What do you dislike about Batipi?
Batipi lacks robust folder organization for grouping large collections of mock endpoints, making it hard to navigate projects with many mocks. It also has limited built-in authentication options for complex security test scenarios, so I still have to use other tools to simulate OAuth flows. These gaps create extra manual work for our more sophisticated integration testing tasks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Recommendations to others considering Batipi:
To enhance Batipi's usability, consider implementing a more robust folder organization system for better management of mock endpoints. Additionally, expanding built-in authentication options would greatly benefit users dealing with complex security scenarios. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What problems is Batipi solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Batipi to create temporary mock endpoints and run API validation tests. It removes local dependencies, provides cloud-hosted endpoints, and allows instant adjustments to response bodies, reducing delays during integration tests and improving communication between teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.