# Which PSA platforms give you the best view of project profitability and how efficiently your team is using its time?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Working on a comparison focused on one specific thing: seeing project profitability and team utilization clearly, not just tracking tasks. I went through <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/professional-services-automation">professional services automation</a> reviews for the tools people mention most for margins and capacity, and pulled ratings so the picture is a bit more grounded.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/kantata-professional-services-automation-formerly-mavenlink-kimble/reviews"><strong>Kantata</strong></a>  leans hard into resource planning and capacity forecasting, with consulting reviewers describing more accurate forecasting and milestone-based revenue recognition, though several say the dashboards and reporting take effort to use well.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/productive/reviews"><strong>Productive</strong></a>  is described by agency reviewers as the thing that tells them whether the business is staying profitable, with profitability-by-client views, budget tracking tied to invoicing and utilization reporting in one place.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/scoro/reviews"><strong>Scoro</strong></a> brings cost and profit forecasting, live dashboards and utilization planning together, with reviewers using it to watch margins and capacity, though a few note it can feel complex at first.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ruddr-professional-services-automation/reviews"><strong>Ruddr</strong></a> gets called out for utilization tracking, gross-margin analysis and productivity reporting, with reviewers saying it finally gave them a clear read on where time goes and how profitable each client is.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Curious which of these you've trusted enough to make staffing or pricing decisions from. Did the profitability numbers hold up once real data was in, or did you find yourself reconciling against a spreadsheet anyway? And how much setup did it take before utilization reporting reflected reality?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 29 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Productive is the first tool where the profitability number actually meant something. Every other platform gave us a figure we&#39;d then go verify in a spreadsheet. Productive&#39;s budget-to-invoice connection made it trustworthy enough to act on.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 18 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4