# What’s the best FP&amp;A software for a mid-sized SaaS company that needs solid forecasting and scenario planning?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I’m trying to evaluate what’s the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/fp-a-financial-planning-analysis">best FP&amp;A software</a> for a mid-sized SaaS company that needs solid forecasting and scenario planning? The challenge here seems to be balancing flexibility with usability. SaaS companies often need driver-based models but also need tools that finance teams can manage without heavy technical support.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Drivetrain, Planful, and Datarails often come up in this context. Here are the tools I’ve been evaluating:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/drivetrain-drivetrain/reviews">Drivetrain</a> (4.8/5 on G2): Scales with complexity while remaining intuitive for users. It’s particularly strong for reporting and extended planning.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/planful/reviews">Planful </a>(4.3/5 on G2): A more traditional FP&amp;A platform that offers solid forecasting capabilities without being overly complex.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/datarails/reviews">Datarails</a> (4.6/5 on G2): Useful for teams that want to improve forecasting while staying close to Excel workflows.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/vena/reviews">Vena</a> (4.5/5 on G2): Another strong option for Excel-centric teams, especially where finance wants control without relying heavily on engineering.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/liveflow/reviews">LiveFlow </a>(4.9/5 on G2): Interesting for SaaS teams that want real-time data integration (especially with accounting tools) feeding directly into forecasts.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">If you are a part of a mid-sized SaaS team, what's more important in practice: speed of iteration on scenarios, accuracy of forecasts, or ease of maintaining the model?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 4 months ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

For pure forecasting depth, Workday Adaptive Planning and Anaplan lead most evaluations. If you want something that&#39;s powerful but won&#39;t take 6 months to implement, Mosaic has a faster time to value for SaaS metrics specifically — ARR, NRR, headcount planning all baked in. Casual is also soemthing to consider. I&#39;d suggest looking at reviews on G2 for these and decide based on what you need

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 months ago
- Author title: SaaS and Software Research



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;Explore how &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.g2.com/compare/drivetrain-drivetrain-vs-planful&quot; rel=&quot;noopener noreferrer&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Drivetrain compares to Planful&lt;/a&gt; as models become more complex.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 4 months ago
- Author title: Marketer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4


