# Which video conferencing platforms deliver a smooth workflow at low cost without outside consulting?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For anyone reviewing from a lean-team seat: I've been trying to pin down which video conferencing platforms deliver a streamlined workflow at low cost without outside consulting, meaning easy setup a non-IT person finishes in an afternoon. The<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/video-conferencing"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/video-conferencing">Video Conferencing</a> category splits cleanly on this: four big platforms all make that claim, with different fine print:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/google-workspace/reviews"><strong>Google Workspace</strong></a>: Google Meet runs in the browser with a free tier for basic calls, and for teams already paying for Workspace, video is effectively included, no consulting required to reach a working setup.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/zoom-workplace/reviews"><strong>Zoom Workplace</strong></a>: the free plan covers real meetings and paid tiers are self-serve; the streamlined part is that everyone outside your company already knows how to join a Zoom call.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-teams/reviews"><strong>Microsoft Teams</strong></a>: effectively included where Microsoft 365 already exists, so low cost means no new line item, and the workflow is genuinely easy if your team lives in Microsoft apps all day.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-webex-suite/reviews"><strong>Webex Suite</strong></a>: a free plan plus self-serve paid tiers; the enterprise-grade depth is there if you grow into it, but nothing about the basic setup requires it.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For the teams that did this without outside help: did you actually reach a working setup on your own, and what was the one moment you nearly called a consultant?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">And are there any (from or outside of these four) overrated for a lean team or quietly underrated?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;I think the underrated test is inviting someone outside your company. Google Meet and Zoom usually make that painless, but Teams can feel different once guests are in the mix. For a lean team, I’d test joining, screen sharing, and recording with external users before worrying about advanced admin features.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4


