# Top 10 Apache Buildr Alternatives & Competitors
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Number of Reviews:** 13
The Other Continuous Delivery Software solutions below are the most common alternatives that users and reviewers compare with Apache Buildr. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to Apache Buildr include tasks and projects. The best overall Apache Buildr alternative is GNU Make. Other similar apps like Apache Buildr are CMake, SCons, FinalBuilder, and GNU Automake. Apache Buildr alternatives can be found in [Other Continuous Delivery Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery).


## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to Apache Buildr
  - [GNU Make](https://www.g2.com/products/gnu-make/reviews)
  - [CMake](https://www.g2.com/products/cmake/reviews)
  - [SCons](https://www.g2.com/products/scons/reviews)
  - [FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/products/finalbuilder/reviews)
  - [GNU Automake](https://www.g2.com/products/gnu-automake/reviews)
  - [Distcc](https://www.g2.com/products/distcc/reviews)
  - [A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/products/a-a-p/reviews)
  - [Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/products/google-cloud-tekton/reviews)
  - [Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/products/rocket-enterprise-server/reviews)
  - [Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/products/leiningen/reviews)

## Top 10 Alternatives to Apache Buildr Recently Reviewed By G2 Community
Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how Apache Buildr stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Computer Software, Information Technology and Services, and Staffing and Recruiting, and find the best product for your business.


  ### 1. [GNU Make](https://www.g2.com/products/gnu-make/reviews)
By FreeCAD
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 19
Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.


Reviewers say compared to Apache Buildr, GNU Make is:
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with Apache Buildr: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [Apache Buildr vs GNU Make](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-gnu-make)
**Compare GNU Make with other alternatives:**
- [GNU Make vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-gnu-make)
- [GNU Make vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-make-vs-scons)
- [GNU Make vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-gnu-make)
- [GNU Make vs GNU Automake](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-automake-vs-gnu-make)
- [GNU Make vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-gnu-make)
- [GNU Make vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-gnu-make)
- [GNU Make vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-make-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [GNU Make vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-make-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [GNU Make vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-make-vs-leiningen)

  ### 2. [CMake](https://www.g2.com/products/cmake/reviews)
By Kitware
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 17
CMake is a family of tools designed to build, test and package software. CMake is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files. CMake generates native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of your choice.


Categories in common with Apache Buildr: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [Apache Buildr vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-cmake)
**Compare CMake with other alternatives:**
- [CMake vs GNU Make](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-gnu-make)
- [CMake vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-scons)
- [CMake vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-finalbuilder)
- [CMake vs GNU Automake](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-gnu-automake)
- [CMake vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-distcc)
- [CMake vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-cmake)
- [CMake vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [CMake vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [CMake vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-leiningen)

  ### 3. [SCons](https://www.g2.com/products/scons/reviews)
By SCons Foundation
**Average Rating:** 4.1/5
**Total Reviews:** 17
SCons is an Open Source software construction tool-that is, a next-generation build tool.


Categories in common with Apache Buildr: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [Apache Buildr vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-scons)
**Compare SCons with other alternatives:**
- [SCons vs GNU Make](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-make-vs-scons)
- [SCons vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-scons)
- [SCons vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-scons)
- [SCons vs GNU Automake](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-automake-vs-scons)
- [SCons vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-scons)
- [SCons vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-scons)
- [SCons vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/google-cloud-tekton-vs-scons)
- [SCons vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/rocket-enterprise-server-vs-scons)
- [SCons vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/leiningen-vs-scons)

  ### 4. [FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/products/finalbuilder/reviews)
By VSoft Technologies
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 13
Automating your Build process is simple with FinalBuilder. With FinalBuilder you don't need to edit xml, or write scripts. Visually define and debug your build scripts, then schedule them with windows scheduler, or integrate them with Continua CI, Jenkins or any other CI Server.


