# What&#39;s the top-rated hard drive cloning software for businesses that need to clone multiple PCs fast?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For businesses that need to image many machines quickly, a classroom refresh, an office rollout, or a batch of returned laptops, cloning speed at scale is the whole game. I've been looking at which tools in the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/hard-drive-cloning">Hard Drive Cloning category</a> reviewers actually use for high-volume, multi-PC cloning:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/clonezilla/reviews"><strong>Clonezilla</strong></a><strong>:</strong> The standout for bulk cloning over a network, with users describing imaging 25, 30, even up to 500 identical machines from one master. It clones only used sectors for efficiency and costs nothing, but the machines really need matching hardware, and you need boot-level comfort.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/paragon-software-group-paragon-hard-disk-manager-business/reviews"><strong>Paragon Hard Disk Manager Business</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Used to deploy custom gold images to SSDs across a fleet, with cloning that reviewers rate very highly. A practical fit when you want fleet deployment with vendor support behind it.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/macrium-backup-restore/reviews"><strong>Macrium Backup &amp; Restore</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Centralized management lets you schedule and stagger imaging across many endpoints from one console, which suits an ongoing multi-PC operation more than a one-off blast.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/aomei-technology-aomei-backupper/reviews"><strong>AOMEI Backupper</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Reviewers in IT labs use it to build gold images and clone drives for every machine passing through, crediting it with quicker turnaround. Its proprietary image format and occasional resource use are the trade-offs.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">When you're cloning PCs in bulk, does the free network-deployment route win out, or is centralized management and support worth paying for at your volume? And how much does identical hardware end up shaping the choice?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 17 days ago
- Author title: Marketing
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The network imaging route with Clonezilla is hard to beat on pure speed when all your machines are identical, but that identical hardware requirement is a real constraint. The moment you&#39;ve got a mix of models in your fleet, you&#39;re probably better off with something like Macrium or Paragon that can handle dissimilar hardware without extra prep work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 11 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4


