# What&#39;s the most trusted medical billing platform for medical practice professionals based on user reviews?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Looking for input from G2 reviewers who are practice managers, billing specialists, physicians, and revenue cycle managers in the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/medical-billing-companies">Medical Billing category</a>, specifically from those who depend on medical billing software or a managed billing service as a primary revenue.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The platforms with the strongest medical practice professional trust evidence:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/tebra/reviews"><strong>Tebra (formerly Kareo Billing)</strong></a>: The eligibility verification, automated claim scrubbing, and denial tracking workflow are credited for reducing the clean claim resubmission cycle that consumes billing staff time at practices without a dedicated RCM team. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/athenaone/reviews"><strong>athenaOne</strong></a>: The all-in-one EHR and billing model that eliminates the need to maintain separate clinical and billing systems is credited by practices for reducing the administrative overhead of managing two vendor relationships and two data environments. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/advancedmd/reviews"><strong>AdvancedMD</strong></a>: The denial management module and accounts receivable reporting are credited for giving billing managers visibility into payer performance and denial patterns at a level that informs negotiation and follow-up strategy. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/waystar/reviews"><strong>Waystar</strong></a>: The real-time eligibility check and claim status inquiry capabilities are credited for reducing the manual phone and portal work that billing staff performs to verify coverage and check claim status. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/drchrono/reviews"><strong>DrChrono</strong></a>: The iPad-native EHR and integrated medical billing platform for independent practices is described as the professional trust model for mobile-first practices, and those with significant clinical documentation needs alongside billing, where the ability to complete an encounter note and submit the associated claim from the same device without re-entry is the primary efficiency driver. </li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For billing professionals and practice managers who have used the same medical billing platform for more than two years: what was the claim type, payer, or denial scenario that your platform handles most reliably, and what billing task do you still manage outside the platform because it handles it poorly?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 13 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Medical Billing reviews on G2 are split between platforms that consolidate clinical and billing data and platforms that sharpen one specific part of the revenue cycle. athenaOne&#39;s all-in-one EHR and billing model removes an entire vendor relationship and data environment, which is a structurally different bet than Tebra&#39;s eligibility verification and claim scrubbing workflow, which stays focused on shrinking the clean-claim resubmission cycle specifically rather than consolidating systems.
Waystar&#39;s real-time eligibility and claim status checks and AdvancedMD&#39;s denial management reporting both answer a narrower, more specific question than either of the platform-consolidation plays, reducing a particular kind of manual work rather than restructuring how many systems a practice runs. DrChrono&#39;s iPad-native, single-device encounter-to-claim flow is worth separating out from the rest since it&#39;s solving for mobility and speed at the point of care, specifically, which matters most for practices where the biggest time sink is re-entering information after leaving the room rather than anything happening in the back office.


##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 11 days ago
- Author title: Marketing





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4


