Aurelia Reviews & Product Details

Aurelia provides two way data binding, it also provide routing and UI composition. It support broad languages and it is testable. It is easy to use and easy to implement. It provide good customer care support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Aurelia didn't have much flexibility to support complex requirements and less code reuseability. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The compactness of the library and thus its speed are noteworthy. It has a large and active community. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The learning curve can be a little steep and there are many version changes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I was pleased by Aurelia's uncomplicated approach, potent performance, and focus on modularity. Aurelia is unquestionably something to take into consideration if you're seeking for a contemporary front-end framework that manages to blend simplicity and functionality. Aurelia has the ability to speed up your development process and provide a superior user experience whether you're creating a small project or a large-scale application. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Even though Aurelia is a competent and well-designed JavaScript front-end framework, some developers have identified a few areas where they believe competing frameworks perform better than Aurelia:

Adoption and appeal: The fact that Aurelia is less well-known and used than frameworks like React, Angular, or Vue.js is one of the least advantageous elements of it. There may be less resources, community contributions, and third-party integrations accessible due to the smaller user population. Finding comprehensive help or ready-made solutions for particular problems may prove difficult for developers.

Limited Developer Pool: Due to its lower adoption rate, some businesses or projects may have trouble locating developers with specific Aurelia knowledge. This constraint may make it difficult to assemble a team that is familiar with the framework or to hire such a team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy to use and implement. Well-maintained and easy-to-understand documentation Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Have not found anything to dislike yet as I was just studying this. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is easy to create new components and debug as Aurelia architecture follows a straightforward project structure. Also, I especially love the way that Aurelia works when it comes to event pub/sub design patterns. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Even though Aurelia is a well-matured framework for SPA applications. One point that could be improved is end-to-end testing automation supporting components and documentation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Because of well-maintained documentation and the simplicity of the core features, it is effortless to learn. And of course, the performance is exceptional Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Better if we can have more community members to help/resolve issues Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

New components and easy to understand framework Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some major features missing or restrictive in terms of using external libraries Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Reactive binding takes care of all the data bindings in real time without any additional code needed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Little documentation and resources are available compared to other giant libraries out there. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Convention over configuration and clean htnl and well documented Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Has a smal community and not very well known Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Lightweight and fresh, Aurelia does things better than the competitors. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Lack of examples and implementation demos Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.