I mainly use Batipi for secure video meetings and client consultations in cybersecurity. What I appreciate most about Batipi is its strong built-in security and GDPR compliance, which is non-negotiable for our cybersecurity work in Germany. The platform is stable and straightforward, with consistent audio, reliable screen sharing, and simple session recording. I don’t have to worry about data leaks or compliance risks during confidential client calls, and the whole team can start secure meetings quickly without a steep learning curve. The initial setup of Batipi was really straightforward and hassle‑free. We created an account, adjusted basic security and GDPR settings, and hosted our first secure meeting in under 10 minutes with no complex technical steps. The dashboard is intuitive, so our team didn’t require special training or IT support to get started. For a security-focused team, this balance of usability and strict data protection makes Batipi really stand out. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
First, the user and access permission system is too basic. We need more granular controls for sensitive calls—such as restricting screen sharing only to hosts, disabling recording for guests, setting time-limited access for external participants, and creating role-based permissions. Stronger audit logs for tracking who joined, presented, or downloaded content would also help with compliance. Right now, Batipi’s permissions are too general. We need role-based, meeting-specific access rules: for example, blocking all screen sharing for external guests by default, only allowing designated staff to start recordings, and setting one-time or time-limited access codes for third-party partners. This would prevent accidental data exposure during high-risk discussions about vulnerabilities or client infrastructure. During incident-response calls, we could quickly lock down meetings without manually adjusting settings each time, making workflows faster and more secure. As for audit logs, the current version lacks detail. We need logs that track every critical action: who joined and when, who shared their screen, who accessed or downloaded recordings, and who modified meeting settings. These detailed logs are essential for GDPR accountability and internal security audits. Instead of manually documenting meeting activity, we could generate compliant reports instantly, saving time and reducing human error. Additional improvements would include better integration with our security ticketing and cloud storage systems, so recordings and notes sync automatically, and more stable mobile performance for on‑call incident response. These changes would make Batipi not just a meeting tool, but a fully compliant, efficient part of our security operations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