Reviewers say compared to Apache Buildr, FinalBuilder is:
- Better at meeting requirements
- Better at support
Categories in common with Apache Buildr: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [Apache Buildr vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-finalbuilder)
**Compare FinalBuilder with other alternatives:**
- [FinalBuilder vs GNU Make](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-gnu-make)
- [FinalBuilder vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-finalbuilder)
- [FinalBuilder vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-scons)
- [FinalBuilder vs GNU Automake](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-gnu-automake)
- [FinalBuilder vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-finalbuilder)
- [FinalBuilder vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-finalbuilder)
- [FinalBuilder vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [FinalBuilder vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [FinalBuilder vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-leiningen)

  ### 5. [GNU Automake](https://www.g2.com/products/gnu-automake/reviews)
By FreeCAD
**Average Rating:** 4.2/5
**Total Reviews:** 11
GNU is an operating system that is free software-that is, it respects users' freedom. The development of GNU made it possible to use a computer without software that would trample your freedom.


Categories in common with Apache Buildr: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [Apache Buildr vs GNU Automake](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-gnu-automake)
**Compare GNU Automake with other alternatives:**
- [GNU Automake vs GNU Make](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-automake-vs-gnu-make)
- [GNU Automake vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-gnu-automake)
- [GNU Automake vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-automake-vs-scons)
- [GNU Automake vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-gnu-automake)
- [GNU Automake vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-gnu-automake)
- [GNU Automake vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-gnu-automake)
- [GNU Automake vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-automake-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [GNU Automake vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-automake-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [GNU Automake vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-automake-vs-leiningen)

  ### 6. [Distcc](https://www.g2.com/products/distcc/reviews)
By Distcc
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 11
distcc is a program to distribute builds of C, C++, Objective C or Objective C++ code across several machines on a network. distcc should always generate the same results as a local build, is simple to install and use, and is usually much faster than a local compile.


Reviewers say compared to Apache Buildr, Distcc is:
- More usable
Categories in common with Apache Buildr: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [Apache Buildr vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-distcc)
**Compare Distcc with other alternatives:**
- [Distcc vs GNU Make](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-gnu-make)
- [Distcc vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-distcc)
- [Distcc vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-scons)
- [Distcc vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-finalbuilder)
- [Distcc vs GNU Automake](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-gnu-automake)
- [Distcc vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-distcc)
- [Distcc vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [Distcc vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Distcc vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-leiningen)

  ### 7. [A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/products/a-a-p/reviews)
By NLnet Foundation
**Average Rating:** 4.2/5
**Total Reviews:** 9
A-A-P makes it easy to locate, download, build and install software. It also supports browsing source code, developing programs, managing different versions and distribution of software and documentation. This means that A-A-P is useful both for users and for developers.


Categories in common with Apache Buildr: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [Apache Buildr vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-apache-buildr)
**Compare A-A-P with other alternatives:**
- [A-A-P vs GNU Make](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-gnu-make)
- [A-A-P vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-cmake)
- [A-A-P vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-scons)
- [A-A-P vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-finalbuilder)
- [A-A-P vs GNU Automake](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-gnu-automake)
- [A-A-P vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-distcc)
- [A-A-P vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [A-A-P vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [A-A-P vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-leiningen)

  ### 8. [Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/products/google-cloud-tekton/reviews)
By Google
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 8
Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.


Reviewers say compared to Apache Buildr, Google Cloud Tekton is:
- Better at support
Categories in common with Apache Buildr: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [Apache Buildr vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
**Compare Google Cloud Tekton with other alternatives:**
- [Google Cloud Tekton vs GNU Make](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-make-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [Google Cloud Tekton vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [Google Cloud Tekton vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/google-cloud-tekton-vs-scons)
- [Google Cloud Tekton vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [Google Cloud Tekton vs GNU Automake](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-automake-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [Google Cloud Tekton vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [Google Cloud Tekton vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-google-cloud-tekton)
- [Google Cloud Tekton vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/google-cloud-tekton-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Google Cloud Tekton vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/google-cloud-tekton-vs-leiningen)

  ### 9. [Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/products/rocket-enterprise-server/reviews)
By Rocket Software
**Average Rating:** 4.7/5
**Total Reviews:** 5
Micro Focus Enterprise Server provides an application deployment environment for rehosting IBM mainframe applications that have traditionally run on IBM z/OS environments.


