# Which Salesforce document generation tools work best for a sales team that needs e-signatures built in so quotes and contracts close without leaving Salesforce?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I've been researching which <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/salesforce-crm-document-generation">Salesforce document generation</a> tools keep e-signatures built in, so a sales team can close quotes and contracts without leaving the platform. It comes down to how native you want to stay: S-Docs, GetAccept, and DealHub are the three I'd shortlist, with S-Docs the most Salesforce-native and GetAccept and DealHub wrapping more of a buyer-facing sales experience around signing.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What stands out about each:</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/s-docs/reviews"><strong>S-Docs</strong></a> (4.7 stars, 128 reviews): Fully native, so signing happens right on the platform and the Salesforce record updates the second a document is signed.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/getaccept/reviews"><strong>GetAccept</strong></a> (4.6 stars, 1,264 reviews): A digital sales room with e-signing built in, so reps can quote, send, and get signatures without leaving the opportunity.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/dealhub/reviews"><strong>DealHub</strong></a> (4.7 stars, 848 reviews): CPQ quoting plus built-in e-signature, and the signed agreement can flip the opportunity to Closed Won on its own.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/conga-composer/reviews"><strong>Conga Composer</strong></a> (4.4 stars, 907 reviews): Great native doc generation, but signing runs through Conga Sign or Docusign, and template setup usually needs an admin.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/docusign-gen/reviews"><strong>Docusign Gen</strong></a> (4.5 stars, 22 reviews): Pulls Salesforce data into Docusign eSignature, though the review base is small, so I'd check the fit first.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">If staying fully inside Salesforce is the priority, S-Docs is probably the closest fit, though I'd like to hear from anyone who's run this day to day. Did keeping the whole quote-to-signature flow in the CRM really cut the back-and-forth, or did gaps show up once deals got bigger?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 3 months ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Conga Composer and Docusign CLM both handle document generation with e-signature natively tied into Salesforce, so quotes and contracts can close without leaving the CRM.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 17 days ago



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Whatever share of your deals get edited, decide now where the negotiated version lives. Two years of contracts sitting in individual reps&#39; email is the real exposure, not the signing step.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 17 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;The gap that shows up on bigger deals isn&#39;t signature, it&#39;s redlines. A standard deal signs as sent, which is exactly the flow these handle beautifully, and S-Docs updating the record the second something is signed is genuinely satisfying to watch. A large deal comes back from the other side&#39;s counsel with tracked changes in Word, goes through two or three rounds outside the system, and returns as a version that no longer matches the template that generated it. That round-trip is the part a CRM-native flow doesn&#39;t own, so the useful question is what share of your deals get edited rather than just signed. If it&#39;s small, staying fully native is a clean win. If it&#39;s most of your large ones, the thing to work out is where the negotiated version lives and how it gets back onto the opportunity.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 17 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant



### Comment 4

&lt;p&gt;Yes, for most deals, keeping everything in one place cuts the back-and-forth significantly. Where it gets tricky is on bigger, more complex deals that involve legal edits or multiple signers, and that&#39;s usually where teams outgrow doc gen alone.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 months ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4