of 5

    Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a simple way to automate apps and infrastructure. Application Deployment + Configuration Management + Continuous Delivery.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  18. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a simple way to automate apps and infrastructure. Application Deployment + Configuration Management + Continuous Delivery.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    Jagadish prasad P.
    JP
    the best part I like about ansible is that it is very easy to use. internal SSH connection does not let us worry about connectivity . I have used ansible to deploy scripts and retrieving logs from...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to CircleCI, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is:

    Easier to admin
    Easier to set up
    More usable
    #10
    #10
  19. Travis CI

    (80)4.6 out of 5

    Test and Deploy with Confidence. Easily sync your GitHub projects with Travis CI and you'll be testing your code in minutes!

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  20. Test and Deploy with Confidence. Easily sync your GitHub projects with Travis CI and you'll be testing your code in minutes!

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    Jim Ryan Z.
    JZ
    Travis has been a very good experience to me compared to using other CI. We went from CircleCI to this because of it's simplicity, the config is very easy and the documentation is really good for...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to CircleCI, Travis CI is:

    Easier to admin
    Easier to set up
    Easier to do business with
    #11
    #11
  21. TeamCity

    (63)4.3 out of 5

    One reason TeamCity is dubbed an "Intelligent CI server" is its approach to integration. When we say we support a tool, we mean it in every way possible. For example, support for Visual Studio projects provides automatic detection of tool versions, testing frameworks support, code coverage, static code analysis, and more.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  22. One reason TeamCity is dubbed an "Intelligent CI server" is its approach to integration. When we say we support a tool, we mean it in every way possible. For example, support for Visual Studio projects provides automatic detection of tool versions, testing frameworks support, code coverage, static code analysis, and more.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    AC
    Stages and steps of Teamcity are simplified Intergration with other tools are easy .

    Reviewers say compared to CircleCI, TeamCity is:

    Better at support
    Better at meeting requirements
    #12
    #12
  23. Bamboo

    (53)4.1 out of 5

    Bamboo does more than just run builds and tests. It connects issues, commits, test results, and deploys so the whole picture is available to your entire product team- from project managers, to devs and testers, to sys admins.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  24. Bamboo does more than just run builds and tests. It connects issues, commits, test results, and deploys so the whole picture is available to your entire product team- from project managers, to devs and testers, to sys admins.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    US
    Has all of my details such as vacation and sick days remaining and what I have used. Lets me see which team members are working or taking off.

    Reviewers say compared to CircleCI, Bamboo is:

    Easier to admin
    More expensive
    #13
    #13
  25. Octopus Deploy

    (40)4.3 out of 5

    Octopus works with your build server to enable reliable, secure, automated releases of ASP.NET applications and Windows Services into test, staging and production environments, whether they are in the cloud or on-premises.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  26. Octopus works with your build server to enable reliable, secure, automated releases of ASP.NET applications and Windows Services into test, staging and production environments, whether they are in the cloud or on-premises.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    AL
    The possibility to install complex solutions, even in various environments and different operating system in basically one click. In fact, after the machines and variables configuration, your...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to CircleCI, Octopus Deploy is:

    More expensive
    Slower to reach roi
    Better at meeting requirements
    #14
    #14
  27. AWS CodePipeline

    (30)4.0 out of 5

    AWS CodePipeline is a continuous integration and continuous delivery service for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  28. AWS CodePipeline is a continuous integration and continuous delivery service for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    UI
    I think that this is easy to get started with, and the interface is getting better and better.

    Reviewers say compared to CircleCI, AWS CodePipeline is:

    Better at support
    Easier to do business with
    #15
    #15
  29. AppVeyor

    (23)4.4 out of 5

    Continuous Integration and Deployment service for busy Windows developers

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  30. Continuous Integration and Deployment service for busy Windows developers

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    Michael Ira K.
    MK
    ability to build my linux applications under windows using cygwin or msys

    Reviewers say compared to CircleCI, AppVeyor is:

    Easier to admin
    Easier to do business with
    Better at support
    #16
    #16
  31. Spinnaker

    (15)4.2 out of 5

    Spinnaker helps codify the process of reliably deploying artifacts to the cloud, leveraging industry best practices out-of-the-box.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  32. Spinnaker helps codify the process of reliably deploying artifacts to the cloud, leveraging industry best practices out-of-the-box.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    UI
    It supports incremental deployments and supports “green/blue” deployments which are crucial in Agile methodology. Due to cloud deployments, it is easy to manage and configure deployment...Read more
    #17
    #17
  33. GoCD

    (14)4.0 out of 5

    Go's OSS distribution uses an embedded database. That's great for getting started. But, if you need to scale beyond a few teams and several pipelines, our PostgreSQL plugin gives you the performance upgrade necessary for hundreds of pipelines and agents.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  34. Go's OSS distribution uses an embedded database. That's great for getting started. But, if you need to scale beyond a few teams and several pipelines, our PostgreSQL plugin gives you the performance upgrade necessary for hundreds of pipelines and agents.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    Bence N.
    BN
    The clear overview of pipelines and their status on the web UI is the main reason we like Go CD. The materials, artifacts, and pipelines/jobs/tasks architecture is a very logical way to map a CD...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to CircleCI, GoCD is:

    Easier to do business with
    #18
    #18
  35. Codefresh

    (32)4.8 out of 5

    Codefresh manages your complete build, test and deploy pipeline with native support for integration tests

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  36. Codefresh manages your complete build, test and deploy pipeline with native support for integration tests

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    Alexandros P.
    AP
    You can implement pretty much anything you can think of, by using custom steps. Steps allow us to modularize our existing pipelines, making it an almost "plug and play" model. Their support team is...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to CircleCI, Codefresh is:

    Easier to admin
    More usable
    Better at meeting requirements
    #19
    #19
  37. Copado

    (190)4.2 out of 5
    Optimized for quick response

    Copado Apps for deployment, testing & backup for salesforce to increase your productivity working from everywhere you want and with any device you use

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  38. Copado Apps for deployment, testing & backup for salesforce to increase your productivity working from everywhere you want and with any device you use

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    Will N.
    WN
    Copado has been super helpful with the ease of setting up deployment pipelines and managing deployments at a user story level. Our consultants can commit changes to the repository through the...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to CircleCI, Copado is:

    Slower to reach roi
    More expensive
    Easier to admin
    #20
    #20
  39. Chef

    (40)4.0 out of 5

    Chef turns infrastructure into code. With Chef, you can automate how you build, deploy, and manage your infrastructure. Your infrastructure becomes as versionable, testable, and repeatable as application code.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:
  40. Chef turns infrastructure into code. With Chef, you can automate how you build, deploy, and manage your infrastructure. Your infrastructure becomes as versionable, testable, and repeatable as application code.

    Categories in common with CircleCI:

    AN
    - Great centralized features: data bags (central data storage), encrypted data bags, restricting script (cookbook) version on given nodes...etc. - Amazing ruby-based syntax. This what makes Chef...Read more

    Reviewers say compared to CircleCI, Chef is:

    Slower to reach roi