# Which brand asset management platforms are rated highest for centralizing digital assets?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Question for the reviewers and researchers who cover brand asset management: Trying to nail down which platforms in the<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/brand-asset-management"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/brand-asset-management">Brand Asset Management</a> category actually earn a top rating specifically for centralizing digital assets, not just for asset management broadly. </p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">G2 puts <strong>Bynder</strong> and <strong>Frontify</strong> at 4.5/5, and <strong>Canto</strong> and <strong>Brandfolder</strong> at 4.4/5, with each earning that rating for a different piece of what "centralizing" actually means.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/bynder/reviews"><strong>Bynder</strong></a>: 4.5/5. Leads this group's filtering and search scores, with governance and permissions reviewers describe as keeping one source of truth across teams rather than parallel copies.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/brandfolder/reviews"><strong>Brandfolder</strong></a>: 4.4/5. Portals separating internal and external access are the most commonly cited reason reviewers describe it as one controlled hub rather than scattered folders.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/canto/reviews"><strong>Canto</strong></a>: 4.4/5. Reviewers frequently cite fast search plus portal-based organization as reasons a team consolidates scattered drives into one library quickly.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/frontify/reviews"><strong>Frontify</strong></a>: 4.5/5, the smallest review base of this group. Centralization here leans toward brand guidelines and templates living alongside the assets themselves, rather than raw asset volume.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Which of these is more hype than substance for pure centralization, and which one's quietly underrated for it?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 21 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;For pure centralization, I’d look past the overall rating and test how well each platform prevents duplicate assets, enforces permissions, and makes the approved version easy to find. Frontify may be less of a traditional DAM play, but that brand-guideline context can make centralization more useful rather than simply creating another asset repository.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 20 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4