# Which RMM software has the best patch management coverage, with the fewest gaps in supported software?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Which RMM software has the best patch management coverage, with the fewest gaps in supported software is one of the more practical questions in the RMM space, since a tool that misses a patch for some third-party app is often worse than no automation at all. NinjaOne, N-able N-central, and Datto RMM top this list.</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ninjaone/reviews"><strong>NinjaOne</strong></a>: covers a wide range of third-party applications beyond just OS-level patching.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/n-able-n-central/reviews"><strong>N-able N-central</strong></a>: known for granular patch policies that let admins control rollout timing without leaving gaps.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/datto-rmm/reviews"><strong>Datto RMM</strong></a>: handles both Windows and third-party patching with reporting that flags what's still outstanding.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/kaseya-vsa/reviews"><strong>Kaseya VSA</strong></a>: broad patch catalog, though some MSPs note it takes more tuning to avoid noise.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/n-able-n-sight-rmm/reviews"><strong>N-able N-Sight RMM</strong></a>: solid coverage for smaller endpoint fleets without the overhead of the larger N-central platform.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Has a patch gap in your RMM ever caused a real problem, and did it change which tool you use?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 4 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;RMM reviews on G2 treat patch coverage as table stakes, which makes the actual gaps this post is asking about harder to spot from the outside. A wide third-party catalog, the kind NinjaOne is described as having, solves the coverage half of the problem, but granular rollout timing, the kind N-able N-central is known for, solves a different half, controlling when a patch lands rather than whether it exists at all. Kaseya VSA&#39;s note about needing more tuning to avoid noise is a real tradeoff worth sitting with, since a broad catalog that floods admins with alerts can end up functionally worse than a narrower one that only flags what actually matters.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Fleet size seems to matter more here than the vendor name, since N-able N-Sight is explicitly positioned for smaller endpoint fleets without the overhead of the larger platform, which suggests coverage breadth and operational overhead scale together more than any single vendor&#39;s marketing admits. A patch gap causing a real incident is the kind of story that usually changes buying criteria permanently, so hearing what specific software slipped through would be more useful than a general coverage comparison.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 4 days ago
- Author title: Marketing





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4