# Which event networking and matchmaking platforms are most trusted by senior event managers in the events services industry?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I looked specifically at reviewers who identify as senior event professionals working at events services companies, not just general users, since that's a different bar than average satisfaction scores.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/cvent-attendee-hub/reviews"><strong>Cvent Attendee Hub</strong></a> (4.3★, 219 reviews): a COO at an events services firm cited sponsorship tools and networking capabilities as standouts, while an attendee management specialist at an enterprise events company called both the front-end and back-end experience intuitive.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/vfairs/reviews"><strong>vFairs</strong></a> (4.7★, 1,783 reviews): a president at an events services company said it "simplifies our conference process," with the caveat that some attendees still need hand-holding on the tech.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/swapcard/reviews"><strong>Swapcard</strong></a> (4.6★, 228 reviews): a conference and association partnership director called it the easiest platform he's used across many events, and a senior meeting and conference coordinator praised its integrations and support team.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/bizzabo/reviews"><strong>Bizzabo</strong></a> (4.3★, 447 reviews): an events operations manager praised how it consolidates a fragmented tech stack, though flagged pricing as steep for a mid-sized events company.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Which of those criteria, sponsor tools, ease of use, integrations, or price, tends to be the deciding factor for a senior manager at your firm?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

On the deciding factor question: for our team it was ease of use over everything else, since a platform senior staff can pick up in one training session frees up so much more energy for actually running the event.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 15 hours ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive



### Comment 2

Integrations, and it isn&#39;t close. Sponsor tools get compared once during selection, whereas the integration is what the team touches every week between events. Swapcard being named for integrations and support together in your senior-reviewer pull is the combination I&#39;d weight highest.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 17 hours ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist



### Comment 3

The criterion that tends to decide it for someone senior is the one carrying personal risk, which is an attendee-facing failure in front of a client. That is why the show-day support point above is so often the real answer. The related question worth adding is what the platform does when the venue network degrades, since that is the most common cause of a bad on-site experience and it is not the vendor&#39;s fault, which is exactly why graceful-degradation behaviour matters. Worth asking each vendor what an attendee sees when connectivity drops mid-session, because the answers vary more than the feature lists do.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 10 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant



### Comment 4

Trust among experienced event managers tends to track one unglamorous thing: how the vendor behaves at 8am on show day when something breaks. Features are easy to compare and mostly converge; what separates the platforms veterans stick with is real-time support and reliability under load, which you can&#39;t see in a demo. So rather than a trust ranking, I&#39;d ask other event managers a sharper question: when it broke live, did anyone pick up the phone? That&#39;s the reputation that actually matters in this category.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4