Categories in common with Apache Buildr: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [Apache Buildr vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
**Compare Rocket Enterprise Server with other alternatives:**
- [Rocket Enterprise Server vs GNU Make](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-make-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Rocket Enterprise Server vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Rocket Enterprise Server vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/rocket-enterprise-server-vs-scons)
- [Rocket Enterprise Server vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Rocket Enterprise Server vs GNU Automake](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-automake-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Rocket Enterprise Server vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Rocket Enterprise Server vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Rocket Enterprise Server vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/google-cloud-tekton-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)
- [Rocket Enterprise Server vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/leiningen-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)

  ### 10. [Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/products/leiningen/reviews)
By Leiningen
**Average Rating:** 4.8/5
**Total Reviews:** 3
Leiningen is the easiest way to use Clojure. With a focus on project automation and declarative configuration, it gets out of your way and lets you focus on your code.


Categories in common with Apache Buildr: [Other Continuous Delivery](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-continuous-delivery)

**Compare:** [Apache Buildr vs Leiningen](https://www.g2.com/compare/apache-buildr-vs-leiningen)
**Compare Leiningen with other alternatives:**
- [Leiningen vs GNU Make](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-make-vs-leiningen)
- [Leiningen vs CMake](https://www.g2.com/compare/cmake-vs-leiningen)
- [Leiningen vs SCons](https://www.g2.com/compare/leiningen-vs-scons)
- [Leiningen vs FinalBuilder](https://www.g2.com/compare/finalbuilder-vs-leiningen)
- [Leiningen vs GNU Automake](https://www.g2.com/compare/gnu-automake-vs-leiningen)
- [Leiningen vs Distcc](https://www.g2.com/compare/distcc-vs-leiningen)
- [Leiningen vs A-A-P](https://www.g2.com/compare/a-a-p-vs-leiningen)
- [Leiningen vs Google Cloud Tekton](https://www.g2.com/compare/google-cloud-tekton-vs-leiningen)
- [Leiningen vs Rocket Enterprise Server](https://www.g2.com/compare/leiningen-vs-rocket-enterprise-server)


## Explore Articles
- [Which CLM platforms hold up well when legal teams are managing high-volume contract workflows without the system slowing down or losing data integrity?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-clm-platforms-hold-up-well-when-legal-teams-are-managing-high-volume-contract-workflows-without-the-system-slowing-down-or-losing-data-integrity)
- [Best account-based orchestration software for SMBs](https://www.g2.com/discussions/best-account-based-orchestration-tools-for-smbs-what-s-your-go-to)
- [Best analytics platform for startup data needs](https://www.g2.com/discussions/best-analytics-platform-for-startup-data-needs)
- [What are the most stable C/C++ integrated development environments based on reviews from embedded systems and automotive engineers?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-most-stable-c-c-integrated-development-environments-based-on-reviews-from-embedded-systems-and-automotive-engineers)
- [What platform integrates CMS capabilities with marketing automation tools?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-platform-integrates-cms-capabilities-with-marketing-automation-tools)
- [MAX by AppLovin vs Unity Ads vs ironSource for a small mobile game: which app monetization platform pays out better for indie developers?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/max-by-applovin-vs-unity-ads-vs-ironsource-for-a-small-mobile-game-which-app-monetization-platform-pays-out-better-for-indie-developers)

## Spotlight Categories
- [Application Performance Monitoring (APM) Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/application-performance-monitoring-apm)
- [Help Desk Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/help-desk)
- [Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS)](https://www.g2.com/categories/applicant-tracking-systems-ats)