# Which CMMS solutions integrate with existing tools without custom development while still meeting compliance requirements?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">We're looking into which <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/cmms">CMMS solutions</a> integrate with existing tools without custom development while still meeting compliance requirements, since those two asks pull in different directions, open integration usually means more configuration, not less.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Here's what came up for each:</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/fiix-cmms/reviews"><strong>Fiix CMMS</strong></a><strong>: </strong>Reviewers cite an open API that integrates with ERP and operational systems, and the platform includes a built-in audit trail for standards compliance. Does that audit trail hold up under an actual external audit, or does it need supplementary documentation?</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/pemac-cmms/reviews"><strong>Pemac</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Built specifically for compliance-intensive industries, with no-code configurability for workflows and integrations into ERP, EHS, and MES systems without developer involvement, and reviewers in pharmaceutical and manufacturing settings confirm the compliance modules in practice.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/upkeep/reviews"><strong>UpKeep</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Includes native safety and compliance modules alongside its core work order system, positioned to keep operations audit-ready without a separate compliance tool.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For teams that needed both integration and compliance at once, which requirement was harder to satisfy without a developer involved?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 22 days ago
- Author title: Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Integration would be the harder requirement to satisfy without developer help. Compliance workflows can often be configured inside the platform, but connecting ERP, EHS, or MES systems cleanly is where data mapping and edge cases usually create extra work.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 19 days ago
- Author title: Marketer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4