# Which Lead Mining platforms work as LinkedIn extensions to identify contact info without switching tabs?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hey G2, I've been comparing which tools in the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/lead-mining">Lead Mining category</a> work as true LinkedIn extensions, surfacing contact info right on the profile so reps never switch tabs. This is a workflow feature reps feel every single day.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/lusha/reviews"><strong>Lusha</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Its Chrome extension surfaces email and phone straight off a LinkedIn profile with a clean, simple interface, which is exactly the no-tab-switch experience. It often returns a single email or number, and credits are tight.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/apollo-io/reviews"><strong>Apollo.io</strong></a><strong>:</strong> The extension pulls contacts off LinkedIn into the same platform as your sequences, so lookup and outreach stay together. Accuracy varies from contact to contact.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/rocketreach/reviews"><strong>RocketReach</strong></a><strong>:</strong> The extension, plus a paste-a-profile lookup, lets reps confirm the exact person before reaching out. Data can be outdated, and bulk export is more manual than reviewers would like.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Which extension has been most accurate on LinkedIn for you, and how often do you still verify before reaching out? Curious whether the single-number limit is a dealbreaker.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 19 days ago
- Author title: Marketing
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Worth adding a dimension none of these usability reviews would naturally surface: how each extension actually pulls the data matters for exposure to LinkedIn&#39;s own terms of service, not just accuracy. A tool that scrapes contact info directly off the rendered profile page sits closer to what LinkedIn&#39;s terms restrict than one that works through a separate lookup step once you&#39;ve identified the person, even if both feel equally seamless day to day. The extensions that feel cleanest specifically because they read straight off the page you&#39;re already viewing are also the ones with the most direct exposure if LinkedIn tightens enforcement on scraping tools, which is a risk that wouldn&#39;t show up in any of these accuracy or credit-limit reviews until it actually happens to someone&#39;s account.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 12 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4