# Which Sage channel partners are best reviewed for financial management ERP implementations in the nonprofit or professional services sectors?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Nonprofit financial management has its own vocabulary, grant tracking, donor management, and fund accounting, which a generalist <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/sage-channel-partners">Sage channel partner</a> doesn't always speak fluently.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/jmt-consulting/reviews"><strong>JMT Consulting</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Works exclusively with nonprofits since 1991, with grant and donor management named specifically as a core service, the clearest specialist fit here.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/baker-tilly-baker-tilly/reviews"><strong>Baker Tilly</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Its broader advisory, tax, and assurance background covers nonprofit and professional services clients as part of a much wider practice.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ethosystems/reviews"><strong>ETHOSystems</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Specializes specifically in construction and real estate, a different vertical than nonprofit or professional services, worth knowing before assuming fit.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/blytheco/reviews"><strong>Blytheco</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Manufacturing, distribution, construction, and financial services are its named specializations, none of which map directly onto nonprofit work.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/alta-vista-technology/reviews"><strong>Alta Vista Technology</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Positioned broadly around Sage Intacct and Microsoft Dynamics rather than a specific vertical, a generalist option relative to JMT's nonprofit focus.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For nonprofit finance teams that went with a generalist partner anyway, did the lack of sector-specific experience actually cause real problems during implementation?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 6 days ago
- Author title: Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Something this doesn&#39;t touch on is what happens to historical donor and grant data during migration itself. Has anyone found that a partner without nonprofit-specific experience still handled that data cleanly, or did fund accounting history end up needing extra cleanup regardless of who ran the implementation?&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 4 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4