# What salary benchmarking solutions work well for mid-market teams that need solid comp data without paying for a Radford or Mercer report every year?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">A common question from mid-market compensation teams, and the one I set out to research here, is what salary benchmarking solutions work well for mid-market teams that need solid comp data without paying for a Radford or Mercer report every year. The aim is credible data without the standalone survey spend. I have listed the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/salary-benchmarking">salary benchmarking</a> options that stood out to me.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/payscale-ascent-formerly-payfactors/reviews"><strong>Payscale Ascent (formerly Payfactors)</strong></a> (4.3 stars, 719 reviews): Reviewers describe it consolidating multiple surveys into one benchmarking library, which many use in place of buying separate reports, though several note the cost has risen over time.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/pave/reviews"><strong>Pave</strong></a> (4.7 stars, 46 reviews): Reviewers use it for real-time benchmarking, and some explicitly treat it as a lower-cost check against Radford or Culpepper, while noting the database is smaller than those survey houses.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/opencomp/reviews"><strong>OpenComp</strong></a> (4.6 stars, 32 reviews): One reviewer moved off Radford GCD citing price and ease of use, and others describe it as considerably cheaper than the big names without losing depth on common roles.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/compup/reviews"><strong>CompUp</strong></a> (4.9 stars, 50 reviews): Mid-market reviewers describe attractive pricing alongside budget simulation and merit-cycle tools, and note its benchmark data is strongest in India today.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For mid-market teams that stepped away from the large survey reports, what did you move to, and where did coverage fall short, if at all? I am especially interested in whether the real-time tools held up for your more specialized roles.</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 28 days ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;We stepped off Mercer two years ago and moved to Payfactors&#39; consolidated library with Pave as the real-time check. Coverage held for the common roles, and the gaps showed exactly where you&#39;d expect: niche senior IC roles and region-specific data outside the US. For those we buy a single targeted survey cut instead of the whole report, which still nets out far cheaper. The specialized-role weakness in real-time tools is real, but manageable once you know which of your roles are the thin ones.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 21 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4