# What Training Management Systems support both video and written content for diverse learner types?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Employees genuinely absorb information differently, and a platform locked into one content format quietly limits who it works for. Before naming anything in <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/training-management-systems">Training Management Systems</a>, here's what that actually requires:</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"><strong>What we're hoping to find:</strong></p><ul>
<li>Native support for multiple content types in the same course, not just an external video embed</li>
<li>Formats that work well for both quick reference and deeper, structured learning</li>
<li>Enough flexibility that an administrator isn't forced into one teaching style</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Here's how a few platforms hold up against that:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/trainual/reviews"><strong>Trainual</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Reviewers specifically describe building training modules that combine text, video, and GIFs, with interactive elements like quizzes, to keep different learning styles engaged.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/skyprep/reviews"><strong>SkyPrep</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Supports any file type alongside a built-in content authoring tool, so written documentation and video content can live in the same course.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/goskills/reviews"><strong>GoSkills</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Combines gamified microlearning, 3 to 7 minute lessons, with a block-based course builder supporting SCORM, xAPI, AICC, and CMI5 imports for teams bringing in existing video or written content.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ispring-lms/reviews"><strong>iSpring LMS</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Its knowledge base provides employees with quick-reference access to written SOPs and product information, along with structured learning tracks for deeper video-based training.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Does having both formats available actually move completion rates, or does everyone just default to whichever one is faster, regardless of what's offered?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 8 days ago
- Author title: Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The more useful question is whether learners can choose the format that fits the task, not just whether both formats exist. I’d compare completion, quiz performance, and repeat-reference behavior to see whether video helps with concepts while written content carries more of the day-to-day lookup value.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 4 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4